Allen Matkins Brings Marketing Background to New CIO Role
Adam Stock is hoping to bring technology into the core of Allen Matkins' operations, just as he did as chief marketing officer.
March 13, 2018 at 11:10 AM
5 minute read
Law firm innovation officers seem to come from all kinds of backgrounds, from the more technical side all the way to the business end. In recent years, though, marketing is another area that has become a much more technical, data-driven practice across industries, and it's driven law firms to adopt new software and technology to innovate their own strategies.
Enter Adam Stock, formerly the chief marketing officer and now chief innovation officer for Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis. Stock's marketing background, while perhaps unexpected for a role increasingly concerned with cybersecurity and artificial intelligence, has given him broad experience in implementing new, technology-based strategies across the firm, as well as a strong sense of how to communicate value back to clients.
Legaltech News recently caught up with Stock to ask a few questions.
LTN: How did you find your way into legal marketing?
Adam Stock: I worked for several software companies as the head of product management and marketing. In those roles, I worked extensively with our in-house and outside counsel on contracts, intellectual property, etc. When law firms started hiring business people in the early 2000s, I joined an Am Law 100 law firm [Dorsey & Whitney] as their first director of sales as part of their marketing and business development department. I became the chief business development and marketing officer of Dorsey, and later joined Allen Matkins as their head of marketing and client service.
How do you think your marketing background will inform your work as firm CIO?
Over the last 10 years, marketing has become very technical. The Allen Matkins marketing team has been in the forefront of using marketing technology tools to improve the firm's visibility and client development. In addition, I founded and ran the LMA Legal Marketing Technology Conference for more than five years. The conference has been the focus and center of the use of technology in law firm marketing, client development and client service. I was privileged to work with the law firm marketers and technology partners who are a part of that community.
The marketing and business development departments of large law firms are uniquely positioned to understand and address the client life cycle at their firms. The challenge for law firms is to communicate the value they provide to their clients.
What specific things do you plan to draw from your marketing experience into your current position?
A law firm marketer and business developer cannot succeed without working well with attorneys and getting them to try new techniques. This position is measured by successful outcomes. The same is true for the digital transformations that law firms are undertaking. The adoption of new technologies and new ways of doing things by the firm and its attorneys is at the center of this job.
Are there any challenges you expect to deal with in making this transition?
The challenges that I face are the same as any CIO: driving innovation within the law firm. Law firm IT departments are excellent at maintaining a stable, secure and productive environment for their firms. They are less successful at driving innovation projects in a quick, agile and cost-effective manner to transform the way that their firms do business.
What are some of your initial priorities for your work in the next couple years?
Our primary priorities are to de-silo law firm information so law firms can make better decisions, to apply new technologies to bring efficiency and value to clients, and to transform law firm processes so that law firms can become more innovative.
The CIO position is still a relatively new one in the law firm space. How do you imagine that position will evolve in the next couple years?
The CIO position recognizes that the IT department is not just a provider of technology, but a provider of information solutions. Since law firms are information services, the position recognizes that information and technology excellence is strategic to the firm.
Law firms overall get a really bad rap for being slow to innovate and slow to adopt. How do you hope your work can or will change that?
While law firms have been slow to innovate, they have always been excellent at listening to their clients. Our clients and their legal operations departments are now asking for things that innovators inside law firms have been trying to push for a while. Clients help push law firms to be better at innovation.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Gunderson Dettmer Opens Atlanta Office With 3 Partners From Morris Manning
- 2Decision of the Day: Court Holds Accident with Post Driver Was 'Bizarre Occurrence,' Dismisses Action Brought Under Labor Law §240
- 3Judge Recommends Disbarment for Attorney Who Plotted to Hack Judge's Email, Phone
- 4Two Wilkinson Stekloff Associates Among Victims of DC Plane Crash
- 5Two More Victims Alleged in New Sean Combs Sex Trafficking Indictment
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250