Embracing Artificial Intelligence at Your Law Firm
These three keys can go a long way towards helping introduce artificial intelligence at your law firm.
January 03, 2018 at 08:00 AM
5 minute read
Advances in technology are transforming entire industries: Airbnb and Uber have wreaked havoc on the hotel and taxi industries; Netflix and online-streaming have turned the media industry on its head; self-driving cars are set to revolutionize the automotive industry.
Artificial intelligence (AI) and other disruptive technologies are beginning to gain momentum in the legal profession and may ultimately transform the delivery model for legal services. Lawyers tend to be resistant to change and risk-averse, but those who see technology as an opportunity—rather than a threat—will reap the rewards, and those who cling to the status quo run the risk of being left behind.
So how do you convince lawyers of the benefits of AI? Here are 3 best practices.
Think Like a Lawyer When Framing the Argument for AI
Despite the obvious benefits of AI, persuading lawyers to embrace it can be a major challenge. Lawyers look at the world from a different perspective. To maximize buy-in from key decision-makers, consider framing the AI argument in a manner that recognizes (and is tailored to) lawyers' particular idiosyncrasies.
First, lawyers are generally skeptical and resistant to change—it's part of their job description. Lawyers are trained to rely on precedent. So consider framing AI as a complement to existing processes rather than a wholesale replacement of lawyers. Acknowledge that lawyers are here to stay, and that the way they analyze and solve problems is valuable. But explain that lawyers who leverage AI can provide greater value and an improved service offering to clients.
Second, lawyers are client-oriented and deadline-driven. So focus on the efficiency benefits of AI. Lawyers can use AI to handle the more laborious and time-intensive tasks, freeing up time to focus on higher-value work. AI can help lawyers deliver services to their clients faster and more affordably, without sacrificing quality. Shorter turnaround times are an easy sell. In addition to focusing on time saved, frame the argument as one of growth and competitive advantage. For early adopters, artificial intelligence might mean a broader range of clients and new sources of revenue.
Third, lawyers are careful, risk averse and detail-oriented. So position AI as a highly reliable second set of eyes. For example, in the context of a complex, document-intensive litigation matter, AI can unearth key documents that human eyes might miss. During the due diligence phase of a sophisticated corporate transaction, AI can identify material contractual provisions with a high degree of accuracy.
Run a Pilot
Conducting a pilot will allow your organization to test the capabilities of the particular AI product, ensure that its features are well understood, and propose refinements to optimize the product's performance.
At Aird & Berlis, we recently completed a pilot project of an AI tool called Diligen. Diligen uses AI to support the due diligence process typical in M&A transactions. In the transactional context, the due diligence process is critical, painstaking, and time sensitive. One important aspect of the due diligence process in M&A transactions is the review of material contracts of the target company. We were looking for ways to streamline this aspect of due diligence by combining automated contract review with collaborative project management. During the pilot period, a client came to us on a Friday evening with a significant due diligence project and a tight deadline—we had until Monday morning to complete our review and provide a detailed report. We were successful expediting the review and meeting the deadline, without sacrificing the quality of our work.
Educate Other Stakeholders and Champion the Benefits
Both during and after a successful pilot, it is critical to educate other stakeholders throughout your organization (beyond the key decision-makers who approved the pilot). As with the key decision-makers, start by dispelling myths about what AI is (and is not) all about. In the legal profession, AI is not about replacing people with machines. It's about using technology as a complement to what lawyers do. It's about allowing lawyers to focus on providing strategic legal and business advice. It's about saving time and money, optimizing resources and delivering value to clients. It's about retaining existing clients and winning market share. It's about reducing risk.
Any new technology needs advocates who will champion its benefits. I strongly believe that AI will transform the legal industry, and I encourage you to champion AI within your organization. AI presents a golden opportunity for lawyers and law firms to transform the way they deliver services to clients. Soon enough, ignoring this opportunity won't be an option.
Aaron Baer is a lawyer in the Corporate/Commercial Group of Aird & Berlis LLP, a leading business law firm based in Toronto.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Family Court 2024 Roundup: Part I
- 2In-House Lawyers Are Focused on Employment and Cybersecurity Disputes, But Looking Out for Conflict Over AI
- 3A Simple 'Trial Lawyer' Goes to the Supreme Court
- 4Clifford Chance Adds Skadden Rainmaker in London
- 5Latham, Kirkland and Paul Weiss Climb UK M&A Rankings
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250