Harvard Law School Students Create Evisort to Improve Contract Review
Evisort's algorithms analyze language in contracts, and can classify and categorize the content.
January 22, 2018 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Not every lesson learned at Harvard Law School takes place in a classroom. One startup, Evisort, was created by Harvard Law School students who saw the need to bring efficiency to the analysis and review of legal documents.
Originally, the students were not even planning to start a company. But they began working on Evisort's development after speaking with attorneys who told them about the inefficiencies found in the legal industry, especially as the volume of data skyrockets.
Evisort's algorithms analyze language in contracts, and can classify and categorize the content. The Harvard students realized that by using artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms, Evisort could help enterprises manage contracts across organizations via machine learning and AI. They used the Harvard Innovation Lab (i-lab) to further develop their theories.
Evisort was built in conjunction with graduate students and researchers at MIT. Among the AI techniques in use are deep learning, neural networks, as well as custom-built models. As a result, accurate data is provided much quicker, and the improved process frees up attorneys so they can provide legal judgment when reviewing documents.
Jerry Ting, Evisort's co-founder and CEO, told Legaltech News, “Our algorithms were developed by our team members, beginning with our first proof of concept nearly two years ago. Since then, we've built up a suite of algorithms aimed at tackling the different types of data within contracts, and a platform that allows users to leverage the powerful algorithms we run on their contracts.
“We've been supported by lawyers all around the country who've provided input, feedback, and even pressure-tested our platform for us, to ensure our development was of the highest caliber,” he added.
Ting said that companies “struggle to manage their legal documents. Evisort removes the need for expensive, tedious, and inaccurate human review.”
Operational data is extracted from scanned documents to help general counsel, controllers, sales professionals, and other company staff, Ting added. Among the departments which can benefit from the technology are legal, compliance, accounting and finance.
“These are highly trained, highly paid, and intelligent people who are spending their time searching for documents, copying and pasting, and scrolling—tasks that a computer could do,” Ting said. “At the same time, lawyers, especially in-house, are operating on limited resources and are stretched thin.
“So we set out to build a platform that could augment their tasks, allowing them to focus on the important, analytical, and complex issues facing them while automating the tedious repetitive tasks, like looking for provisions, dates, and specific terms,” he said.
Contract review becomes faster and more accurate through Evisort, the company added in a release. It allows for large-scale contract review processes. Companies also will have access to more data.
“With Evisort's six layers of artificial intelligence, going from the type of contract to the specific termination provision, users can mix and match what they look for across entire corpuses of data,” Ting said.
Also, it aims to cut down on inefficiency and lost revenue. “Right now, a lot of the data within contracts are dead, lost in scanned PDF documents where the only way to access the data is by manually reading the documents,” Ting said. “Data that could drive negotiations, pricing, and strategy are lost. Other data that they rely on … takes time, and key details may be missed, like in the M&A due diligence process. Billions of dollars of revenue are lost because of missed renewals and upsell opportunities for sales teams, data that could be easily accessed and processes that could be easily automated using Evisort's powerful AI modules.”
Currently, the Evisort platform is in the market and is in active use by clients. According to the company, it has already been tested on over a million contracts for accuracy and scalability.
Moreover, Evisort provides a range of consulting services, such as on document organization, creating a competitive business advantage through AI, moving to the cloud, and offering customized training programs. “Lawyers across every company are struggling to find a way to manage their contracts, and we're excited to be tackling the problem during such an exciting time,” Ting said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Avantia Publicly Announces Agentic AI Platform Ava
- 2Shifting Sands: May a Court Properly Order the Sale of the Marital Residence During a Divorce’s Pendency?
- 3Joint Custody Awards in New York – The Current Rule
- 4Paul Hastings, Recruiting From Davis Polk, Adds Capital Markets Attorney
- 5Chancery: Common Stock Worthless in 'Jacobson v. Akademos' and Transaction Was Entirely Fair
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250