Could Gaming Help Close the Access to Justice Gap?
A joint project between legal aid organizations in Connecticut, New Hampshire, Massachusetts and Maine is hoping games can help distribute important legal information to pro se litigants.
January 03, 2018 at 10:00 AM
5 minute read
As the legal industry writ large continues to consider opportunities to close the access to justice gap, four state legal aid groups have proposed an unconventional approach: gaming.
Legal aid organizations in Maine, Connecticut, Massachusetts and New Hampshire a few weeks ago launched “RePresent,” an interactive online game to familiarize pro se litigants with court proceedings. The game, available both online and as a free downloadable game on mobile devices, walks players through the process of preparing for and representing oneself in small claims court.
Game players are responsible for helping the game's main character prepare for his hearing, breaking the process into small steps that help build his confidence for his hearing. Gameplay reveals a surprisingly large number of tasks pro se litigants must complete to prepare adequately, from the information they must file with the court clerk's office down to just printing directions and parking instructions for their courthouse they must appear at.
The game, now in its second iteration, was originally launched in 2016 as part of a partnership between Statewide Legal Services of Connecticut and Northeastern University's NuLaw Lab. The groups, funded by a Legal Services Corporation (LSC) Technology Initiative Grant, aimed to see whether game play could help prepare pro se litigants for small claims hearings.
Kathy Daniels, IT administrator for the Statewide Legal Services of Connecticut, helped put together the original game. She said the idea for the game came from a staff brainstorm about how to familiarize pro se litigants with what tends to be a wildly confusing court experience for the uninitiated.
“We wanted to expose them to the experience in a safe environment where they could practice,” Daniels said.
Dan Jackson, executive director of Northeastern's NuLawLab, explained that the game draws on research around “serious games,” games typically designed for training and skill building.
“There is a body of work that demonstrates that game play is in fact one of the most effective ways for humans to learn. It's how we began to learn things as children, which is how we learn a lot of things like social interactions, but also a lot of actual skill building as well. I think often we make the mistake of thinking that after we move to adulthood that the game part, the play part, is actually no longer important,” Jackson said.
“The goal is to create a gameplay experience that will help people who have to go to court to represent themselves without a lawyer get some basic foundational knowledge, and also some basic foundational skillbuilding they wouldn't otherwise get,” Jackson added.
Nearby states saw a lot of value in the platform. Statewide Legal Services of Connecticut, Pine Tree Legal Assistance in Maine, Massachusetts Law Reform Institute (MLRI) and Legal Advice and Referral Center each tailored the game to their specific state law for the recent launch of the second iteration.
“Having the opportunity to do something like this that is way more interactive than our educational materials have ever had a chance to be in the past was really exciting,” Jack Haycock, client focused technology innovator at Pine Tree Legal Services, told LTN. “Having a chance to do something I think really innovative like this will work, for people maybe in a way that our text materials or even videos might not work. Being able to interact with the learning process can be a really powerful and different medium for people to learn,” he later added.
The groups are excited about the game's mobile accessibility, a new feature in the recent launch. Both Daniels and Haycock noted that about 70 percent of the traffic on their respective websites come from mobile devices. The migration to mobile also featured heavily in an LSC report released last year examining the online presence of legal aid organizations.
Jackson expects that the mobile component will help far more users access the game. “Not very many people spend time on browsers anymore,” he said.
Both the Statewide Legal Services of Connecticut and Pine Tree Legal Assistance Groups plan to release a version of the game that provides information to renters looking to avoid eviction shortly.
“Our goal is really to demystify just going to court and who the players are and what to do, and those tips really transcend for areas of civil litigation. Our goal is to identify what the pitfalls are, then help pro se litigants prepare for those in advance and know what they are,” Helen Meyer, development director at Pine Tree Legal Services, said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Judge Denies Sean Combs Third Bail Bid, Citing Community Safety
- 2Republican FTC Commissioner: 'The Time for Rulemaking by the Biden-Harris FTC Is Over'
- 3NY Appellate Panel Cites Student's Disciplinary History While Sending Negligence Claim Against School District to Trial
- 4A Meta DIG and Its Nvidia Implications
- 5Deception or Coercion? California Supreme Court Grants Review in Jailhouse Confession Case
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250