University-Developed Polisis App Tackles Cumbersome Privacy Policies
For both consumers and corporate users such as attorneys, Polisis shows users which data are being collected, for what reasons, and what options the user has for controlling data collection.
March 12, 2018 at 11:57 AM
4 minute read
It is now easier to search through often-cumbersome corporate privacy policies thanks to natural language processing techniques applied by university researchers.
Professors at the University of Wisconsin, the University of Michigan and the Federal Institute of Technology at Lausanne, Switzerland, have announced their new artificial intelligence-guided app. It is called Polisis, which is an abbreviation for “privacy policy analysis.”
How does it work? “Polisis is a framework that allows for automated analysis of the privacy policies,” Kassem Fawaz, an assistant professor of engineering at the University of Wisconsin, told Legaltech News.
“In particular, it visualizes the different aspects of the policies as well as the data flows,” he explained.
For example, Polisis shows users which data are being collected, for what reasons, and what options the user has for controlling data collection. For third parties, it shows the type of information shared, the reasons for sharing, and the options users have to control the sharing.
Fawaz said, “It employs novel natural language processing techniques to automatically understand the content of privacy policies.”
Above all, it makes it easier to understand privacy policies, which Fawaz called “our ultimate objective.” He added, “In 2008, a study [by] McDonald and Cranor estimated that it would take the average user 201 hours to read all the privacy policies encountered in a year. Now, with the rise of Internet of Things and mobile systems, the user is more likely to spend more time to read the policy of each website, service, app and device with which they interact. The users simply cannot cope with the depth and breadth of privacy policies.
“By providing more intuitive interfaces that extract the relevant information from the policy, we can reduce the gap between users and the language of the privacy policies,” Fawaz said.
The tool helps users make decisions about privacy when interacting with online services. Surveys have found users care about privacy, and they “need usable privacy-enhancing tools for them to take actions. In our research, we aim to provide users with the tools that help them understand how their information is being collected and managed,” Fawaz said.
It can also benefit other stakeholders, including lawyers. Kang G. Shin, a professor at the University of Michigan and founding director of the Real-Time Computing Laboratory, added in an interview, “Polisis can help lawyers understand the underlying privacy policies quickly and easily, and also explain them to their clients with natural language without relying on legal jargon.”
The app can benefit consumers, too, by giving them a better interface so they can understand the privacy policies. “Instead of parsing pages of unclear text, consumers can view more intuitive visualizations to understand how their data is being collected, processed, managed, and shared,” Fawaz said.
“As a result, they will sign off things with good and correct understanding of the substance in the lengthy, fuzzified policy documents/statements,” Shin further explained. “As is, most consumers sign off [on] things without knowing/understanding the privacy implications in those documents.”
Fawaz also confirmed that Polisis does not restrict companies or businesses: “It only requires companies to provide a privacy policy, which they already do. Polisis automatically fetches the privacy policy from the company's website and processes it.”
A research prototype is available at pribot.org/polisis, and a research prototype for a chatbot that answers consumers questions about privacy policies is at pribot.org/bot.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250