OneTrust Releases GDPR Consent Management Platform for Marketers
OneTrust's GDPR solution streamlines the requirements to track, validate and store consent actions under the upcoming EU regulation.
March 08, 2018 at 10:00 AM
3 minute read
|
In advance of the May 25 implementation of the EU's General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), OneTrust has released a consent management platform to help marketers comply with the regulation's strict rules on user consent.
Under the GDPR, consent is one of the six lawful bases companies have for storing and processing personal data of EU citizens.
Lisa Loftis, a principal consultant, customer intelligence, at software company SAS, previously explained to Legaltech News that to be considered valid, consent under the GDPR “has to be freely given, be specific, informed, and unambiguous, and require a clear and affirmative action.”
With the Universal Consent and Preference Management Platform, OneTrust hopes to streamline the process of collecting and validating consent through offering the ability to track, store, and change consent actions.
OneTrust CEO Kabir Barday explained that the platform is “essentially a software solution that allows a company to maintain a central database of all the consent and user preferences that they have collected from their various customers and employees.”
“It then gives those customers and employees a portal to modify their preferences, opt out, request the deletion of their data, request the access of their data and give the organization the ability to granularly track all of these things,” he said.
OneTrust's platform can connect with the various systems a company uses to collect consent by integrating with web-based portals and mobile applications, or allow users to import consent documents or data directly.
Should marketers or their companies be called upon to validate each consent action—a possibility given that the GDPR places the burden of proof on the data processor—the platform also stores what it calls “consent receipts.” Such receipts document “what that user was told at the time of consent, what they consented to, what time it happened, what the page looked like visually,” and other factors that help prove the validity of the consent, Barday said.
The Universal Consent and Preference Management is the latest of several GDPR solutions OneTrust has released in advance of the regulation. But it is also yet another GDPR-focused platform in an increasingly crowded market.
In addition to GDPR compliance and assessment tools offered by TRUSTe and PrivacyCheq, OneTrust also faces competition from GDPR apps created by law firms like Orrick, Hogan Lovells, and McCann FitzGerald. Barday, however, believes OneTrust stands out in its ability to provide an audited trail of consent actions and its ability to integrate across a wide range of data sources which collect consent.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250