This Australian AI Aims to Be a 'Law Firm Without Lawyers'
Adrian Cartland's Ailira bot can handle tax research, aid victims of domestic violence and asset protection.
November 17, 2017 at 08:00 AM
7 minute read
Legal services aren't cheap, nor is it cheap to practice law—consider overhead costs, transportation, that law degree, and paying everyone needed to make the process flow smoothly. Which, ostensibly at least, partially accounts for why the cost of legal services places them out of reach for many consumers.
Many providers lower legal fees by automating components of the workflow, typically those handled by paralegals and assistants. Taking this a step further is Ailira (Artificially Intelligent Legal Information Research Assistant). On Nov. 13, the company announced its “Law Firm Without Lawyers” service, which aims to take legal services directly to the consumer for a lower cost than those typically charged by a service provider.
Ailira leverages “lawyer-free” legal services provisions with AI technology, basically functioning as a sort of chatbot in which users can provide their information, answer a few questions, and be provided with documents relevant to their legal issue. Among the services currently offered by this lawyer-free law firm are will drafting and services, assistance with asset protection, and help with legal documentation for structuring a business.
So where does the lawyer-free law firm operate? Turns out it's at a shopping complex in northern Australia. Here, potential clients can sit at a computer and answer questions for Ailira, which will then generate a will. The Australian Broadcasting Corp. cited one user saying that the service was “really easy,” merely requiring him to enter “basic details” before the bot “does the whole thing for you,.”
Ailira developer Adrian Cartland told LTN that the bot provides “all legal information for free,” but charges fees for documents. For example, the fee for a “simple will, trust deed or company incorporation” is AU$150. Ailira also allows the option of chatting with a human lawyer or having them review documents or provide additional legal advice, but also for a fee.
Cartland is a tax lawyer and practices under his eponymous firm. He and his developers initially created Ailira in 2016 for help with tax law research as well as researching a law firms' private files. That December, the service was provided to law firms for AU$90 a month. That same year, Ailira was granted funding from the Australian government to develop a prototype to help domestic violence victims with legal advice.
The assistance with domestic violence has yet to be released to the public, though it is slated to be added “in due course,” noted a statement from Ailira.
“The consumer chatbot aspect of Ailira is providing legal services to people who would otherwise be priced out of the market. That is, this is an entirely new market,” Cartland said. “As we know from microeconomics, a decrease in price leads to an increase in quantity demanded. Therefore the future of law is a massive expansion of the legal market.”
Ailira isn't the first effort to capitalize on chatbot-based technologies to provide cheaper legal services. DoNotPay, for example, was released this year by Stanford University student Josh Browder to help draft documentation to fight parking tickets, and has since expanded into other practice areas. Meanwhile, students at the University of Cambridge developed Lawbot, which provides preliminary assessments of situations for crime victims in the U.K.
Much of the work these bots, and AI technology in general, do is typical of paralegals and assistants. Cartland noted, however, that Ailira's “Law Firm Without Lawyers” “hired three new law graduates to service a practice that didn't previously exist.”
“This will be replicated by myself and others over the coming years, and so there is a very bright future for the law,” he added.
Legal services aren't cheap, nor is it cheap to practice law—consider overhead costs, transportation, that law degree, and paying everyone needed to make the process flow smoothly. Which, ostensibly at least, partially accounts for why the cost of legal services places them out of reach for many consumers.
Many providers lower legal fees by automating components of the workflow, typically those handled by paralegals and assistants. Taking this a step further is Ailira (Artificially Intelligent Legal Information Research Assistant). On Nov. 13, the company announced its “Law Firm Without Lawyers” service, which aims to take legal services directly to the consumer for a lower cost than those typically charged by a service provider.
Ailira leverages “lawyer-free” legal services provisions with AI technology, basically functioning as a sort of chatbot in which users can provide their information, answer a few questions, and be provided with documents relevant to their legal issue. Among the services currently offered by this lawyer-free law firm are will drafting and services, assistance with asset protection, and help with legal documentation for structuring a business.
So where does the lawyer-free law firm operate? Turns out it's at a shopping complex in northern Australia. Here, potential clients can sit at a computer and answer questions for Ailira, which will then generate a will. The Australian Broadcasting Corp. cited one user saying that the service was “really easy,” merely requiring him to enter “basic details” before the bot “does the whole thing for you,.”
Ailira developer Adrian Cartland told LTN that the bot provides “all legal information for free,” but charges fees for documents. For example, the fee for a “simple will, trust deed or company incorporation” is AU$150. Ailira also allows the option of chatting with a human lawyer or having them review documents or provide additional legal advice, but also for a fee.
Cartland is a tax lawyer and practices under his eponymous firm. He and his developers initially created Ailira in 2016 for help with tax law research as well as researching a law firms' private files. That December, the service was provided to law firms for AU$90 a month. That same year, Ailira was granted funding from the Australian government to develop a prototype to help domestic violence victims with legal advice.
The assistance with domestic violence has yet to be released to the public, though it is slated to be added “in due course,” noted a statement from Ailira.
“The consumer chatbot aspect of Ailira is providing legal services to people who would otherwise be priced out of the market. That is, this is an entirely new market,” Cartland said. “As we know from microeconomics, a decrease in price leads to an increase in quantity demanded. Therefore the future of law is a massive expansion of the legal market.”
Ailira isn't the first effort to capitalize on chatbot-based technologies to provide cheaper legal services. DoNotPay, for example, was released this year by Stanford University student Josh Browder to help draft documentation to fight parking tickets, and has since expanded into other practice areas. Meanwhile, students at the University of Cambridge developed Lawbot, which provides preliminary assessments of situations for crime victims in the U.K.
Much of the work these bots, and AI technology in general, do is typical of paralegals and assistants. Cartland noted, however, that Ailira's “Law Firm Without Lawyers” “hired three new law graduates to service a practice that didn't previously exist.”
“This will be replicated by myself and others over the coming years, and so there is a very bright future for the law,” he added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Public Notices/Calendars
- 2Wednesday Newspaper
- 3Decision of the Day: Qui Tam Relators Do Not Plausibly Claim Firm Avoided Tax Obligations Through Visa Applications, Circuit Finds
- 4Judicial Ethics Opinion 24-116
- 5Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250