5 New Legal Tech Companies Y-Combinator Thinks You Should Know About
These five companies came out of Y-Combinator's winter fellows class and pitched their products at the incubator's recent 'Demo Day' exhibition.
March 23, 2018 at 12:01 PM
4 minute read
If the winter class of technology incubator Y-Combinator fellows this year is any indication, Silicon Valley may be softening its historically cold stance towards legal technology. Five different legal-specific companies presented their pitches this week at “Demo Day,” the culminating event for the incubator's mentorship programming.
Y-Combinator has worked with legal-facing companies before, but legal tech still makes up a markedly small percentage of the over 1,500 companies backed by the incubator. Participating companies receive seed grants and mentorship in exchange for 7 percent company equity.
Here's a look at this year's legal tech Y-Combinator fellows:
Lawyaw is a tool that allows attorneys to build templates from their existing documents and manages workflows using machine learning processes. The platform uses natural language processing to sift through document formatting, and also includes both collaboration and e-signature tools.
Lawyaw is headed by former attorney Tucker Cottingham, and it was recently voted into the ABA TECHSHOW's “Startup Alley.”
Callisto is a new take on sexual misconduct reporting software. The platform asks users to provide key identifying information of attackers. If the platform finds that more than one person has identified the same attacker, it then offers to connect users to an “option counselor,” an attorney who can help sexual assault victims navigate their options.
A spokesperson for Callisto explained the company's approach, saying, “By linking victims of sexual harassment with an options counselor, we hope to empower them to make the choice that is right for them, whether that means taking legal action or going to the authorities—among the other routes available—and restoring their humanity in the process.”
Cognition IP is a self-described “venture-backed patent IP firm.” The company promises to file patents in half the time of a standard law firm, using some combination of automation and algorithmic technology, and utilizing fixed fees for patent work. Part of Cognition IP's strategy for cutting time is to use algorithms to generate a kind of “topic graph” around a patent topic to get a sense as to whether previous patent filings would cover that technology.
Co-founder Bryant Lee said the idea for Cognition IP spun out of the software he developed for his own legal work. “People kept asking me, why don't you take my case? I was getting a lot of demand for patent services. I realized that I should just try to make that firm more efficient with my own technology. I realized that's where a lot of demand was and I wanted to build this tech to help with that,” Lee told TechCrunch.
Atrium LTS launched last year as a technology start-up partner of a law firm of the same name, offering a packaged legal service that includes both technology and legal product and advising. Co-founder Justin Kan pitched the service at Demo Day, noting that Atrium's technology services aim to “turn legal documents into data,” according to TechCrunch.
Atrium co-founder and director Bebe Chueh noted that participating in Y-Combinator offered Atrium an opportunity to collaborate with a whole team of other entrepreneurs, a useful additive when your firm primarily services other startups. “When we embedded into Y-Combinator, it allowed us to really hone in on the product and user test with our batchmates,” she said. Chueh added that the Atrium team demoed a product that helped other Y-Combinator participants close fee financing.
Promise aims to be an alternative to bail practices that keep low-income, low-risk people detained behind bars. The platform monitors those released by providing a specifically tailored care plan, reminding users of important court hearings, and helping them to keep track of important probationary obligations like drug testing and substance abuse treatment.
The platform has already garnered $3 million in investments a round led by First Round Capital with participation from Jay-Z's entertainment company Roc Nation, 8VC and Kapor Capital.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Hit by Mail Truck: Man Agrees to $1.85M Settlement for Spinal Injuries
- 2Anticipating a New Era of 'Extreme Vetting,' Big Law Immigration Attys Prep for Demand Surge
- 3Deal Watch: What Dealmakers Are Thankful for in 2024
- 4'The Court Will Take Action': Judge Upbraids Combative Rudy Giuliani During Outburst at Hearing
- 5Attorney Sanctioned for Not Exercising Ordinary Care: This Week in Scott Mollen’s Realty Law Digest
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250