Anderson Kill's Blockchain Leader on Where Design Meets Law
Anderson Kill's Stephen Palley talks coding, blockchain blunders and overestimating cryptocurrency.
February 14, 2018 at 10:00 AM
5 minute read
Stephen D. Palley, counsel with Anderson Kill, in Washington, D.C.
While many of today's lawyers and law students are looking to prepare for a future where technology will play an ever-important role, there are those already made for this digital era.
Take for example Stephen Palley, of counsel at Anderson Kill. He may have a traditional lawyer background, but like a small number of today's attorneys, he already has the skills and knowledge to naturally fuse technology and the practice of law. A natural tech enthusiast, he was developing software and thinking of how to leverage blockchain technology long before days of e-discovery or artificial intelligence.
Legaltech News caught up with Palley on the heels of his appointment as head of Anderson Kill's Blockchain and Virtual Currency Group to discuss his technology background, what he believes are the biggest issues facing blockchain technology, and why he became interested in blockchain in the first place.
LTN: What's your experience with software design and development?
Palley: When I was a kid, I taught myself how to program on a computer that doesn't really exist anymore. Then I lost track. I went to college, and grad school and law school, and I played around at different points with different computers and programming languages, but never got back to it in the same way until about six years ago when I was trial lawyer. I had a dispute where I knew the case would settle for a particular amount, and the other lawyer knew it too. So I proposed with my opposing counsel that we give our bottom line numbers to a third party, a friend who was a mediator, and if the numbers match within 5 percent, he would disclose that.
And I thought wouldn't it be cool if there was software that did that. So I ended up building a software startup. I was a partner at a regional law firm at the time, and on the side I created a software company. My software startup didn't go anywhere—I didn't know the first thing about digital marketing or software sales, and I was trying to do all of it while practicing law. But I learned to code again. And I wouldn't say I'm the best programmer in the world, but I was OK after a couple of months.
In your opinion, what is the biggest mistake software developers make today?
Failing to realize that, just because they can create something that looks like magic, they don't know everything. There is more to software development than just putting stuff out in the world. You have to think about the [legal and security] consequences.
What got you interested in cryptocurrency and blockchain technology?
I ended up folding my software company in part because I was uncomfortable with security. I became uncomfortable with the notion that I was storing everything on someone else's services—I was using Amazon Web Services and using a centralized database we had access to.
I wondered how I could do this without having a centralized store of data and how I could create an automated payment system. And then I stumbled on to bitcoin and blockchain. That was 2013.
What do you hope to accomplish as head of Blockchain and Virtual Currency Group?
I hope to help builders build, innovators innovate and when people get in trouble, as happens in any business, to help them resolve their dispute in an efficient manner.
What are most challenging operational issues your clients face with blockchain technology?
One is that the technology allows you to do things internationally, across borders, across jurisdictions. So you can have your data stored everywhere in the world, theoretically. Cross-jurisdictional legal compliance is hard, and that's one of the big pictures issues form an operational standpoint
Another big problem is key management. One of the unique things about cryptocurrency in particular is that it is controllable using a private key that is not maintained necessarily by any centralized source. If you have it, you control the assets. So with blockchain, it's not like anyone can drill it open like a safe deposit box, and it's not like a court order [can open it] either.
What are the biggest threats facing blockchain technologies?
Cybersecurity and fraud are problems, but also its poor design and overestimation of what the technology can currently do. Remember, Ethereum is three years old. Bitcoin has only been around since 2009. One the biggest threats is trying to use these things in ways they are not ready to be used.
You can't get angry at a hammer for not being a screwdriver, and I think if people overestimate the ability to run sophisticated production applications on the blockchain, it's going to be problematic.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllInside Travers Smith's AI Training, Development Efforts
Women of Legal Tech: 'People Are the Most Important Part of the Equation' Advises Katherine Lowry
Cleary Sees AI as 'Co-Pilot,' Among Growing Client Eagerness for Legal Tech
5 minute readReed Smith's New Emerging Tech Partner Sees 'Much Overlap' Between AI Regulation, Privacy Laws
Trending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Greenberg Traurig Initiates String of Suits Following JPMorgan Chase's 'Infinite Money Glitch'
- 5Data-Driven Legal Strategies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250