Outside Counsel Selection, Contracts & Outcome Analysis: Analytics' Homes Beyond Discovery
A recent CTRL report found more in-house departments planning to spend on analytics in various areas in the coming year.
February 26, 2018 at 03:04 PM
3 minute read
Analytics has frequently been touted as among the next big technologies in legal technology, and a recent report indicates that the technology is taking hold.
The Coalition of Technology Resources for Lawyers' (CTRL) third annual Analytics Report, which took accounts from a survey of attorneys and legal department professionals, found that analytics is likely to “be considered indispensable” and “will be widespread” among the legal profession over the next 10 years,
Dean Gonsowski, founder and executive director at CTRL, said “70 or so” people were polled, and that all were in-house legal professionals. Respondents were equally taken from small (under 500 employees), midsized (500 to 5,000) and large (over 5,001) organizations.
The report cited e-discovery as the arena in which analytics was most often applied, with 95 percent of practitioners reporting spend will either “grow or stay level” in the coming year. Data culling, ECA and privilege review were the most popular use cases for analytics.
But the technology is moving beyond its usual home in e-discovery. The survey found a 43 percent increase in use of analytics for outcome analysis, which attempts to predict how a judge in a particular district will rule on certain litigation.
“People need to see that [these use cases are] being done, they need to see it in the litigation,” Gonsowski said. “That allows them to open their minds in ways around the possibilities.”
Another area gaining steam in analytics is outside counsel selection. While the usage rate reported in 2018 has stagnated (15 percent among in house counsel), there was a 200 percent increase in organizations reporting that spending for this would increase over the next 12 months.
As to why spend stagnated while a massive spending hike was predicted, Gonsowski said, “With the corporate cycle, you're going to see people that are thinking a year ahead.” He added that “you'll see a lot of folks kick the tires with analytics in a lot of use cases” while building it into the following year's budget.
Among those currently using analytics for outside counsel selection, 77 percent used it for evaluating billing rates, while 88 percent used it for performance.
“Corporate legal is a cost center, and typically not perceived as a value-add,” said Phil Favro, director of legal education and resources at CTRL. Analytics for billing rate and performance, he said, “provides a number of leverages in terms of getting your cost metrics on the right level.”
As to analytics' efficiency for these ends, Favro said it's on “a case by case” basis, though noted that results are useful for litigants who are in court over and over again. “This use is critical to being able to assess where we could economize, and where we could add value instead of being a cost center.”
The report also noted a 146 percent increase in contract analytics from the previous year. The most common applications were “evaluating existing contracts,” which saw a 15 percent increase from 2017, and “evaluation during negotiations,” which increased by 39 percent.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Commission Confirms Three of Newsom's Appellate Court Picks
- 2Judge Grants Special Counsel's Motion, Dismisses Criminal Case Against Trump Without Prejudice
- 3GEICO, Travelers to Pay NY $11.3M for Cybersecurity Breaches
- 4'Professional Misconduct': Maryland Supreme Court Disbars 86-Year-Old Attorney
- 5Capital Markets Partners Expect IPO Resurgence During Trump Administration
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250