Translating In-House Operations to Legal Tech Success: A Q&A With Brian McGovern
The former SVP of legal operations at AIG is moving to an executive role at Mitratech—and looking to battle traditional matter management.
March 08, 2018 at 12:28 PM
5 minute read
Legal operations are growing in importance for many Fortune 500 companies. But for an insurance and finance giant like American International Group Inc., (AIG), where the legal department is baked into the very fabric of client offerings, legal operations isn't just nice to have—it's a crucial facet of company health.
Brian McGovern thrives in such an environment. Most recently holding the title of AIG's senior vice president, chief data officer, legal operations, McGovern was responsible for modernizing and streamlining a department that registered more than $2.4 billion in annual legal spend and utilized more than 1,500 law firms in 90 countries. And it doesn't stop there—McGovern worked in executive-level positions with Merrill Lynch, General Electric and Credit Suisse.
So naturally, McGovern's next career step is … a legal technology company? Indeed. As the newly minted executive director of strategic programs for legal software company Mitratech, McGovern believes he has found a home to continue driving change. Legaltech News recently spoke with McGovern about his background with his new employer, the future of legal operations, and more.
Legaltech News: Simply put, what brought you away from the in-house world to Mitratech?
Brian McGovern: We accomplished quite a lot within AIG's legal operations during my tenure, and Mitratech's TeamConnect enterprise legal management platform was the foundation for our success. TeamConnect enabled us to transform AIG's legal operations department, and with the application of great technology and sound processes, we reduced legal spend by over $1.2 billion.
The AIG implementation of TeamConnect was the largest in the world—and it was delivered on time and on budget. It is because of this journey that I am excited about the opportunity to join forces with Mitratech. I am in the unique position to use my experience to drive value for Mitratech's current and future clients.
The title “executive director of strategic programs” isn't one I see too often. What do you see your day-to-day role being at the company?
My first responsibility is working with Mitratech clients to help them drive value and increase productivity using TeamConnect. This may include advising on implementations, rationalizing international processes, planning for upgrades, creating high-impact analytics and forming a vision for how to innovate within their legal departments. I am also working with the talented Mitratech product development teams to refine the product roadmap and execution to focus on delivering differentiating technology to our customers.
What skills that you developed while in-house do you believe will most help you in your new position?
I have had the great fortune of an interesting career with many years' experience delivering change through process implementation and improvement, and driving positive outcomes using analytics and technology in a variety of sectors. These areas included everything from insurance, investment banking, private banking, operations, data centers, procurement, human resources, broadcast TV and even batteries. My prior role taught me a tremendous amount about how to apply my skills in the legal operations space. There is tremendous opportunity to drive amazing value when you have the right combination of people, process and technology to support your goals. Mitratech's products allow companies to do just that.
The rise of in-house legal operations is something we've been seeing over the last several years. Looking generally, do you see widespread change happening within in-house departments with legal operations? And what needs to happen to spur even more change/adoption?
I believe it starts with changing the perception, or perhaps, even the definition of what makes a legal department world-class. I was proud to lead a large and successful legal operations group and it is great to see other legal departments delivering so much value for so many companies. While there has been widespread adoption and the development of people skills, processes and technology, there is still much more to be done.
New roles and responsibilities are increasingly required of legal teams. More and more they encompass risk and compliance areas within their groups, and legal teams are expected to be strategic drivers for the organization. This means they now have to look beyond traditional matter management and spend management focus. Legal departments are also being asked to innovate and look for ways to connect people and processes, allowing the organization to make better business decisions and improve results. In order to bring about more change within in-house legal departments, they need to break down the silos within their department and across the organization. This is where process improvement and the implementation of the right technology is of paramount importance.
From your experience, what are some common legal pain points that departments still struggle with, but technology can help overcome?
Cross-functional alignment and change management. One of the most commonly perceived pain points by legal teams is the implementation of new technology and new processes. However, what many teams don't realize is that the traditionally fragmented way they currently operate is really where the pain is coming from. As much as user adoption is a challenge for many companies, once they understand that technology like TeamConnect exists to streamline operations and integrate legal functions, they will embrace the technology available to benefit the organization as a whole.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllBARBRI Acquires Skillburst, Growing Its Digital Training Resources for Lawyers
The Perfect Storm: Why Contract Hiring In Privacy Will Eclipse Direct Hiring
15 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
- 4Meet the Lawyers on Kamala Harris' Transition Team
- 5Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250