The E-Discovery Market May Not Be Consolidating As Fast As Everyone Thinks
Data collected by ComplexDiscovery found that M&A activity in the e-discovery space dipped in 2017, the largest yearly decline in the market since 2013.
January 24, 2018 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
Many have predicted the impending maturation of the e-discovery market, but while the market is feeling smaller and smaller to both buyers and vendors, the rate of consolidation in the e-discovery space slowed noticeably in 2017.
Gibson Dunn litigation partner Gareth Evans told LTN that market consolidation was a significant part of the e-discovery landscape in 2017. “There's this M&A feeding frenzy going on, and it's been going on for a while, but it seemed to even pick up the pace in 2017,” he said.
However, recently uncovered data around e-discovery's mergers and acquisitions might tell a slightly different story. Research compiled by Rob Robinson of Complex Discovery on the number of announced mergers and acquisitions in e-discovery shows that 2017 saw less, not more, consolidation than 2016. The decline in M&A activity, from 36 total M&A events in 2016 to just 24 in 2017, is the most significant drop in this space since 2013.
The year's first three months saw markedly little M&A activity, with only 3 major investments announced, but seemed to pick up through the end of the year, with 10 investments over the last quarter of the year.
Robinson tracked data from public e-discovery consolidation announcements, although he noted that not all M&A activity is made public.
The year still bore some notable M&A activity for e-discovery groups. OpenText's acquisition of Guidance Software last August was valued around $222 million, Morae Legal and Clutch Group announced a merger, and Xact Data Discovery, Lighthouse eDiscovery and Advanced Discovery each acquired competitor e-discovery groups.
The dip in M&A activity could just be a standard market fluctuation. Indeed, 2018 has already seen at least two different instances of M&A and investment in the e-discovery space, with JLL Partners' acquisition of Xact Data Discovery earlier this month and accounting firm Eide Bailey's acquisition of Utah-based Decipher Forensics.
Consultants have pointed to a wide set of potential reasons for a consolidating market. E-discovery vendors are increasingly charged with transnational projects that can be difficult for small shops to manage, and they now face new efficiency and data compliance scrutiny from corporate legal department customers.
“To answer those questions effectively required an outlay of capital,” Consilio CEO Andrew Macdonald previously told LTN.
Adding another wrinkle to the consolidation forces in e-discovery is the fact that technology startups, who often rely on the notion that better technology brings with it the potential for market disruption, have struggled to get potentially better technology noticed in an already crowded e-discovery field. Macdonald noted that while “there's been a lot of really cool technology,” many smaller companies struggle to scale that technology out.
E-discovery companies likely to come out on top, Macdonald said, “may not be the best software that is going to emerge, but it's the best funded, has the best capital structure and has the best discipline about how it's going to grow.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250