Collaborate or Perish: Why Legal Change Necessitates New Collaboration Processes
A Jan. 31 LegalCIO panel will explore how smart law firms set themselves apart with the efficiency and transparency afforded by collaboration technology.
January 23, 2018 at 11:00 AM
5 minute read
We hear it annually, especially around the turn of the year in terms of retrospectives and predictions: This is the year of change. But is each year really the year that everything changes? Perhaps the answer is yes.
“The legal industry has been talking about change for many years, talking about disruption,” explains Justin Hectus, chief information officer and chief information security officer at law firm Keesal, Young & Logan. “Sometimes it's like boiling a frog: It seems like that change is coming really slowly, but when you look back, it's been pretty dramatic.”
Perhaps the most dramatic of changes in recent years is technology that improves not just the way individual attorneys work, but how all members of the legal team interact with one another. As collaboration tools become the norm, efficiency and transparency in the legal services delivery model have become paramount—and for the smart law firms, they provide a way to stand out from their peers.
The “Driving Digital Transformation and Innovation to Help Improve Collaboration and Productivity” panel during the LegalCIO conference at Legalweek New York will aim to help those collaboration-savvy firms stand out even further. The panel, moderated by HighQ's Stuart Barr, will include two members of tech-savvy firms (Hectus and Reed Smith's Lucy Dillon), the other side of the transaction with corporate legal (Spotify's Jennifer McCarron), and a legal technology expert (Michigan State's Daniel Linna).
Hectus notes that at its core, client demands haven't changed: Corporate clients want the best, most cost-effective service possible. How firms get there, though, is a different story in today's climate.
“I think it's important to note that client demands really haven't changed at their core. They still want the best overall result at the lowest overall cost with the least amount of friction. Really what's changed, and in some ways really dramatically, is the prescriptive role clients play in telling law firms their expectations in how legal services are delivered,” Hectus explained.
Barr agreed, saying that while some forward-thinking firms were asking these questions on their own, often today, clients are driving these changes for the firms they work with.
“It tends to start from the big corporate clients who have very large spend across a portfolio of firms that they work with. We see it in the U.K. in particular with Barclays bank,” the London-based Barr said. “They put their panel firms under a huge amount of pressure to reduce costs, to adopt smarter ways of working, to adopt legal project management techniques, fixed fees, capped fees and so forth. And we're seeing that type of thing happening in the U.S. as well.”
That demand has led to firms changing—often by necessity. “And if they don't do it, they're going to miss out on a piece of work to a competitor that is doing it,” Barr explained. “You've got that scenario where if one firm starts doing it or a significant cohort of firms start doing it, everyone else kind of has to, or else they become uncompetitive. And I think that's the phase we're at now.”
Tapping into that conversation can be a major key to driving the necessary change to actually adopt these tools, even among attorneys that might initially be reluctant. Hectus said it's a matter of socializing technology and having a culture that appreciates it.
He noted, “Voluntary adoption is always predicated on demonstrable value. For us, that formula has always started with communication on how a new technology or a new client initiative equates to client benefits, and how that in turn equates to personal or firm benefits. Sometimes, that's as simple as saying, 'Hey, this is easier than what I did before,' and other times it might be, 'This is just better or more consistent than how I did it before.'”
Once the innovation begins, though, it can also reap benefits down the road. Hectus told Legaltech News the story of a conversation he had at last year's LegalCIO event, with NetApp's Connie Brenton. That conversation led to his firm developing an early dispute resolution workflow, which it later turned around and used as a major win for a banking client.
“It's crazy if you think about it,” Hectus said. “A client challenges a law firm to use a process improvement automation tool to increase efficiency, and less than a year later, that law firm is transforming processes that they're undertaking with clients in completely different industries using the same tools. That's pretty exciting. Those sort of halo effects are one of the most exciting unexpected consequences of these initiatives.”
Sound intriguing? Many CIOs would agree, but it's only possible when collaboration technology becomes more than just a one-off tool—Barr says that an overall “openness to change is fundamental to success.”
“It's across-the-board change,” he added. “You can't just stick a Band-Aid on it and say, 'Well if we just buy this AI engine, we're going to be massively more efficient.' In actual fact, I think many of the key changes and efficiencies that will be gained are not necessarily through artificial intelligence engines replacing humans, but making humans more efficient and optimizing their processes.”
The LegalCIO “Driving Digital Transformation and Innovation to Help Improve Collaboration and Productivity” panel is set to take place at 10:30 a.m. Jan. 31 at Legalweek New York at the New York Midtown Hilton.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
- 2Jackson Lewis Leaders Discuss Firms Innovator Efforts, From Prompt-a-Thons to Gen AI Pilots
- 3Trump's DOJ Files Lawsuit Seeking to Block $14B Tech Merger
- 4'No Retributive Actions,' Kash Patel Pledges if Confirmed to FBI
- 5A Texas Lawyer Just Rose to the Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250