2017: The Year Legal Tech Grew Up
From AI and automation to analytics and law firm M&As, Casetext CEO Jake Heller wraps up the year's most important legal tech trends.
December 20, 2017 at 08:00 AM
5 minute read
Two-thousand and seventeen was a big year for legal tech. As the industry begins to evolve and grow at faster and faster rates, it's more important now than ever for law firms to pay attention to make sure they're harnessing the technologies that will make the biggest impact. The most important legal tech trends of 2017 included:
1. Artificial Intelligence: It became clearer than ever this year that artificial intelligence will have a real impact on many areas of legal practice, reducing the amount of rote work performed by lawyers and freeing them to focus on more strategic issues. Machine learning, which has proven its ability to speed up processes across any number of industries (and perform certain tasks more accurately than humans) has now fully arrived in the legal profession. The ground shifted perceptibly in July, when a true standard-bearer of New York firms, Cravath Swaine Moore, signed with AI-powered Luminance to perform its contract due diligence work. Throughout 2017, AI-powered tools like Kira and Casetext's CARA continued growing in popularity and led to major deals with a number of firms, including several in the AmLaw 100.
2. Automation: In 2017, in-house legal departments demanded automation from their outside counsel to a new degree. And law firms, it appears, are getting the message. According to the Altman Weil 2017 Law Firms in Transition study, 49 percent of firms stated that they are using technology on tasks that can be automated to improve efficiency. Perhaps more significantly, a full 84 percent of law firm respondents believe that trend will be a permanent one.
3. Law Firm Investment in Legal Tech: While VC investment in legal tech may be declining, law firms are waking up to the possibilities that it holds—and putting their own money behind it. Dentons, for instance, has backed an independent accelerator, NextLaw Labs, which calls itself the first legal tech venture created by a law firm. That happened way back in 2015, but similar efforts have multiplied; this year, Orrick Herrington & Sutcliffe created an incubator called Orrick Labs, which “aims to turn lawyers' ideas about how to achieve greater efficiency into reality.” Meanwhile, other firms are trying to bake tech-savvy into their identities. After three months operating under the radar, Atrium LLP publicly launched with the stated goal of building “the technology-first law firm of the future.”
4. Legal Analytics: The global legal analytics market valued at $450 million in 2017 is expected reach $1.8 billion by 2022. This past year—a banner one for the field—witnessed the acquisition of Ravel Lawby LexisNexis and the launch of California-based startup Gavelytics. For litigators, the insights that analytics can provide into judges' ruling patterns could be a game changer.
5. E-Discovery Consolidation: In a trend that has prevailed for multiple years now, consolidation in the legal tech space—among e-discovery providers in particular—continued at a strong clip in 2017. Things tailed off a bit from 2016, a torrid year of deal-making in which there were 36 M&As or investments among e-discovery providers, the three largest of which exceeded $1.5 billion in total value. According to Complex Discovery's tracking, in 2017 thus far there have been 23 mergers or investments. That is still considerable activity, and it may be driven in part by clients' preference for “one stop shops” providing comprehensive e-discovery services. Also playing a role, no doubt, is the fact that acquisitions offer a way for private equity-backed e-discovery providers to maintain strong growth rates in the maturing e-discovery market. You can question whether rampant consolidation in the e-discovery area is a good thing—and some do—but it does not appear to be letting up.
6. Law Firm Consolidation: There were 85 mergers involving U.S. law firms in 2017, according to Altman Weil data—just six shy of the all-time record set in 2015. The full implications of this consolidation for the legal tech industry won't be known for some time. Continued pricing pressure from corporate clients, however, along with firms' need to differentiate themselves in a competitive market, are likely to drive increasing interest among large law firms in technology that can help them serve clients with maximum efficiency.
It's been a busy 2017 in legal tech, and there's no doubt that the industry took significant steps forward over the last year. Going into 2018, it will remain vital for legal tech providers and law firms alike to closely watch the trends shaping it. Those that do will be quicker to spot opportunities that come along.
Jake Heller is the founder and CEO of Casetext. Before starting Casetext, Jake was a litigator at Ropes & Gray. He's a Silicon Valley native, and has been programming since childhood. For more information about CARA, Casetext's AI-backed legal research assistant, visit info.casetext.com/cara-ai.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1How I Made Partner: 'Take Every Opportunity to Get Involved in the Business Side of the Firm,' Says Alyssa Domzal of Ballard Spahr
- 2People in the News—Feb. 5, 2025—Eckert Seamans, Rawle & Henderson
- 3Librarian's Termination Violated First Amendment Protections, Lawsuit Claims
- 4Choice-of-Law Issues as the UCC 2022 Amendments Come into Effect
- 5Six Benefits of Taking an Opposing Medical Expert’s Deposition
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250