McCann FitzGerald Launches GDPR Assessment App, Banks on EU Expertise
The tool, developed with Neota Logic, uses artificial intelligence to assess an organization's compliance level with the EU data regulation.
February 12, 2018 at 11:10 AM
3 minute read
In anticipation of the European Union's May 2018 implementation of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), technology companies have begun changing their privacy policies and the way they design products. But the seeing an opportunity for compliance technology and services, legal organizations have also started offering products to help clients meet the regulation's strict mandates.
Ireland-based law firm McCann FitzGerald recently launched its GDPR Gap Analysis Application, which acts as an assessment tool for organizations. Built with an AI-engine supplied by Neota Logic as part of a long term development agreement, the app assesses an organization's GDPR compliance level by asking a series of questions. Adam Finlay, partner at McCann FitzGerald, explained that the questions “are all phrased to glean 'yes' or 'no' or multiple choice answers.”
But this is not a simple rules-based question and answer compliance tool. Tom Connor, the firm's investigations technical specialist, noted that the app's Neota engine is “inference ending,” meaning that the system “has a capability of understanding permutations moving forward and permutations in this review mirror, in order to determine what it should provide next to get to a conclusion.”
Essentially then, “as you work through the questions, depending on the answers you give, further questions will pop up with more relevance” to your specific situation, Finlay said. He added that the questions “evolve as you are filling in your responses.”
Once all questions are completed, the app displays an organization's level of compliance with the GDPR through numeric scores around a variety of GDPR mandates. Questions are weighted differently during calculations. After the scores are generated, the app provides a transcript of all the questions and answers, as well as detailed “analysis report” for recommendations on how to improve compliance.
McCann FitzGerald's app is far from the only GDPR assessment app on the market. Law firms Orrick and Hogan Lovells, as well as tech companies like TRUSTe, OneTrust, and PrivacyCheq offer similar assessment tools.
But Finlay believes that such competitor apps “are not as sophisticated in terms of the technology” and scoring as McCann FitzGerald's app. Moreover, he sees these apps as “narrower in focus” and lacking in the level of expertise an Ireland-based law firm can bring to a GDPR compliance tool.
“Some of them don't have the nuance in terms of understanding the regulation and handling the regulation that, in my experience, a European [law firm] brings.”
Karyn Harty, partner at McCann FitzGerald, noted that the development of the app was done in-house through the firm's research and development team, which is made up of members that are both software developers and “people with law degrees” in order to make sure the app was designed as accurately as possible.
Still, despite the level of expertise a firm and its attorneys may have on the GDPR, translating that all of knowledge into an assessment tool can be a near impossible endeavor. Given the complexity and the potential fluidity of the GDPR, for example, there is only so much precision such an app is able to offer. Finlay noted that there is “a grey area to how binding some of [the GDPR] guidance is” and that regulators may change how the regulation will be enforced in the months to come.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Democracy in Focus: New York State Court of Appeals Year in Review
- 2In Vape Case, A Debate Over Forum Shopping
- 3SDNY Criminal Division Deputy Chief Returns to Debevoise
- 4Brownstein Adds Former Interior Secretary, Offering 'Strategic Counsel' During New Trump Term
- 5Tragedy on I-95: Florida Lawsuit Against Horizon Freight System Could Set New Precedent in Crash Cases
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250