University-Developed Polisis App Tackles Cumbersome Privacy Policies
For both consumers and corporate users such as attorneys, Polisis shows users which data are being collected, for what reasons, and what options the user has for controlling data collection.
March 12, 2018 at 11:57 AM
4 minute read
It is now easier to search through often-cumbersome corporate privacy policies thanks to natural language processing techniques applied by university researchers.
Professors at the University of Wisconsin, the University of Michigan and the Federal Institute of Technology at Lausanne, Switzerland, have announced their new artificial intelligence-guided app. It is called Polisis, which is an abbreviation for “privacy policy analysis.”
How does it work? “Polisis is a framework that allows for automated analysis of the privacy policies,” Kassem Fawaz, an assistant professor of engineering at the University of Wisconsin, told Legaltech News.
“In particular, it visualizes the different aspects of the policies as well as the data flows,” he explained.
For example, Polisis shows users which data are being collected, for what reasons, and what options the user has for controlling data collection. For third parties, it shows the type of information shared, the reasons for sharing, and the options users have to control the sharing.
Fawaz said, “It employs novel natural language processing techniques to automatically understand the content of privacy policies.”
Above all, it makes it easier to understand privacy policies, which Fawaz called “our ultimate objective.” He added, “In 2008, a study [by] McDonald and Cranor estimated that it would take the average user 201 hours to read all the privacy policies encountered in a year. Now, with the rise of Internet of Things and mobile systems, the user is more likely to spend more time to read the policy of each website, service, app and device with which they interact. The users simply cannot cope with the depth and breadth of privacy policies.
“By providing more intuitive interfaces that extract the relevant information from the policy, we can reduce the gap between users and the language of the privacy policies,” Fawaz said.
The tool helps users make decisions about privacy when interacting with online services. Surveys have found users care about privacy, and they “need usable privacy-enhancing tools for them to take actions. In our research, we aim to provide users with the tools that help them understand how their information is being collected and managed,” Fawaz said.
It can also benefit other stakeholders, including lawyers. Kang G. Shin, a professor at the University of Michigan and founding director of the Real-Time Computing Laboratory, added in an interview, “Polisis can help lawyers understand the underlying privacy policies quickly and easily, and also explain them to their clients with natural language without relying on legal jargon.”
The app can benefit consumers, too, by giving them a better interface so they can understand the privacy policies. “Instead of parsing pages of unclear text, consumers can view more intuitive visualizations to understand how their data is being collected, processed, managed, and shared,” Fawaz said.
“As a result, they will sign off things with good and correct understanding of the substance in the lengthy, fuzzified policy documents/statements,” Shin further explained. “As is, most consumers sign off [on] things without knowing/understanding the privacy implications in those documents.”
Fawaz also confirmed that Polisis does not restrict companies or businesses: “It only requires companies to provide a privacy policy, which they already do. Polisis automatically fetches the privacy policy from the company's website and processes it.”
A research prototype is available at pribot.org/polisis, and a research prototype for a chatbot that answers consumers questions about privacy policies is at pribot.org/bot.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250