Artificially Intelligent Blockchain of Things: Examining Legal Tech's Biggest Buzzwords
Panelists at ALM CyberSecure 2017 delved into the year's biggest legal technology buzzwords and the hype fueling their popularity.
December 08, 2017 at 08:00 AM
6 minute read
L-R Michael Hazzard, Jones Day; Richard Timbol, Davis Polk; Khurram Gore, Verizon; and Karl Schoen-Rene, Knights of Columbus. Photo: Ian Lopez/ALM Media.
Legal technology has no shortage of buzzwords—think of “TAR” and many others. The latest slew to take the industry by storm were the topic conversation in a Dec. 5 panel at ALM's CyberSecure event in New York.
Titled “What You Need to Know about IoT, AI and the Blockchain: Buzz Words Demystified,” panelists discussed how these technologies are changing legal and other industries, as well as the implications of their increasing use.
|AI—Not Quite 'I Robot,' but a Security Game Changer
The first technology brought under the lens was artificial intelligence (AI), a term that Richard Timbol, CISO at Davis Polk & Wardwell, said he dislikes.
“I don't think the term 'artificial intelligence' is really reflective of the technology they're referring to,” Timbol said. “To me, AI is something you see in 'I Robot.' What we have is advanced programming that learns through systematic adjustments of the inputs and comes out with a smarter result.”
However, Timbol noted that what's frequently touted as AI has been “a game changer for security.”
“The black hats are working in milliseconds,” he said. They have “mass zombie networks of thousands of computers … [and] tons of computational power. And they can make decisions and scan your network and pivot within it.”
This speed is crucial, as human analysts can take days to weeks to find suspicious network activity, Timbol said, noting it's been estimated that it takes 187 days after a breach occurs for it to be detected. “I think AI is going to help that, because it's going to allow the analyst to be a force multiplier.”
Timbol said there's much hype around tools for tasks like moderating firewall hits, as now organizations have “thousands of servers” and “millions of events a day.” He also mentioned AI being used for determining “what's normal traffic, normal behavior in an organization.”
|Betting on Blockchain to Address Supply Chain Kinks
The latest technology to get as much attention as AI has been blockchain. Khurram Gore, associate general counsel at Verizon, described blockchain as “a distributed ledger” with “a bunch of transactions strung together into a record, and that record exists in a whole bunch of places at the same time.” For information to be recorded to the ledger, it must promulgate through the ledger's nodes, operated by individual's with access. “How do we know [information is] right? The most number of nodes says it's right,” Gore explained, thus making it a “consensus model.”
Gore explained that this technology is useful “when people or companies or different organizations don't trust each other. It's a trust solution, meaning that there's a record out there being replicated across different places, and we're going to believe that that record is true.”
And this technology already appears to be bearing results. IBM announced this year that it's working with food suppliers such as Walmart to apply blockchains to the food supply chain. Here, the chain would run through the producer to shipping, storage and retail, helping determine the origins of issues such as E. coli or salmonella contamination.
Blockchains are also frequently discussed in the context of smart contracts, or as Gore put it, “a contract that smartly executes itself.” In these instances, agreements and the ability to execute them can be placed on the blockchain, so when an agreed upon event occurs, money or other assets can be transferred.
While this technology looks to impact everything from finance to issue-spotting, Gore explained that it ultimately asks us to place trust in a technology. Gore noted the possibility of an event stipulated by a smart contract not occurring but the end result still being executed, ultimately leaving the question: What recourse does one have?
|IoT Prompting a Reboot for the Wireless World
The last and perhaps most widely-used technology to be discussed was the internet of things (IoT). Karl Schoen-Rene, director of IT security at Knights of Columbus, discussed the context of organizational security. IoT, he said, is an “example of a technology that has become ubiquitous, like the telephone or personal computer. I believe that the implications of having sensors and basically processors all around us every day leads to a huge increase in the threat window, the ability of bad actors to get at our organizations.”
As an example of how easily this could happen, he noted how two employees at his organization had brought Amazon Alexa devices into the office. Luckily, they were detected by the organization's wireless units and removed.
“It's human beings trying to make their lives more efficient, and I think we will see a decrease in the interest in privacy for the increase in the ease of living your own life,” he said. But from a technical security perspective, this makes it harder to enforce a security perimeter and control what devices are allowed to enter.
Therefore, the security focus shifts from keeping track of devices coming in to controlling the sensitive data itself. Here, Schoen-Rene said, encryption and other security technologies come into play, allowing any data “used in any ways” to be detected by a monitoring system.
|Peering Through the Hype
The three technologies in discussion have generated much hype for being transformative and revolutionary. But how much do they actually live up to expectations?
Timbol noted that the term AI alone is hype, so much that there's currently disillusionment with it. This is because the AI technology organizations are purchasing isn't the silver bullet they may have been expecting. However, he noted, the sheer computing power of AI has “changed the game dramatically.”
With blockchain, Gore said that “we're at the height of the hype cycle.” Yet this has positive implications, as more entrepreneurs can find use cases for the technology, the success of which depends on what Gore called the “social element.”
Meanwhile, IoT technology may just be in the early stages of takeoff. Schoen-Rene said that every manufacturer he knows is already putting sensors in their consumer devices. While they may not know how they'll apply them, they'll possibly be collecting and selling information.
“There are uses of this they haven't even become conceptually aware of yet,” he added.
Gore noted that the tools in in the near future will likely combine all three of these technologies.
“It's a really interesting time, because the cost of entry has gone down, and we're going to see a lot of really great ideas and a lot of terrible ideas that don't succeed. And we'll see them across all three categories,” he added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250