Blockchain Education Heads to Canadian Capital
A new blockchain lab at the University of Ottawa's Centre for Law, Technology and Society is working on mapping Canadian law governing cyptocurrencies.
March 21, 2018 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
|
A new blockchain-focused lab at the University of Ottawa's Centre for Law, Technology and Society is the latest in a string of new academic efforts to incorporate blockchain into law school curriculum. The University of Ottawa's lab joins schools such as Cardozo Law, Duke and Vanderbilt, among others, currently providing curricular content for law students around blockchain technology and cryptocurrency.
University of Ottawa professor of law Florian Martin-Bariteau said the lab evolved out of a spike in student interest that started about a year and a half ago. Initially, students were interested in looking at how Canadian law specifically handled blockchain-based cryptocurrencies. “Since the summer, we have focused on cryptocurrencies under Canadian law because it's in the headlines everyday,” he noted.
Currently, Martin-Bariteau is working with students on a project to map Canadian law that could apply to the use and valuation of cryptocurrencies. Between “anti-money laundering, securities, tax law, there are a lot of issues,” Martin-Bariteau said. A separate line of research at the lab is currently looking at potential applications of smart contracts and blockchain-enabled technology within the practice of law.
Canada's law programs have taken up technology in other means as well. The Toronto-Waterloo corridor in particular is known among both attorneys and technologists for its wealth of resources around artificial intelligence and machine learning. The area is also home to ROSS Intelligence, one of the first companies to market an artificial intelligence-based legal research software.
Martin-Bariteau noted that Canada has taken a slightly more measured approach to regulating cryptocurrencies than its counterparts in the U.S. and elsewhere, in part because of the country's use of broader frameworks around what constitutes securities, for example. “I think it's the best way to write statutes, in the way that they can auto-adapt to society and be able to answer societies new issues, new questions. Not to be just a reaction to something that happens,” he said.
This broader framework learning is something that Martin-Bariteau hopes to impart on students working in the blockchain lab. “I want to create a space to reflect,” Martin-Bariteau said of the lab. “It's a very good way to learn to become lawyers and ask the right questions and research a case. Some of my best students, they're still trained to craft what the law is, but at the same time, it's like not everything is written in the case law,” he said.
For now, however, the technical elements of cryptocurrency and blockchain programming remain in the realm of engineers. “We're not coding yet, at least not in blockchain stuff,” said Martin-Bariteau, adding stress to “yet.” He's currently negotiating with the College of Engineering at the University of Ottawa to develop potential collaborations between law and engineering students to employ blockchain technology for an access to justice-focused project. “If we find a way to leverage those kinds of technologies for access to justice, maybe we could try to build something and put it in practice and see how it works,” he said.
For the time being Martin-Bariteau remains committed to mapping relevant law around blockchain in Canada, but he hopes to parlay some of this work into legislative action, especially given that the work is based in Canada's capital city. “When we finish that report with all the issues and propositions to maybe update Canadian law, we will try to meet with people on the hill to try and unpack and propose new regulations. We did that lately for the [Digital] Privacy Act in Canada. I want to continue to do that policymaking work,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250