The (Somewhat) Good News and Bad News of Corporate Cyber Readiness
The NACD's recently released Public Company Governance Survey contains both troubling and encouraging findings concerning the current state cybersecurity risk readiness.
November 30, 2017 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
The National Association of Corporate Directors (NACD) recently released the results of its flagship 2017-2018 Public Company Governance Survey, which identifies key areas of concern for corporate directors. This year's survey results contain both troubling and encouraging findings concerning the current state cybersecurity risk readiness at public companies.
Not surprisingly, the survey of 587 corporate directors of 520 public companies identified cyber security threats among the top five trends predicted to have the greatest effect on companies over the next 12 months, trailing behind only risks associated with significant industry change, business model disruption, and changing global economic conditions.
The (Somewhat) Good News
The encouraging news from the survey is that boards seem to be slowly gaining a better understanding of cybersecurity risks, enabling them to better vet and question the information they receive from corporate management about cyber risks. This year, 15 percent of directors believe that their boards have very little or no knowledge of cyber risks, compared with 22 percent in 2015. By any measure, however, 15 percent is a remarkably high number for public companies concerning this critical risk.
On a brighter side, it appears that more of today's corporate directors are not blindly accepting internal reporting concerning their company's state of cyber readiness. Twenty-two percent of directors indicated dissatisfaction with the quality of cyber risk information they receive from corporate management. Those directors do not believe that they have adequate transparency into the company's cyber security problems or that the information they are receiving does not allow for effective internal and external benchmarking.
These should be critical areas of concern for every corporate director, as responsibility and liability for cybersecurity is beginning to reach board levels, as exemplified by the New York State Department of Financial Services (DFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, which contains explicit board responsibilities and mandates written certification of compliance with the regulation by the board or a senior officer. It is widely anticipated that other regulators will follow DFS's lead and adopt similar regulations, further increasing the cyber risk stakes for corporate directors.
The Bad News
The survey also contain some findings that have no silver lining. Only 37 percent of directors are confident or very confident that their companies are properly secured against a cyber attack, while 60 percent indicated that they are only slightly or moderately confident. Three percent responded that they are not at all confident. In the survey's Executive Summary, the NACD noted that the lack of board confidence “may be driven by the fact that existing defense systems quickly become obsolete when cyber threats mutate and companies adopt new technologies.”
Final Thoughts
This year's NACD survey provides an important reality check for directors and their legal counsel concerning the current state of board awareness and competence relating to cyber risk. Those risks are now firmly on the shoulders of today's corporate directors. Indifference to the risks or simply accepting internal reporting about them will not suffice, given their gravity and the financial, competitive, and reputational impact they can have on the enterprise. To protect themselves and their companies, corporate directors need to engage in active, engaged, informed, and documented oversight of cyber risks.
Judy Selby JD is a Principal of Judy Selby Consulting LLC and a senior advisor at Hanover Stone Partners LLC. She provides insurance consulting, cyber insurance analysis, and insurance coverage expert witness services, with a particular focus on cyber-related issues.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Big Law Firms Sheppard Mullin, Morgan Lewis and Baker Botts Add Partners in Houston
- 2Lack of Jurisdiction Dooms Child Sex Abuse Claim Against Archdiocese of Philadelphia, says NJ Supreme Court
- 3DC Lawsuits Seek to Prevent Mass Firings and Public Naming of FBI Agents
- 4Growth of California Firms Exceeded Expectations, Survey of Managing Partners Says
- 5Blank Rome Adds Life Sciences Trio From Reed Smith
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250