This Australian AI Aims to Be a 'Law Firm Without Lawyers'
Adrian Cartland's Ailira bot can handle tax research, aid victims of domestic violence and asset protection.
November 17, 2017 at 08:00 AM
7 minute read
Legal services aren't cheap, nor is it cheap to practice law—consider overhead costs, transportation, that law degree, and paying everyone needed to make the process flow smoothly. Which, ostensibly at least, partially accounts for why the cost of legal services places them out of reach for many consumers.
Many providers lower legal fees by automating components of the workflow, typically those handled by paralegals and assistants. Taking this a step further is Ailira (Artificially Intelligent Legal Information Research Assistant). On Nov. 13, the company announced its “Law Firm Without Lawyers” service, which aims to take legal services directly to the consumer for a lower cost than those typically charged by a service provider.
Ailira leverages “lawyer-free” legal services provisions with AI technology, basically functioning as a sort of chatbot in which users can provide their information, answer a few questions, and be provided with documents relevant to their legal issue. Among the services currently offered by this lawyer-free law firm are will drafting and services, assistance with asset protection, and help with legal documentation for structuring a business.
So where does the lawyer-free law firm operate? Turns out it's at a shopping complex in northern Australia. Here, potential clients can sit at a computer and answer questions for Ailira, which will then generate a will. The Australian Broadcasting Corp. cited one user saying that the service was “really easy,” merely requiring him to enter “basic details” before the bot “does the whole thing for you,.”
Ailira developer Adrian Cartland told LTN that the bot provides “all legal information for free,” but charges fees for documents. For example, the fee for a “simple will, trust deed or company incorporation” is AU$150. Ailira also allows the option of chatting with a human lawyer or having them review documents or provide additional legal advice, but also for a fee.
Cartland is a tax lawyer and practices under his eponymous firm. He and his developers initially created Ailira in 2016 for help with tax law research as well as researching a law firms' private files. That December, the service was provided to law firms for AU$90 a month. That same year, Ailira was granted funding from the Australian government to develop a prototype to help domestic violence victims with legal advice.
The assistance with domestic violence has yet to be released to the public, though it is slated to be added “in due course,” noted a statement from Ailira.
“The consumer chatbot aspect of Ailira is providing legal services to people who would otherwise be priced out of the market. That is, this is an entirely new market,” Cartland said. “As we know from microeconomics, a decrease in price leads to an increase in quantity demanded. Therefore the future of law is a massive expansion of the legal market.”
Ailira isn't the first effort to capitalize on chatbot-based technologies to provide cheaper legal services. DoNotPay, for example, was released this year by Stanford University student Josh Browder to help draft documentation to fight parking tickets, and has since expanded into other practice areas. Meanwhile, students at the University of Cambridge developed Lawbot, which provides preliminary assessments of situations for crime victims in the U.K.
Much of the work these bots, and AI technology in general, do is typical of paralegals and assistants. Cartland noted, however, that Ailira's “Law Firm Without Lawyers” “hired three new law graduates to service a practice that didn't previously exist.”
“This will be replicated by myself and others over the coming years, and so there is a very bright future for the law,” he added.
Legal services aren't cheap, nor is it cheap to practice law—consider overhead costs, transportation, that law degree, and paying everyone needed to make the process flow smoothly. Which, ostensibly at least, partially accounts for why the cost of legal services places them out of reach for many consumers.
Many providers lower legal fees by automating components of the workflow, typically those handled by paralegals and assistants. Taking this a step further is Ailira (Artificially Intelligent Legal Information Research Assistant). On Nov. 13, the company announced its “Law Firm Without Lawyers” service, which aims to take legal services directly to the consumer for a lower cost than those typically charged by a service provider.
Ailira leverages “lawyer-free” legal services provisions with AI technology, basically functioning as a sort of chatbot in which users can provide their information, answer a few questions, and be provided with documents relevant to their legal issue. Among the services currently offered by this lawyer-free law firm are will drafting and services, assistance with asset protection, and help with legal documentation for structuring a business.
So where does the lawyer-free law firm operate? Turns out it's at a shopping complex in northern Australia. Here, potential clients can sit at a computer and answer questions for Ailira, which will then generate a will. The Australian Broadcasting Corp. cited one user saying that the service was “really easy,” merely requiring him to enter “basic details” before the bot “does the whole thing for you,.”
Ailira developer Adrian Cartland told LTN that the bot provides “all legal information for free,” but charges fees for documents. For example, the fee for a “simple will, trust deed or company incorporation” is AU$150. Ailira also allows the option of chatting with a human lawyer or having them review documents or provide additional legal advice, but also for a fee.
Cartland is a tax lawyer and practices under his eponymous firm. He and his developers initially created Ailira in 2016 for help with tax law research as well as researching a law firms' private files. That December, the service was provided to law firms for AU$90 a month. That same year, Ailira was granted funding from the Australian government to develop a prototype to help domestic violence victims with legal advice.
The assistance with domestic violence has yet to be released to the public, though it is slated to be added “in due course,” noted a statement from Ailira.
“The consumer chatbot aspect of Ailira is providing legal services to people who would otherwise be priced out of the market. That is, this is an entirely new market,” Cartland said. “As we know from microeconomics, a decrease in price leads to an increase in quantity demanded. Therefore the future of law is a massive expansion of the legal market.”
Ailira isn't the first effort to capitalize on chatbot-based technologies to provide cheaper legal services. DoNotPay, for example, was released this year by Stanford University student Josh Browder to help draft documentation to fight parking tickets, and has since expanded into other practice areas. Meanwhile, students at the University of Cambridge developed Lawbot, which provides preliminary assessments of situations for crime victims in the U.K.
Much of the work these bots, and AI technology in general, do is typical of paralegals and assistants. Cartland noted, however, that Ailira's “Law Firm Without Lawyers” “hired three new law graduates to service a practice that didn't previously exist.”
“This will be replicated by myself and others over the coming years, and so there is a very bright future for the law,” he added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250