Hogan Lovells, 4th Largest US Firm, Moves Into the Cloud
The firm's adoption of NetDocuments makes it one of the biggest firms to adopt a cloud-based document management strategy.
February 27, 2018 at 02:06 PM
4 minute read
Hogan Lovells offices at 555 13th Street, NW in Washington, D.C. Oct. 25, 2016. |
Cloud adoption has been a slow-brewing trend in the legal sector over the last few years, but a recent announcement that Hogan Lovells, the fourth-largest firm in the United States based on the National Law Journal's 2017 rankings, has opted to adopt a cloud-based document management system may indicate that legal is moving more definitively into the cloud.
Hogan Lovells recently announced that the firm plans to use cloud-based system NetDocuments as its primary document management system. Prior to the adoption, the firm was using two competing systems, iManage and OpenText, left over from the firm's merger of Washington D.C.-based Hogan & Hartson and U.K. firm Lovells in 2010.
Hogan Lovells deputy global chief information officer Gareth Ash explained the firm's cloud-based adoption was somewhat incidental to its decision.
“We did not decide to look for a cloud-based solution, rather a solution that would meet the needs of our business and the requirements of our lawyers, such as functionality, security and technical architecture,” Ash told Legaltech News. “The answer just happened to be cloud-based.”
Law firms have long floated concerns about data security around cloud systems. The 2016 Cloud Security Spotlight Report found that 53 percent of respondents were concerned about the security of their data, despite only 9 percent reporting actual cloud-based data security incidents. These concerns, coupled with the additive stresses firms are under to scale up their cybersecurity efforts and protect client data, have made it somewhat tricky for firms to take on large-scale cloud infrastructure adoptions.
Over the last few years, public education and information about cloud systems has changed those opinions dramatically, especially for larger firms. The International Legal Technology Association's 2017 Tech Survey found that 77 percent of firms with more than 700 attorneys planned to increase their cloud infrastructure in the next year.
To date, however, cloud adoption is more a general posture than a regular practice. The ILTA's 2017 Tech Survey also found that only 14 percent of firms use cloud-based document management.
Ash noted that data security was a “significant component” of the firm's decision to move to a cloud-based provider, as was the European Union's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) set to go into effect in May.
“GDPR was certainly a factor in our assessment. The project is also not due to go live for some time after GDPR comes into effect, so we will also have time to see the implications of GDPR and make adjustments to our configuration and processes accordingly,” Ash said.
For a firm the size of Hogan Lovells, moving into the cloud isn't just a simple matter of exporting data from one document manager and importing into another. The firm has to get the system up and running for over 7,000 different employees across 49 global offices.
“We are in the very early stages of the project, and the rollout will be a key work-stream where we will inevitably trial different approaches in collaboration with our attorneys and users,” Ash said of the firm's strategy for adoption.
Generally speaking, the firm sees NetDocuments, like any operational technology, less as an experiment in innovation and more as a functional tool. “We started with our requirements and what solution could satisfy them. The NetDocuments architecture allows us to meet those requirements,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250