ROSS Intelligence Unveils Case Analysis Tool EVA
ROSS Intelligence's new AI tool, unveiled at Legalweek New York 2018, is an attempt to simplify case studies, research and citations.
January 29, 2018 at 02:26 PM
2 minute read
At the “Use Cases and Applications of AI in Legal Services” session at Legalweek New York's AI Bootcamp, legal technology company ROSS Intelligence revealed a new piece of artificial intelligence technology as a companion to its pre-existing intelligence tool: a case analysis tool named EVA.
The goal of EVA is to make case research, citations and studies as easy as possible. It is available now on ROSS Intelligence's website, and the company is releasing it for free—or at least, just for signing up to the company's website.
Among the tool's features is a drag-and-drop tool that allows for upload of a brief in seconds. Using artificial intelligence technology, EVA then sorts through citations within the brief and isolates negatively treated cases. It can also find cases that have similar language, or users can ask a question in natural language and receive a response with citations.
On the back end, EVA can generate Bluebook citations, as well as case studies that are themselves searchable. It also has the ability to create what ROSS calls “context-specific fact summaries,” or parsing down a case into an easily digestible block of text.
ROSS co-founder Andrew Arruda called the technology a “game changer” to a crowd at Legalweek New York.
The release of EVA comes just months after ROSS announced an $8.7 million Series A funding round led by iNovia Capital. From its inception, ROSS has fast become a staple in the legal world. In 2016, Baker & Hostetler became the first Big Law firm to bring the technology in-house, specifically for use for bankruptcy matters.
In November 2017, ROSS also announced a partnership with Northwestern University's Pritzker School of Law, to allow students to use the technology and understand its effect on the practice of law.
With the launch EVA, ROSS follows fellow legal technology company Casetext into the case analysis market. In 2017, Casetext's CARA (Case Analysis Research Assistant) platform launched an AI-powered Brief Finder which, similar to EVA, features drag-and-box upload functionality and the ability to easily generate relevant citations and briefs.
Casetext closed a $12 million Series B funding round in March 2017, led by Canvas Ventures.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250