Catalyst Launches Analytics Platform
The e-discovery group is entering a crowded analytics market hoping to carve out a niche around customization.
January 10, 2018 at 11:03 AM
3 minute read
The rapid growth of e-discovery projects has made project management analytics a new staple of e-discovery work, both for helping project managers oversee and track e-discovery projects and to project accurate costs to the companies financing these projects.
E-discovery and regulatory compliance group Catalyst this week launched its own analytics tool for its corporate e-discovery platform. Catalyst Analytics, the new tool, will feature real-time project data across multiple matters and custodians in a centralized database. The tool can also schedule automated reports to stakeholders via email with any set frequency.
Jennifer Davies, product manager for Catalyst Analytics, explained that the platform is an outgrowth of some of the work Catalyst did to prepare biannual reports for one of the organization's biggest clients. “It would take a lot of resources using manual labor and Excel spreadsheets, tools that were more of a time-consuming process,” she noted. As a result, the company developed a set of templates and automation tools for those clients to expedite the process.
Davies noted that the analytics tool, now available for a wider audience, aims to serve up key analytics to multiple different kinds of users, from the litigation support staff up to the chief legal officer. “Some people are managing multiple matters at the litigation level, understanding where all the action is happening,” Davies explained, adding that these people may want to view all the matters they oversee in one place. “Chief legal officers, the info they're interested in is on a much larger scale, not as granular.”
The expansion of analytics tools and ever-increasing pressure from business leaders to curb legal spend has forced many e-discovery shops to move from the more ad hoc management systems—anything from Post-its to printouts to Excel spreadsheets—to more formalized analytics structures.
“Within more mature legal departments, it's definitely a higher demand to have more real-time information. It helps them make better-informed decisions,” Davies noted.
Catalyst is certainly aware that the analytics platform is entering a fairly crowded field, vying for space somewhere between the analytics tools that corporate legal departments have developed in-house and the existing out-of-the-box tools on the market. The company is hoping to differentiate itself by bringing its market insight to bear on both the tool's product design and professional service offerings, as well as tailoring its analytics services to specific clients.
“We really have that capability to customize to whatever the client wants,” Davies added.
In recent years, Catalyst seems to have directed much of its technology development toward its e-discovery tools. The organization was an early pioneer of technology assisted review (TAR), using predictive algorithms and other machine-learning techniques to identify key documents. The company launched its Enterprise Insight platform for corporate counsel just last year, and has embarked on strategic partnerships with TotalDiscovery and American Discovery to flesh out its offerings across the EDRM spectrum.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250