Even Regulation Can't Make Some Organizations Invest More In Cybersecurity
A recent study from Nexia International and CohnReznick found that 20 percent of organizations required by regulation to maintain some form of cyber programming lack a cyber program.
December 12, 2017 at 10:00 AM
6 minute read
Despite a year full of devastating, massive scale breaches, many organizations still lack the cybersecurity infrastructure and training needed to adequately protect them from cyber attacks. In many cases, even the threat of regulatory scrutiny may not be enough to encourage organizations to invest more heavily in cybersecurity resources.
A recent survey coauthored by consulting group Nexia International and professional services firm CohnReznick polled more than 350 organizations and found that 46 percent do not have a formal cybersecurity program; an additional 20 percent of respondents lack a cybersecurity program even when government, industry or consumer regulations require them to have one.
Survey respondents cited time and budgets as their biggest obstacles to implementing organizational cybersecurity: Fifty-one percent noted that lack of time dedicated to cybersecurity issues was an “extreme” challenge for organizations, while an additional 45 percent said the same of limited budgets.
That lack of investment shows up in the kinds of safety precautions many organizations have failed to take. Likewise, many have failed to understand their own cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Twenty percent have not conducted a cybersecurity assessment at all. Only 25 percent offer cybersecurity training to their employees on an annual basis.
Cohn Reznick partner David Rubin found the lack of investment surprising, especially given the current cybersecurity landscape. He noted that regulatory concerns seem to be the biggest incentive to bolster resource investments to cybersecurity.
“The driver of cyber-investment is still regulation rather than data risk management,” he said.
Both regulators and third-party vendors seem to be stepping up their scrutiny of organizational cybersecurity—Rubin sees local cybersecurity regulations and vendor cybersecurity contractual stipulations on the rise. These still may not be enough to get some companies to invest more heavily in their cybersecurity infrastructures and programs.
“It really becomes still a question of how many companies will be willing take the risk that they won't get hit even with those regulations. It's going to take, I think, some companies seeing or industries seeing that regulations are being enforced, or they're losing business for them to take it seriously,” Rubin said.
For attorneys looking to help clients who've shirked their cybersecurity investments, Rubin suggested that having a well-oiled response plan and a gentle push to do more preventative work can help.
“What I do feel they can do is educate their clients. The focus should be to understand their client vulnerabilities, the impact of those vulnerabilities, and what things they can have their clients to do prevent, and get their clients ready in the event that they need to respond so that it's almost a muscle reflex in terms of what they do and how they respond to an incident,” he said.
That preventative work should involve some form of education, Rubin added. “The survey clearly indicated to use that there's not enough training going on,” he said. “Training is a very, very important component to an effective cyber-component. Policies that people are trained on are an effective part of a cyber program,” he said.
Despite a year full of devastating, massive scale breaches, many organizations still lack the cybersecurity infrastructure and training needed to adequately protect them from cyber attacks. In many cases, even the threat of regulatory scrutiny may not be enough to encourage organizations to invest more heavily in cybersecurity resources.
A recent survey coauthored by consulting group Nexia International and professional services firm CohnReznick polled more than 350 organizations and found that 46 percent do not have a formal cybersecurity program; an additional 20 percent of respondents lack a cybersecurity program even when government, industry or consumer regulations require them to have one.
Survey respondents cited time and budgets as their biggest obstacles to implementing organizational cybersecurity: Fifty-one percent noted that lack of time dedicated to cybersecurity issues was an “extreme” challenge for organizations, while an additional 45 percent said the same of limited budgets.
That lack of investment shows up in the kinds of safety precautions many organizations have failed to take. Likewise, many have failed to understand their own cybersecurity vulnerabilities. Twenty percent have not conducted a cybersecurity assessment at all. Only 25 percent offer cybersecurity training to their employees on an annual basis.
Cohn Reznick partner David Rubin found the lack of investment surprising, especially given the current cybersecurity landscape. He noted that regulatory concerns seem to be the biggest incentive to bolster resource investments to cybersecurity.
“The driver of cyber-investment is still regulation rather than data risk management,” he said.
Both regulators and third-party vendors seem to be stepping up their scrutiny of organizational cybersecurity—Rubin sees local cybersecurity regulations and vendor cybersecurity contractual stipulations on the rise. These still may not be enough to get some companies to invest more heavily in their cybersecurity infrastructures and programs.
“It really becomes still a question of how many companies will be willing take the risk that they won't get hit even with those regulations. It's going to take, I think, some companies seeing or industries seeing that regulations are being enforced, or they're losing business for them to take it seriously,” Rubin said.
For attorneys looking to help clients who've shirked their cybersecurity investments, Rubin suggested that having a well-oiled response plan and a gentle push to do more preventative work can help.
“What I do feel they can do is educate their clients. The focus should be to understand their client vulnerabilities, the impact of those vulnerabilities, and what things they can have their clients to do prevent, and get their clients ready in the event that they need to respond so that it's almost a muscle reflex in terms of what they do and how they respond to an incident,” he said.
That preventative work should involve some form of education, Rubin added. “The survey clearly indicated to use that there's not enough training going on,” he said. “Training is a very, very important component to an effective cyber-component. Policies that people are trained on are an effective part of a cyber program,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 2No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 3Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 4Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
- 5Lawyers' Phones Are Ringing: What Should Employers Do If ICE Raids Their Business?
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250