Murphy & McGonigle Launches App for Clients Facing 'Surprise Investigations'
With 'M&M Defend,' Murphy & McGonigle aids clients unexpectedly served with search warrants, subpoenas, or interviews.
March 14, 2018 at 11:50 AM
4 minute read
Joining the ranks of law firms entering the app space, financial services law firm Murphy & McGonigle has announced the release of its “M&M Defend” app for clients who face the prospect of surprise investigations.
Acting as a type of quick guide, the app contains advice and instructions for those unexpectedly served with subpoenas, search warrants or interviews. The app has landing page with five buttons, three of which take a user to guides on how to handle either a surprise interview, a search warrant, or a grand jury subpoena. Each guide is written in bullet points and reads as successive instructions.
The two other buttons take a user to an introduction section that explains why the app is needed, or a section that has the contact information of Murphy & McGonigle attorneys who can help with clients facing surprise legal action.
Steven Feldman, an attorney at Murphy & McGonigle who directed the development of the app, noted that the tool is not web-based and can be used as an easily accessible offline guide.
Feldman added that having such information at one's fingertips is vital for “people who often don't have the first idea of what their rights are” and can mean “the difference between people going to jail and getting prosecuted or getting their life back.”
Murphy & McGonigle is offering the app free of charge to any iPhone or Android user, though it is likely to be downloaded primarily by those who already know or work with the firm.
Working in the financial services and regulatory sector, with clients from banks, hedge funds, and the financial tech industry, the firm has its fair share of clients that may be under threat of potential investigations,
“Hedge fund individuals, for example, were in the crosshairs for a while on the issue of insider trading,” Feldman said. “How [officials] were carrying out those insider trading investigations were coming to people's houses for surprise interviews, and they were conducting search warrants at their offices.”
While a straight-forward tool with a simple interface, the M&M Defend App wasn't built “particularly quickly,” Feldman noted. Relying on the firm's in-house computer programmer, the law firm first released a prototype web-based version to elicit user feedback on its design and functionality. From there, they released the app through the Apple Store and Google Play.
But getting the app, which is now in version 2.0, up to par required more than just building out the code. “The content was extremely important, and we shared the content internally with all the different folks who would have an interest in it,” Feldman said.
Murphy & McGonigle relied on some of its own lawyers who were former SEC attorneys, including a number in the trading and markets section of the SEC, to help write the content, he added.
The app isn't the only tech project developed by Murphy & McGonigle. The firm has also launched databases that track mortgage-backed securities litigation in the U.S. What's more, the firm recently launched the Blockchain Law Center, a website that posts the up-to-date developments in the blockchain space and hosts a resource center and articles written by Murphy & McGonigle lawyers.
The “M&M Defend App” is also far from the only such tool in the legal market. Just last year Baker McKenzie released its “Antitrust Dawn Raid app,” which acts as a similar guide for those under the prospect of surprise investigations.
Other law firm-created apps have been recently released for other areas of legal advice and services. Reed Smith, for instance, developed RespondeRS, an app designed to help in-house legal professionals determine what data breach notification laws apply should they suffer a cybersecurity incident. Weil, Gotshal & Manges also launched an alumni networking app to connect its present and past attorneys. Similarly, Locke Lord added to its app products by releasing a “Brexit News” app to keep its clients informed on the latest Brexit developments.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1GC Pleads Guilty to Embezzling $7.4 Million From 3 Banks
- 2Authenticating Electronic Signatures
- 3'Fulfilled Her Purpose on the Court': Presiding Judge M. Yvette Miller Is 'Ready for a New Challenge'
- 4Litigation Leaders: Greenspoon Marder’s Beth-Ann Krimsky on What Makes Her Team ‘Prepared, Compassionate and Wicked Smart’
- 5A Look Back at High-Profile Hires in Big Law From Federal Government
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250