McCann FitzGerald Launches GDPR Assessment App, Banks on EU Expertise
The tool, developed with Neota Logic, uses artificial intelligence to assess an organization's compliance level with the EU data regulation.
February 12, 2018 at 11:10 AM
3 minute read
|
In anticipation of the European Union's May 2018 implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), technology companies have begun changing their privacy policies and the way they design products. But the seeing an opportunity for compliance technology and services, legal organizations have also started offering products to help clients meet the regulation's strict mandates.
Ireland-based law firm McCann FitzGerald recently launched its GDPR Gap Analysis Application, which acts as an assessment tool for organizations. Built with an AI-engine supplied by Neota Logic as part of a long term development agreement, the app assesses an organization's GDPR compliance level by asking a series of questions. Adam Finlay, partner at McCann FitzGerald, explained that the questions “are all phrased to glean 'yes' or 'no' or multiple choice answers.”
But this is not a simple rules-based question and answer compliance tool. Tom Connor, the firm's investigations technical specialist, noted that the app's Neota engine is “inference ending,” meaning that the system “has a capability of understanding permutations moving forward and permutations in this review mirror, in order to determine what it should provide next to get to a conclusion.”
Essentially then, “as you work through the questions, depending on the answers you give, further questions will pop up with more relevance” to your specific situation, Finlay said. He added that the questions “evolve as you are filling in your responses.”
Once all questions are completed, the app displays an organization's level of compliance with the GDPR through numeric scores around a variety of GDPR mandates. Questions are weighted differently during calculations. After the scores are generated, the app provides a transcript of all the questions and answers, as well as detailed “analysis report” for recommendations on how to improve compliance.
McCann FitzGerald's app is far from the only GDPR assessment app on the market. Law firms Orrick and Hogan Lovells, as well as tech companies like TRUSTe, OneTrust, and PrivacyCheq offer similar assessment tools.
But Finlay believes that such competitor apps “are not as sophisticated in terms of the technology” and scoring as McCann FitzGerald's app. Moreover, he sees these apps as “narrower in focus” and lacking in the level of expertise an Ireland-based law firm can bring to a GDPR compliance tool.
“Some of them don't have the nuance in terms of understanding the regulation and handling the regulation that, in my experience, a European [law firm] brings.”
Karyn Harty, partner at McCann FitzGerald, noted that the development of the app was done in-house through the firm's research and development team, which is made up of members that are both software developers and “people with law degrees” in order to make sure the app was designed as accurately as possible.
Still, despite the level of expertise a firm and its attorneys may have on the GDPR, translating that all of knowledge into an assessment tool can be a near impossible endeavor. Given the complexity and the potential fluidity of the GDPR, for example, there is only so much precision such an app is able to offer. Finlay noted that there is “a grey area to how binding some of [the GDPR] guidance is” and that regulators may change how the regulation will be enforced in the months to come.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Glynn County Judge Rejects Ex-DA's Motion to Halt Her Misconduct Trial in Ahmaud Arbery Investigation
- 2Pa 100: Largest Law Firms
- 3Whistleblowers Are Here To Stay: Counseling Corporate Clients on Whistleblower Programs
- 4Intentionally Caused Motor Vehicle Accidents In the Video Spotlight
- 5Scrap the State's Taxpayer Funding of Elections
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250