Erin Nealy Cox: How Cyber Background Helps as US Attorney
Erin Nealy Cox, now the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Texas, comes from a cybersecurity background with McKinsey & Co. and Stroz Friedberg, along with the public sector.
February 08, 2018 at 01:00 PM
5 minute read
In November 2017, Erin Nealy Cox became the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Texas. Perhaps unique for a U.S. attorney, she has extensive background in cybersecurity, having worked as a senior adviser at McKinsey & Co. in the cybersecurity and risk practice; as an assistant U.S, attorney in the Northern District of Texas, where she prosecuted cyber crimes, white-collar crimes, and general crimes; and as a member of the executive team at Stroz Friedberg, a cybersecurity and investigations consulting firm.
Legaltech News recently asked her a series of questions on cyber issues and on her background. The Q&A has been slightly edited for consistency with ALM style.
Legaltech News: How will your background in cybersecurity help you as a U.S. attorney?
Erin Nealy Cox: Before I was appointed U.S. attorney, I opened and managed the Dallas office of Stroz Friedberg, a global forensic investigation firm. As head of that office, and later as the Stroz executive leader in charge of computer intrusion investigations worldwide, I worked on a regular basis with businesses across all sectors of our economy that had been victimized by some form of cyber crime, such as an unauthorized intrusion or damage due to a malware infection.
Working with these businesses over the last 10 years, and working constantly—sometimes around-the-clock—with my colleagues investigating, identifying and remediating the intrusion or damage, I learned a great deal about threat actor groups and nation-states that are the sources of the major cyber threats. As a result, I gained comprehensive knowledge about the techniques and methods these sources use to gain unauthorized access to our networks and computers, and what defensive measures and practices work to frustrate or defeat these threats.
This, coupled with my years as an assistant U.S. attorney prosecuting cyber crimes, provides me with invaluable experience to better fulfill my responsibilities as the U.S. attorney. Cyber crime has become an increasing threat to our nation's national security and our business community. And as U.S. attorney, I am responsible for helping all citizens in the Northern District of Texas—government agencies, businesses, organizations, groups, and individuals—recognize and fight these threats, and prosecute the offenders.
My expertise in cybersecurity will help me identify and communicate the threats to the affected communities so they can understand and craft solutions needed to defend themselves; and it will help me ensure that my prosecutors have the tools, training, and resources to prosecute vigorously those responsible for cyber crimes, wherever they may be located.
Is cybersecurity going to be a priority for your office during your term?
Absolutely. Cyber crime is a present, ever-growing, and persistent threat to our institutions, businesses, and citizens. We live in an increasingly digital world; more and more business is conducted online by our government, commercial, and financial institutions. In addition, more and more of our information, and information about us, is being stored in digital form on our laptops, cellphones, tablets, and “in the cloud.” We can't take advantage of the vast benefits, efficiencies, and conveniences the digital world offers us unless we have confidence that our information and our transactions are secure.
That is why, for example, protection against cyberattacks and high-technology crimes is the FBI's third-highest priority, behind protection from terrorist attacks and protection against foreign espionage. And cybersecurity and protection against cyber crime will be a similarly high priority during my tenure as U.S. attorney.
What are the specific fields of cybersecurity that are priorities? What are particular cyber issues in Texas?
Protecting against cyber-based attacks and cyber crimes is one of the Department of Justice's highest mission priorities. And I intend to fulfill that mission principally through deterrence, by prosecuting the actors who target those businesses and institutions and through outreach and by communicating threats to those businesses, especially sectors of our economy that comprise our critical infrastructure. I am going to work with all the law enforcement agencies in our district to make sure that our collective expertise in cyber and cyber crime is made available to those who are targets or at an increased risk of being targeted, so they know what they must do to protect themselves, and in so doing, protect us all.
What do businesses most need from government regulators when it comes to cybersecurity?
Let me make clear that my office does not have regulatory authority over any type of business or industry. However, I expect to work very closely with government agencies and offices in the Northern District of Texas that do have regulatory authority, such as the SEC regional office in Fort Worth. They have extensive experience and expertise in cybersecurity, and particularly how it affects the entities they regulate. We both have a role to play in enhancing cybersecurity and combating cyber crime.
Since becoming U.S. attorney, I have made an effort to speak with businesses in the Northern District of Texas to find out what they expect and need from my office, and I intend to continue this practice with more business leaders and organizations in this district going forward. Businesses need law enforcement agents and prosecutors who are familiar with the specific cyber threats that businesses face and the increasingly regulated environment in which they function.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Is It Time for Large UK Law Firms to Begin Taking Private Equity Investment?
- 2Federal Judge Pauses Trump Funding Freeze as Democratic AGs Launch Defensive Measure
- 3Class Action Litigator Tapped to Lead Shook, Hardy & Bacon's Houston Office
- 4Arizona Supreme Court Presses Pause on KPMG's Bid to Deliver Legal Services
- 5Bill Would Consolidate Antitrust Enforcement Under DOJ
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250