Registered Investment Companies Get More Time to File N-PORT Form Through EDGAR
EDGAR apparently is not secure enough to receive the information, leading to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) decision.
December 19, 2017 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
Registered investment companies have more time to comply with the filing requirement of the N-Port form through the EDGAR system. Filing of N-PORTs through EDGAR will begin in April 2019 for larger-fund groups and in April 2020 for smaller-fund groups, according to Advise Technologies.
The decision comes in the wake of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently announcing that EDGAR experienced a breach in 2016. N-Port, part of the SEC reporting modernization reforms, requires investment companies registered in the US to report calculations assessing risk to changing market conditions.
“EDGAR is not secure enough to receive the information,” Jeanette Turner, managing director and chief regulatory officer at Advise Technologies, told Legaltech News about why the SEC made the decision this month. “The SEC is essentially asking for nine additional months before N-PORT information is submitted via EDGAR. The N-PORT requirement itself is not delayed. Firms must still complete the form. But, instead of submitting the filing via EDGAR, they will hold it in their own records, available to the SEC for exam.”
When making the announcement, SEC Chair Jay Clayton said the action is a “prudent step as we continue our work to uplift EDGAR and other systems and assess our data needs, including how and when we collect market-sensitive data.” He also noted that “larger fund groups maintain—and commission staff have access to—the information required on Form N-PORT.”
“As of the end of 2016, 11,548 of the 17,072 funds registered with the SEC were required to file Form N-PORT,” Turner said. “Form N-PORT includes monthly reporting of portfolio holdings, something the industry considers sensitive.”
When the SEC adopted the rule that created N-PORT, the commission “felt that it would be ready for the June 2018 compliance deadline,” Turner said. “The industry had concerns about the SEC's readiness to protect such information and in July an industry group (ICI) sent a letter to the SEC, expressing concerns around the SEC's ability, 'to protect the valuable and sensitive portfolio holdings information that funds will be required to report monthly,' noting that a hack of Form N-PORT data could make funds vulnerable to predatory trading practices, which would be at the expense of fund shareholders.”
In September, Clayton announced that EDGAR had been hacked. The data breach was initially detected in 2016, but in August 2017, the SEC learned that the information may have been traded on, Turner said.
“The SEC attributed the breach to software vulnerability in the test filing component of EDGAR,” Turner added. “The SEC is working on improving EDGAR and has hired consultants to help. Clayton has assured Congress and the industry that the SEC will not take data unless he is sure that it is secure.”
However, firms should be careful about reading the wrong message from the announcement. “Some firms will see this as a chance to relax and breathe easy,” Turner said. “But they are wrong.”
“Form N-PORT requires heavy lifting up front,” she added. “In order to make the tight 30-day deadline each month, firms must automate data feeds from numerous third parties, and clean up the data so that they can run calculations as needed to answer the questions on the form. This process must be automated, as there is no time to check your work.”
She further cautioned that the SEC's modification “does not alleviate this burden for firms. The modification only mitigates the additional stress of generating an XML that passes validation tests.”
“Firms now have a chance to perfect their automated workflow and their methodologies and calculations without worrying about technical problems,” she advised. “They should take advantage of this window.”
During the first nine months, firms “should generate XMLs and test their systems and workflows even though XML submission is not required. This way they will be ready to go when they must report on EDGAR,” she said. “In addition, due to the modification, during the first nine months of reporting, firms must report both N-PORT and NQ. There is overlap in information reported on these two forms. But N-Q is reported less frequently and with a 60-day deadline (compared to N-PORT's 30-day deadline). For some firms, reporting both forms will be a burden on resources.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gibson Dunn Sued By Crypto Client After Lateral Hire Causes Conflict of Interest
- 2Trump's Solicitor General Expected to 'Flip' Prelogar's Positions at Supreme Court
- 3Pharmacy Lawyers See Promise in NY Regulator's Curbs on PBM Industry
- 4Outgoing USPTO Director Kathi Vidal: ‘We All Want the Country to Be in a Better Place’
- 5Supreme Court Will Review Constitutionality Of FCC's Universal Service Fund
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250