With 'Legal Design Thinking,' ALT Eyes New Type of Legal Tech Conference
The Association of Legal Technologists' first ever conference will include interactive sessions where attendees get hands-on experience designing new legal technology platforms and processes.
January 18, 2018 at 10:44 AM
4 minute read
The nascent Association of Legal Technologists (ALT) wants to upend the way legal technology conferences are done. Announced in September 2017 following the contentious reorganization of the International Legal Technology Association's (ILTA) executive team, ALT styles itself as more of a think tank and networking space than a traditional legal technology association.
And with ALT's announcement of its first conference, named “ctrl-ALT-del, Networking Rebooted” in Scottsdale, Arizona, from February 11-13, 2018, how the organization intends to stand out is coming into focus: an overarching theme of “legal design thinking.”
Kelli Kohout, chief administrative officer at Davis Wright Tremaine, explained that legal design thinking is the brainchild of Margaret Hagan, director of the Legal Design Lab and a lecturer at Stanford Institute of Design, who will be the conference's keynote speaker.
“Margaret Hagan's work for the last few years really has been teaching students who are coming out of law schools and others who attend her design school how to address legal problems and come up with a creative solution,” Kohout explained.
Such thinking looks at how to solve a legal problem, from access to justice to profitably managing cases on a fixed fee basis, by designing new processes or legal technology platforms. The goal is to be easy for legal end users—whether they be lawyers or support staff—to implement, use and manage.
Kohout, who is a part of her firm's innovation initiative to develop legal solutions, said that such legal design skills are necessary in the current legal market because attorneys are “all being asked to think differently in order for our firms to remain relevant.”
For Judi Flournoy, chief information officer at Kelley Drye, such thinking does not solely focus on how to create new processes or platforms, but also on understanding legal's current workflows and operational needs. She explained that legal design thinking requires one to “understand how people do their work and why people do the work the way they do, by talking to them, by observing them, by asking them questions, by engaging them directly.”
The emphasis on engagement, however, expands just beyond legal design thinking. The ALT conference, after all, aims to be a hands-on experience for many of its attendees.
“What the attendees at ALT can expect is a really focused, interactive experience,” Flournoy said. “If they are coming just to listen, this might not be the conference for them. We will break out from the beginning of the keynote, and we will be teaching some of the processes that Margaret teaches at the design school.”
Kohout added that in addition to “brainstorming sessions and prototyping” potential technology platforms, attendees will be working user experience concepts by creating stakeholder maps and journey maps as well.
After the keynote, the conference will be split into two tracks. While the first, “The Changing Legal Landscape,” will have sessions examining how the legal industry is changing and why legal design thinking is needed, the second track, “DevOps” will “be focused more toward a technical audience” with hands-on workshops, Flournoy said.
She explained that DevOps is a continuation of legal design thinking, and it will look at using a certain methodology to design and implement “repeatable processes with minimal disruption that can be easily understood and reused over and over again, regardless of whether it's a Windows 10 deployment or another system.”
Rick Hellers, nQueue president and CEO and one of the founding members of ALT, noted that the organization expects the conference to be attended by managerial and technology-focused professionals in the legal world, including CFOs, CIOs, IT directors and directors of technology. Hellers added that attorneys from law firms will also attend, and he is optimistic that others from the corporate world will join the crowd as well.
In addition to professionals from law firms and potentially legal departments, the conference will also seek to include a number of legal technology providers. Hellers, who calls these companies “strategic partners,” noted that they will be there to participate in the workshops and sessions alongside other attendees.
“For us, it's not about, 'Let's get as many strategic partners as we can because they'll pay a lot of money and buy a booth,'” he said. “Our strategic partners are not there to sell. They are there to develop relationships; they are there to add to the conversation.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250