Many Businesses Are Expected to Move Forward With Machine Learning in 2018
Industries are in the early stages of AI adoption, but many organizations are in search of the professionals needed to bolster their machine-learning efforts.
December 28, 2017 at 09:50 AM
4 minute read
There's no shortage of technology providers offering machine-learning solutions to age-old business problems. Now, as organizations in various industries continue hiring for tech-focused roles, 2018 may be the year machine learning truly takes off.
Among the roles increasingly sought out by businesses is that of the data scientist. As reported by Forbes in spring 2017, an IBM study found that by 2020, there will be nearly 62,000 jobs for data scientists and similar positions in the U.S. And according to Andy Abbott, chief technology officer and co-founder of contract review technology company Heretik, these scientists will undertake more research in 2018 so that companies remain competitive.
“This past year we have seen a significant influx in attention on machine learning and data science overall,” Abbott told Legaltech News, leading to increased focus among companies, many of which, he says, are now hiring their first data scientists.
“They typically do not know the goals of building out a data science team, but fear they will be at a competitive disadvantage if they do not begin to research them,” Abbott said. “I think the data science industry is still very much at its infancy and will continue to be throughout 2018. However, we will begin to see its real impact as its deployment continually increases.”
IBM's report found that the demand for data and analytics roles depends on the industry, with the greatest demand being in finance and insurance and professional services. In the past several years, the legal industry has seen a steady increase in data science roles, with law firms such as Drinker Biddle & Reath and Littler Mendelson staffing data professionals.
For modern legal service delivery, you now not only need lawyers, but also data scientists, UnitedLex vice president of legal solutions Peter Krakaur told LTN. He also noted that his company will be looking at how artificial intelligence “augments delivery of legal services” and how that will change as the industry “shifts towards more automation and smarter systems.”
Abbott also said that international government and industry regulatory changes may also drive a spike in machine learning.
“Our clients are quickly trying to prepare for the impact resulting from what's happening in Europe with Brexit and GDPR [General Data Protection Regulation], and also upcoming accounting practice changes such as ASC 606/IFRS 15 and IFRS 16,” Abbott said.
Also, there is an increasing “burden on legal departments, transactional and corporate practices, attorneys and legal operational staff” to implement machine-learning solutions.
“The amount of material that requires diligent review has surpassed the capacity of the manual workflows reviewing it and [is] similar to where e-discovery was 10 years ago,” Abbott said.
In addition to implementing these methods internally, businesses are requiring external counsel to use machine learning during review.
“Corporations understand the significant benefits of using machine learning, including the reduction of risk resulting from human errors and the increase of review coverage when time is a constraint, as it often is,” Abbott said. “Corporations are also increasingly unwilling to pay steep fees for repetitive simple operational tasks like contract abstraction. They are, on the other hand, comfortable incurring higher costs for more strategically impactful work, something machine learning is empowering attorneys to focus on.”
Yet machine learning implementation isn't always met with open arms. Abbott said that a considerable challenge to machine learning adoption is “trust,” noting that part of product development at Heretik, which leverages machine learning, is geared toward addressing this point. This includes having “an open conversation” with users and providing “additional functionality” such as “checks and balances in the user interface” and “detailed audit logging of analysis” to ensure trust.
Still, Abbott pointed out that industries are “very early in the life cycle of AI and machine learning.”
“During this beginning phase we'll see many attempts to mimic and simply automate existing processes as they exist today. However, those processes were developed and perfected with the tools at hand. As we introduce new tools and techniques, facilitated by machine learning, processes will evolve. Maturity will have reached the industry when we can look at a process and see no resemblance to how it was done it the past,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1White & Case KOs Claims Against Voltage Inc. in Solar Companies' Trade Dispute
- 2Avantia Publicly Announces Agentic AI Platform Ava
- 3Shifting Sands: May a Court Properly Order the Sale of the Marital Residence During a Divorce’s Pendency?
- 4Joint Custody Awards in New York – The Current Rule
- 5Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250