BYU's LawX Rolls Out Complaint Answering Aid Aimed at Debt Collection
SoloSuit, an online tool aimed at helping Utahns who cannot afford legal services respond to debt collection lawsuits, is a result of the first semester of BYU Law School's legal design lab.
January 24, 2018 at 11:00 AM
4 minute read
In the state of Utah, debt collectors have filed 330,000 lawsuits in the last five years, more than all other types of lawsuits combined. Of those sued for a debt, 98.5 percent don't hire an attorney, which is understandable given that the median amount in controversy is just $874. But as a result, the default rate for debt collection is over 80 percent.
This is more than just a monetary problem, according to Brigham Young University (BYU) law professor and practicing attorney Kimball Parker. It's a direct result of a confusing complaint system that left many receiving notices confused.
“The summons tells you that you're supposed to answer, but there's no instruction on how to answer,” Parker explained. “It just says, 'You need to respond.' So people have no idea how to respond, and it's not intuitive. If somebody doesn't tell you how to do it, there's no way to possibly figure it out.”
So Parker and his class of second and third year law students decided to help. In fall 2017, The J. Reuben Clark Law School at BYU in Provo, Utah, introduced the LawX legal design lab, aimed at applying technology to close the access to justice gap. The result of its first semester of work is SoloSuit, an online tool aimed at helping Utahns who cannot afford legal services respond to debt collection lawsuits.
The free website, shown to Legaltech News last week shortly before launch, operates like a streamlined decision tree. The simple interface asks users simple questions aimed to strip away as much legalese as possible, such as “How many numbers are on the paper” as compared to “How many allegations are against you.” Following some initial questions to determine the court in question and the attorney suing the user, the website runs through each allegation by asking users to respond to each complaint (with language such as “This statement is completely true” rather than “Admit”), which is then translated to formal legal language on the backend. Finally, the tool creates a PDF and helps the user identify the correct place to send the printed document.
Parker said that the SoloSuit website itself was created with help from outside programmers, following lessons in design thinking from IBM programmers at the beginning of the semester. The ultimate goal, he explained, was as easy a process, especially after the class interviewed many people facing these debts that felt overwhelmingly helpless.
“We thought about, what situations have we been in where we felt completely overwhelmed? And the one that we came back to was tax. If you're not filing a 1040-EZ, taxes are completely baffling. If I didn't have TurboTax, I don't know what I'd do. … So we said that the surety one gets from TurboTax, that's what we want for people. Because the underlying feeling we found from interviewing these debtors was hopelessness.”
The response has been positive so far. Parker said the class has worked to get SoloSuit listed as a resource on Utah state court websites, and the SoloSuit team is also working with search engine optimization (SEO) experts to make accessing the tool as easy as possible.
“There are essentially no resources that walk someone through answering a debt collection lawsuit. This is going from zero resources essentially to what we think is a good resource,” Parker said.
And crucially, the platform could have applicability outside of Utah as well. Parker noted that Alaska state courts are rolling out the website as a response to its own debt collection issues later in 2018, and an Arizona nonprofit is looking to adapt the website for eviction cases. Parker said, “We think we can apply this to every single state, and with little effort. … It's just a document automation software.”
This platform might be just the beginning for BYU's LawX, however. Parker said the school's administration is excited by the results of the first semester's work, and LawX will be aiming to tackle a different problem this fall.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1How We Won: Samsung Defeats Data Breach Class Action
- 2With Florida’s Lateral Hiring Remaining Steady in 2024, Here’s the Top Hires Throughout the State
- 3Capital Markets Partner Rejoins O’Melveny Ahead of Expected Uptick in Demand
- 4Pharma Company Faces Breach-of-Contract Claim Over $1.3 Million in Unpaid Invoices
- 5KPMG Law Seeks Alternative Business License, Shaking Up Legal Status Quo
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250