The Global Game: AI Company Luminance's Overseas Expansion
U.K.-based contract analysis company Luminance recently opened its Chicago office and closed a $10M funding round. Now, it plans on ramping up its growth strategy.
December 01, 2017 at 11:25 AM
3 minute read
Based in the U.K., Luminance entered the legal technology industry in 2015 with the international market in mind. In the two years since, the company has inked deals with an impressive list of law firm clients across the globe, in places such as Australia, New Zealand, Finland and Singapore. But, in CEO Emily Foges' telling, serving this sprawling array meant U.K. employees “jumping on planes all the time.”
Foges told LTN that this “global footprint” meant Luminance needed “a global team.” In its first stage of expansion, the company announced on Nov. 29 the opening of its U.S. headquarters in Chicago. The office will be the company's first international location, and according to a statement from Luminance, was a response to demand from clients in North America.
Luminance decided on Chicago in February, after ALM's Legalweek event in New York. Cravath, Swaine & Moore had been piloting Luminance for several months, and at the event, partner George Schoen appeared alongside Foges on a panel discussing the impact of AI on due diligence. After showcasing the software, Foges said that the company got “such a huge response,” particularly from Chicago firms.
Cravath inked a deal with Luminance in July, but it wasn't the first to work with the contract automation company. In September 2016, Magic Circle firm Slaughter and May signed with Luminance, and it has invested millions in the company over the past two years. In March, the firm took a 5 percent equity stake in Luminance. Meanwhile in Australia, Coors Chambers Westgarth and Gilbert + Tobin have both adopted the technology, as have firms in Italy, Denmark and Singapore.
Luminance plans to continue opening headquarters beyond the U.S. and U.K. as well. It was also announced on Nov. 29, that the company was valued at $50M after closing a series A funding round at $10M.
Luminance plans to use the funds to support its Chicago office as well as further expand operations. Foges said that “step two” in the process will be “sending a scouting mission out to Singapore next year.” This, along with Chicago, means it will be “covered from a time zone perspective” in helping customers.
“We have lots of customers in the [Asia-Pacific] region,” she added. “I want us to have product support, and at present our product support means getting out of bed at two in the morning.”
Indeed, newer legal markets have, in Foges' opinion, been more open to adopting Luminance's technology.
“I didn't expect it to be like that; I thought it would start with the U.K. and maybe the U.S. It's actually gone the other way, the emerging markets have really pushed it and wanted to move quickly,” Foges explained. “U.S. firms haven't addressed the technology opportunity in the same way that the European and Asian firms have.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250