Dealing with Disparity: Littler Tries Analytics for Pay Equity
Built by Littler Mendelson's analytics team, the EquityAssessment tool automates number crunching for employers to determine ways to address pay equity.
February 15, 2018 at 11:30 AM
4 minute read
The #MeToo movement has resurfaced interest around pay inequity by both gender and race. For companies looking to address such disparities, Littler Mendelson has released its Pay Equity Assessment Tool.
Built by the firm's analytics team, the tool crunches client data on employee compensation and demographics, like race, gender and state, to analyze for potential litigation risk against both federal and state laws. Using a dashboard that allows for filtering information by different categories, Littler attorneys consult clients to begin “proactively fixing” payment disparities “using tested legal strategies,” a press release noted.
So what are these legal strategies? Denise Visconti, employment attorney and office managing shareholder at Littler, told LTN that they're client dependent, though she noted that some might include “adjustments in pay at the fundamental level,” as well as reviewing a company's compensation strategies.
In measuring compensation differences among different demographics, the Pay Equity Assessment tool identifies differences deemed statistically significant while alerting whether they “reflect legitimate business considerations,” the release noted.
“The laws that are on the books currently … have some very specific requirements and defenses available to employers as to factors that could drive pay,” Visconti said. Among these are seniority, shift differentials, and geography. The tool, she added, evaluates whether employee pay is being driven by such factors, or whether others are at play.
To make information easier to digest, the tool relies on visuals like a color-coded map of the US that can be utilized to break down employment law, pay equity, and potential risk by factors like gender or race. It also allows a user to apply variables like education level, job title and prior work experience. Data can be dissected via a breakdown of the statistics utilized for the charts, and reports can be printed out.
The technology is only available to Littler clients. The firm declined to comment on pricing.
Pay inequity has been an issue in the US for decades and continues to persist. A 2017 American Association of University Women (AAUW) report noted that in 2016, women were paid 80 percent of what men were paid. The report also noted, “At the rate of change between 1960 and 2016, women are expected to reach pay equity with men in 2059,” though that “slow progress has stalled in recent years.”
Speaking at Brown University earlier this month, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor said, “Pay equality is one of the biggest issues our nation faces,” the Associated Press reported. She also noted that pay inequality between women and men has remained largely the same since her own childhood.
Wage gaps by race persist as well. Data compiled by the Economic Policy Institute found that on average, a Hispanic worker was paid about 29 percent less hourly than a white worker. Black workers, on average, were paid nearly 27 percent less hourly than their white counterparts.
Some organizations claim to be taking steps to address such gaps. In January, Citigroup announced an effort to increase pay for minorities and women. A Citigroup blog announcing the effort said that the move supports the company's “efforts to attract and retain the best talent and reward performance consistent with our Leadership Standards.”
When it comes to addressing pay inequity, Aaron Crews, Littler's chief data analytics officer, said, “Generally speaking, most organizations want to do the right thing. And most who are going to go through the process of doing a pay equity assessment are trying to do the right thing in a way that makes business sense.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250