Erin Nealy Cox: How Cyber Background Helps as US Attorney
Erin Nealy Cox, now the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Texas, comes from a cybersecurity background with McKinsey & Co. and Stroz Friedberg, along with the public sector.
February 08, 2018 at 01:00 PM
5 minute read
In November 2017, Erin Nealy Cox became the U.S. attorney for the Northern District of Texas. Perhaps unique for a U.S. attorney, she has extensive background in cybersecurity, having worked as a senior adviser at McKinsey & Co. in the cybersecurity and risk practice; as an assistant U.S, attorney in the Northern District of Texas, where she prosecuted cyber crimes, white-collar crimes, and general crimes; and as a member of the executive team at Stroz Friedberg, a cybersecurity and investigations consulting firm.
Legaltech News recently asked her a series of questions on cyber issues and on her background. The Q&A has been slightly edited for consistency with ALM style.
Legaltech News: How will your background in cybersecurity help you as a U.S. attorney?
Erin Nealy Cox: Before I was appointed U.S. attorney, I opened and managed the Dallas office of Stroz Friedberg, a global forensic investigation firm. As head of that office, and later as the Stroz executive leader in charge of computer intrusion investigations worldwide, I worked on a regular basis with businesses across all sectors of our economy that had been victimized by some form of cyber crime, such as an unauthorized intrusion or damage due to a malware infection.
Working with these businesses over the last 10 years, and working constantly—sometimes around-the-clock—with my colleagues investigating, identifying and remediating the intrusion or damage, I learned a great deal about threat actor groups and nation-states that are the sources of the major cyber threats. As a result, I gained comprehensive knowledge about the techniques and methods these sources use to gain unauthorized access to our networks and computers, and what defensive measures and practices work to frustrate or defeat these threats.
This, coupled with my years as an assistant U.S. attorney prosecuting cyber crimes, provides me with invaluable experience to better fulfill my responsibilities as the U.S. attorney. Cyber crime has become an increasing threat to our nation's national security and our business community. And as U.S. attorney, I am responsible for helping all citizens in the Northern District of Texas—government agencies, businesses, organizations, groups, and individuals—recognize and fight these threats, and prosecute the offenders.
My expertise in cybersecurity will help me identify and communicate the threats to the affected communities so they can understand and craft solutions needed to defend themselves; and it will help me ensure that my prosecutors have the tools, training, and resources to prosecute vigorously those responsible for cyber crimes, wherever they may be located.
Is cybersecurity going to be a priority for your office during your term?
Absolutely. Cyber crime is a present, ever-growing, and persistent threat to our institutions, businesses, and citizens. We live in an increasingly digital world; more and more business is conducted online by our government, commercial, and financial institutions. In addition, more and more of our information, and information about us, is being stored in digital form on our laptops, cellphones, tablets, and “in the cloud.” We can't take advantage of the vast benefits, efficiencies, and conveniences the digital world offers us unless we have confidence that our information and our transactions are secure.
That is why, for example, protection against cyberattacks and high-technology crimes is the FBI's third-highest priority, behind protection from terrorist attacks and protection against foreign espionage. And cybersecurity and protection against cyber crime will be a similarly high priority during my tenure as U.S. attorney.
What are the specific fields of cybersecurity that are priorities? What are particular cyber issues in Texas?
Protecting against cyber-based attacks and cyber crimes is one of the Department of Justice's highest mission priorities. And I intend to fulfill that mission principally through deterrence, by prosecuting the actors who target those businesses and institutions and through outreach and by communicating threats to those businesses, especially sectors of our economy that comprise our critical infrastructure. I am going to work with all the law enforcement agencies in our district to make sure that our collective expertise in cyber and cyber crime is made available to those who are targets or at an increased risk of being targeted, so they know what they must do to protect themselves, and in so doing, protect us all.
What do businesses most need from government regulators when it comes to cybersecurity?
Let me make clear that my office does not have regulatory authority over any type of business or industry. However, I expect to work very closely with government agencies and offices in the Northern District of Texas that do have regulatory authority, such as the SEC regional office in Fort Worth. They have extensive experience and expertise in cybersecurity, and particularly how it affects the entities they regulate. We both have a role to play in enhancing cybersecurity and combating cyber crime.
Since becoming U.S. attorney, I have made an effort to speak with businesses in the Northern District of Texas to find out what they expect and need from my office, and I intend to continue this practice with more business leaders and organizations in this district going forward. Businesses need law enforcement agents and prosecutors who are familiar with the specific cyber threats that businesses face and the increasingly regulated environment in which they function.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Decision of the Day: Judge Reduces $287M Jury Verdict Against Harley-Davidson in Wrongful Death Suit
- 2Kirkland to Covington: 2024's International Chart Toppers and Award Winners
- 3Decision of the Day: Judge Denies Summary Judgment Motions in Suit by Runner Injured in Brooklyn Bridge Park
- 4KISS, Profit Motive and Foreign Currency Contracts
- 512 Days of … Web Analytics
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250