Alphaserve Goes Custom With New Legal Innovation Consulting Group
The new offering will provide a dedicated group of legal and tech experts to help law firms and legal departments design, launch and manage a variety of legal tech platforms.
November 16, 2017 at 01:23 PM
7 minute read
![technology implementation](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/397/2017/11/Technology-Implementation-Article-201711161822.jpg)
The challenges posed by implementing a new technology platform in-house can often beset the most seasoned law firm or legal department manager. So it's little surprise managed services companies are becoming more of a mainstay in the legal industry by offering more hands-on services.
The latest to join the fold is Alphaserve Technologies with the launch of its Legal Innovation Consulting group. With the new offering, the company hopes to become a vital partner in legal tech creation, deployment and management.
What It Is: Alphaserve's Legal Innovation Consulting group is a hands-on managed service team that helps law firms and legal departments create, implement and manage legal technology platforms in-house.
Arup Das, CEO of Alphaserve Technologies, noted that the service evolved out of a smaller artificial intelligence consultancy group the company offered two years prior to help law firms to realize a lot of the applications of AI. Alphaserve, however, soon “realized there is a lot of commonality with AI and client driven application need,” he added. “We were doing it as a one-off consultancy, but we wanted to go after the market and say we have a formalized offering.”
Currently, the company's Legal Innovation Consulting group consists of “around eight or nine” full-time employees, Das said, including one lawyer, three data scientists and three application engineers, though the company expects the team will grow in the near future.
How It Works: The Legal Innovation Consulting group helps clients deploy any number of technologies, from compliance to e-discovery and contracts. The projects can either entail an office-wide deployment or a one-off tool for a particular case.
“It's not just AI stuff we are building,” Das said. “We are also building specific platforms for clients for specific cases.”
Starting from the ideation phase, the group will meet with law firm or legal department managers to understand their teams' operations and pain points. “Then we come back with a report saying these are the areas where we believe” technology can help, Das said, adding that the team may come up with dozens of ideas and then work with clients to narrow it to one.
From there, the team does a proof of concept, “which lasts about two to six weeks,” he added, and once approved, starts implementation.
All projects from the Legal Innovation Consulting group that are for clients are implemented on premise, and data associated with the project is always stored in-house with the clients. And though Alphaserve can help manage the platforms it creates on an ongoing basis, clients “can keep most of the IP we build for them in-house,” Das said.
Competition: While some managed service companies like Yerra focus on outsourced services, there are others that also offer hands-on legal technology implementation similar to Alphaserve, such as Pramata and Riverview Law. Das, however, argued that many of those competitors do not offer full “bespoke custom solutions” and instead rely on established technology vendors or their own platform offerings.
Beyond other managed services, Das also sees the big consultancy groups such as Deloitte, PricewaterhouseCoopers and Ernst & Young as competitors as well.
But he believes that Legal Innovation Consultancy group can coexist with these while attracting clients on its own because of the high level of “subject matter expertise” the group brings to the table.
![technology implementation](http://images.law.com/contrib/content/uploads/sites/397/2017/11/Technology-Implementation-Article-201711161822.jpg)
The challenges posed by implementing a new technology platform in-house can often beset the most seasoned law firm or legal department manager. So it's little surprise managed services companies are becoming more of a mainstay in the legal industry by offering more hands-on services.
The latest to join the fold is Alphaserve Technologies with the launch of its Legal Innovation Consulting group. With the new offering, the company hopes to become a vital partner in legal tech creation, deployment and management.
What It Is: Alphaserve's Legal Innovation Consulting group is a hands-on managed service team that helps law firms and legal departments create, implement and manage legal technology platforms in-house.
Arup Das, CEO of Alphaserve Technologies, noted that the service evolved out of a smaller artificial intelligence consultancy group the company offered two years prior to help law firms to realize a lot of the applications of AI. Alphaserve, however, soon “realized there is a lot of commonality with AI and client driven application need,” he added. “We were doing it as a one-off consultancy, but we wanted to go after the market and say we have a formalized offering.”
Currently, the company's Legal Innovation Consulting group consists of “around eight or nine” full-time employees, Das said, including one lawyer, three data scientists and three application engineers, though the company expects the team will grow in the near future.
How It Works: The Legal Innovation Consulting group helps clients deploy any number of technologies, from compliance to e-discovery and contracts. The projects can either entail an office-wide deployment or a one-off tool for a particular case.
“It's not just AI stuff we are building,” Das said. “We are also building specific platforms for clients for specific cases.”
Starting from the ideation phase, the group will meet with law firm or legal department managers to understand their teams' operations and pain points. “Then we come back with a report saying these are the areas where we believe” technology can help, Das said, adding that the team may come up with dozens of ideas and then work with clients to narrow it to one.
From there, the team does a proof of concept, “which lasts about two to six weeks,” he added, and once approved, starts implementation.
All projects from the Legal Innovation Consulting group that are for clients are implemented on premise, and data associated with the project is always stored in-house with the clients. And though Alphaserve can help manage the platforms it creates on an ongoing basis, clients “can keep most of the IP we build for them in-house,” Das said.
Competition: While some managed service companies like Yerra focus on outsourced services, there are others that also offer hands-on legal technology implementation similar to Alphaserve, such as Pramata and Riverview Law. Das, however, argued that many of those competitors do not offer full “bespoke custom solutions” and instead rely on established technology vendors or their own platform offerings.
Beyond other managed services, Das also sees the big consultancy groups such as
But he believes that Legal Innovation Consultancy group can coexist with these while attracting clients on its own because of the high level of “subject matter expertise” the group brings to the table.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1DC Circuit Keeps Docs in Judge Newman's Misconduct Proceedings Sealed
- 2Litigators of the Week: US Soccer and MLS Fend Off Claims They Conspired to Scuttle Rival League’s Prospect
- 3Litigator of the Week Runners-Up and Shout-Outs
- 4U.S.- China Trade War: Lawyers and Clients Left 'Relying on the Governments to Sort This Out'
- 5Willkie Adds Five-Lawyer Team From Quinn Emanuel in Germany
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250