Can Big Data Identify Sexual Harassers in Workplaces?
The company's new behavior analysis taxonomy aims to help companies identify sexual harassment before it amounts to full blown litigation.
February 15, 2018 at 12:30 PM
4 minute read
Advanced Discovery this week launched a sexual harassment taxonomy for its Riskcovery analytics suite that would allow companies to examine existing company data for potential sexual harassment concerns.
David Trachtenberg, chief marketing officer for Advanced Discovery, explained that companies often deal with these issues in litigation, despite having the capacity to screen for them prior to costly and exhaustive litigation. “Before data becomes evidence in litigation in traditional e-discovery practices, it's already sitting there with the company in their data before its highlighted as a potential evidence for litigation,” he noted.
Advanced Discovery's predictive risk assessment tools to date have focused on attempting to identify potential insider trading or compliance concerns. Collin Miller, director of Riskcovery services, noted that the company increasingly received calls from businesses looking to apply some of these same approaches to sexual harassment claims and Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) violations.
Trachtenberg attributed some of this renewed attention to the number of high profile stories of workplace sexual misconduct following from the #MeToo campaign. “At the simplest level, it's a pervasive issue. It's not just coming out of Hollywood, it's coming out of board rooms as well,” Trachtenberg said.
Miller explained that the tool uses algorithms to scan through pre-process data sitting in email servers or mobile devices and look for potential red flags for inappropriate workplace conduct. However, because those red flags are a little more difficult to find than just keyword searching for “sexual harassment,” the Riskcovery team has done a little extra work to segment and identify recurring comments or behaviors that are likely to lead to or corroborate sexual harassment claims.
“That's not necessarily something you can just run keywords for. We're actually running a behavioral analysis,” Miller said.
Using machine learning to predict human behavior has been one of the more controversial uses of artificial intelligence over the last few years. Both scholars and high profile reporting by ProPublica and other media outlets have pointed to the potential for predictive algorithms to reinforce and recode existing bias and stereotypes in data.
Miller said Advanced Discovery takes a fairly “reactionary ingestive” approach to sexual harassment analysis to ensure that analysis is unbiased. The platform takes in any claim information provided about potential harassers, including descriptions of any misconduct or inappropriate behavior, and will use those as samples to examine potential conduct.
More importantly, Miller noted that the tool isn't a set-it-and-forget-it type platform, but rather an investigatory platform. “It goes different ways. Sometimes we end up proving the negative; other times we go in and find exactly what's going on,” he said.
The tool is also easily customized to particular business compliance standards, meaning that companies can calibrate the tool to identify specific behaviors that violate its internal policies.
Given the new spotlight and seriousness with which businesses are now handling sexual harassment allegations, Trachtenberg expects that tools like Riskcovery are likely to see a swift increase in usage.
“I think and I expect that we're going to start seeing a shift from the investigative 'let's go see if there's an issue and prove the positive or negative,' approach to broadly being more proactive on high-risk individuals like higher management,” he said.
“'We didn't know' doesn't pass muster anymore,” Trachtenberg added.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250