UC Hastings Law to Add AI, Startup Tech Courses
"Using Artificial Intelligence in Legal Practice" will help students build familiarity in using AI-based research platforms, while "Legal Tech Startup Skills" will guide students through launching their own companies.
November 21, 2017 at 11:30 AM
5 minute read
San Francisco-based UC Hastings College of the Law recently announced its new course offerings for the spring semester, including two new courses centering on technology and its potential applications to the law.
“Using Artificial Intelligence in Legal Practice,” a new course taught by Duke University School of Law professor Francis McGovern, will help students build familiarity in using AI-based research platforms such as Lex Machina and Ravel Law. Another course, “Legal Tech Startup Skills,” will guide students through the process of launching their own legal technology startup companies.
Alice Armitage, professor of law at UC Hastings and director of the school's Startup Legal Garage, will teach the Legal Tech Startup Skills course. “It's essentially a business course. I'm teaching them all the things you'd learn in an incubator or accelerator program,” she said of the course.
Both courses are part of LexLab, the university's new innovation hub launching next spring. Armitage explained that UC Hastings took some of the basic principles of the Startup Legal Garage, which has students assist in providing legal services to Bay Area startups, and aimed to spin them into a broader institutional resource for startup entrepreneurs, most notably in the legal technology space.
The Legal Tech Startup Skills class will culminate in the development of a pitch deck for a potential legal technology startup.
Armitage noted that even if students don't manage to successfully launch the world's next legal technology success story, they'll likely be better prepared to work with clients in and around the technology sector. “They'll be better lawyers working for startups if they've been through that process,” she said. “It's increasingly true these days that the practice of law is increasingly client-focused.” As she explained, law school graduates who can relate in some way to the processes and procedures of launching a startup may be better prepared to advise clients in modern ways.
Armitage is no stranger to the world of startup entrepreneurship. “My startup didn't end up being a success, but it was a really interesting process of learning. I'm taking what I know personally having been through that process and trying to teach the students what that is,” she said.
Startups in the legal technology space tend to fall into two broad buckets, according to Armitage: law firm operations and management ideas, which includes things such as e-discovery, document management and permissioning, task automation, and access-to-justice ideas. These ideas range from self-serve legal tools such as LegalZoom and Rocket Lawyer to information guides and the like.
However, legal tech entrepreneurs rely on slightly different skill sets than lawyers. “Lawyers don't really work a lot as teams. You do when you practice law, but you don't in law school, so we're going to work a lot in teams,” Armitage said of the class.
McGovern is hoping that his AI course can be similarly practical-minded for students. “The concern I had was that in the next five to 10 years, a great deal of the work that first- and second-year associates at firms do can be done by legal robots,” he said. Taking a similar tactic as the women working for NASA's computations department in the 2016 film “Hidden Figures,” McGovern hopes to get his students working with, not against, technology. “If I can teach law students how to use the bots, they can leapfrog into, in effect, the third year,” he said.
Although AI is among the more confusing technology trends on the market to date, McGovern hopes that students can build enough of a literacy with the technology that they can check its basic assumptions. “You need to know enough about how it works to guard against the downsides,” he said.
UC Hastings joins a number of law schools looking to broaden curricular offerings around technology in the spring semester. University of California, Berkeley School of Law will offer an interdisciplinary course centering on legal questions surrounding blockchain in the spring, and Northwestern University's Pritzker School of Law also announced it would bring on ROSS Intelligence's AI tools for student use.
Student demand is driving some of these initiatives at law schools. Although Armitage capped the Legal Tech Startup Skills course at 15, there are students clamoring for access to similar curriculum. In the past, she noted, she knows that interest extends well beyond the number of students who can enroll in these courses. Faculty have certainly taken note.
“I'd say this is a movement nationwide in the most innovative law schools. I don't think it's everyone yet, but it's like the beginnings of the revolution. There are rumblings everywhere,” Armitage added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250