Alphaserve Goes Custom With New Legal Innovation Consulting Group
The new offering will provide a dedicated group of legal and tech experts to help law firms and legal departments design, launch and manage a variety of legal tech platforms.
November 16, 2017 at 01:23 PM
7 minute read
Photo by shutterstock
The challenges posed by implementing a new technology platform in-house can often beset the most seasoned law firm or legal department manager. So it's little surprise managed services companies are becoming more of a mainstay in the legal industry by offering more hands-on services.
The latest to join the fold is Alphaserve Technologies with the launch of its Legal Innovation Consulting group. With the new offering, the company hopes to become a vital partner in legal tech creation, deployment and management.
What It Is: Alphaserve's Legal Innovation Consulting group is a hands-on managed service team that helps law firms and legal departments create, implement and manage legal technology platforms in-house.
Arup Das, CEO of Alphaserve Technologies, noted that the service evolved out of a smaller artificial intelligence consultancy group the company offered two years prior to help law firms to realize a lot of the applications of AI. Alphaserve, however, soon “realized there is a lot of commonality with AI and client driven application need,” he added. “We were doing it as a one-off consultancy, but we wanted to go after the market and say we have a formalized offering.”
Currently, the company's Legal Innovation Consulting group consists of “around eight or nine” full-time employees, Das said, including one lawyer, three data scientists and three application engineers, though the company expects the team will grow in the near future.
How It Works: The Legal Innovation Consulting group helps clients deploy any number of technologies, from compliance to e-discovery and contracts. The projects can either entail an office-wide deployment or a one-off tool for a particular case.
“It's not just AI stuff we are building,” Das said. “We are also building specific platforms for clients for specific cases.”
Starting from the ideation phase, the group will meet with law firm or legal department managers to understand their teams' operations and pain points. “Then we come back with a report saying these are the areas where we believe” technology can help, Das said, adding that the team may come up with dozens of ideas and then work with clients to narrow it to one.
From there, the team does a proof of concept, “which lasts about two to six weeks,” he added, and once approved, starts implementation.
All projects from the Legal Innovation Consulting group that are for clients are implemented on premise, and data associated with the project is always stored in-house with the clients. And though Alphaserve can help manage the platforms it creates on an ongoing basis, clients “can keep most of the IP we build for them in-house,” Das said.
Competition: While some managed service companies like Yerra focus on outsourced services, there are others that also offer hands-on legal technology implementation similar to Alphaserve, such as Pramata and Riverview Law. Das, however, argued that many of those competitors do not offer full “bespoke custom solutions” and instead rely on established technology vendors or their own platform offerings.
Beyond other managed services, Das also sees the big consultancy groups such as Deloitte, PricewaterhouseCoopers and Ernst & Young as competitors as well.
But he believes that Legal Innovation Consultancy group can coexist with these while attracting clients on its own because of the high level of “subject matter expertise” the group brings to the table.
Photo by shutterstock
The challenges posed by implementing a new technology platform in-house can often beset the most seasoned law firm or legal department manager. So it's little surprise managed services companies are becoming more of a mainstay in the legal industry by offering more hands-on services.
The latest to join the fold is Alphaserve Technologies with the launch of its Legal Innovation Consulting group. With the new offering, the company hopes to become a vital partner in legal tech creation, deployment and management.
What It Is: Alphaserve's Legal Innovation Consulting group is a hands-on managed service team that helps law firms and legal departments create, implement and manage legal technology platforms in-house.
Arup Das, CEO of Alphaserve Technologies, noted that the service evolved out of a smaller artificial intelligence consultancy group the company offered two years prior to help law firms to realize a lot of the applications of AI. Alphaserve, however, soon “realized there is a lot of commonality with AI and client driven application need,” he added. “We were doing it as a one-off consultancy, but we wanted to go after the market and say we have a formalized offering.”
Currently, the company's Legal Innovation Consulting group consists of “around eight or nine” full-time employees, Das said, including one lawyer, three data scientists and three application engineers, though the company expects the team will grow in the near future.
How It Works: The Legal Innovation Consulting group helps clients deploy any number of technologies, from compliance to e-discovery and contracts. The projects can either entail an office-wide deployment or a one-off tool for a particular case.
“It's not just AI stuff we are building,” Das said. “We are also building specific platforms for clients for specific cases.”
Starting from the ideation phase, the group will meet with law firm or legal department managers to understand their teams' operations and pain points. “Then we come back with a report saying these are the areas where we believe” technology can help, Das said, adding that the team may come up with dozens of ideas and then work with clients to narrow it to one.
From there, the team does a proof of concept, “which lasts about two to six weeks,” he added, and once approved, starts implementation.
All projects from the Legal Innovation Consulting group that are for clients are implemented on premise, and data associated with the project is always stored in-house with the clients. And though Alphaserve can help manage the platforms it creates on an ongoing basis, clients “can keep most of the IP we build for them in-house,” Das said.
Competition: While some managed service companies like Yerra focus on outsourced services, there are others that also offer hands-on legal technology implementation similar to Alphaserve, such as Pramata and Riverview Law. Das, however, argued that many of those competitors do not offer full “bespoke custom solutions” and instead rely on established technology vendors or their own platform offerings.
Beyond other managed services, Das also sees the big consultancy groups such as
But he believes that Legal Innovation Consultancy group can coexist with these while attracting clients on its own because of the high level of “subject matter expertise” the group brings to the table.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250