Hogan Lovells, 4th Largest US Firm, Moves Into the Cloud
The firm's adoption of NetDocuments makes it one of the biggest firms to adopt a cloud-based document management strategy.
February 27, 2018 at 02:06 PM
4 minute read
Cloud adoption has been a slow-brewing trend in the legal sector over the last few years, but a recent announcement that Hogan Lovells, the fourth-largest firm in the United States based on the National Law Journal's 2017 rankings, has opted to adopt a cloud-based document management system may indicate that legal is moving more definitively into the cloud.
Hogan Lovells recently announced that the firm plans to use cloud-based system NetDocuments as its primary document management system. Prior to the adoption, the firm was using two competing systems, iManage and OpenText, left over from the firm's merger of Washington D.C.-based Hogan & Hartson and U.K. firm Lovells in 2010.
Hogan Lovells deputy global chief information officer Gareth Ash explained the firm's cloud-based adoption was somewhat incidental to its decision.
“We did not decide to look for a cloud-based solution, rather a solution that would meet the needs of our business and the requirements of our lawyers, such as functionality, security and technical architecture,” Ash told Legaltech News. “The answer just happened to be cloud-based.”
Law firms have long floated concerns about data security around cloud systems. The 2016 Cloud Security Spotlight Report found that 53 percent of respondents were concerned about the security of their data, despite only 9 percent reporting actual cloud-based data security incidents. These concerns, coupled with the additive stresses firms are under to scale up their cybersecurity efforts and protect client data, have made it somewhat tricky for firms to take on large-scale cloud infrastructure adoptions.
Over the last few years, public education and information about cloud systems has changed those opinions dramatically, especially for larger firms. The International Legal Technology Association's 2017 Tech Survey found that 77 percent of firms with more than 700 attorneys planned to increase their cloud infrastructure in the next year.
To date, however, cloud adoption is more a general posture than a regular practice. The ILTA's 2017 Tech Survey also found that only 14 percent of firms use cloud-based document management.
Ash noted that data security was a “significant component” of the firm's decision to move to a cloud-based provider, as was the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) set to go into effect in May.
“GDPR was certainly a factor in our assessment. The project is also not due to go live for some time after GDPR comes into effect, so we will also have time to see the implications of GDPR and make adjustments to our configuration and processes accordingly,” Ash said.
For a firm the size of Hogan Lovells, moving into the cloud isn't just a simple matter of exporting data from one document manager and importing into another. The firm has to get the system up and running for over 7,000 different employees across 49 global offices.
“We are in the very early stages of the project, and the rollout will be a key work-stream where we will inevitably trial different approaches in collaboration with our attorneys and users,” Ash said of the firm's strategy for adoption.
Generally speaking, the firm sees NetDocuments, like any operational technology, less as an experiment in innovation and more as a functional tool. “We started with our requirements and what solution could satisfy them. The NetDocuments architecture allows us to meet those requirements,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250