CloudNine Acquires LexisNexis E-Discovery Suite, Including Concordance
The acquisition, aimed at bolstering CloudNine's on-premise portfolio, includes the LAW PreDiscovery, Early Discovery Analyzer (EDA) and Concordance products.
March 26, 2018 at 03:56 PM
3 minute read
Recent trends have seen e-discovery companies expanding to the cloud, particularly through M&A activity. But this time, there a twist: a cloud-based e-discovery expanded its capabilities on-premise through acquiring one of the longest-running e-discovery tools on the market.
On March 26, cloud-based e-discovery automation company CloudNine announced it was acquiring the LexisNexis eDiscovery product suite. This includes the LAW PreDiscovery, Early Discovery Analyzer (EDA) and Concordance products. That final one is particularly notable—23.5 percent of respondents to the 2017 LTN Law Firm Tech Survey indicated using the tool for e-discovery.
In addition, CloudNine announced an investment from an affiliate of Peak Rock Capital, through whom it likely received the ability to make the deal. No monetary details to the acquisition have been announced at the time of this writing.
Brad Jenkins, CEO of CloudNine, specifically pointed to the LexisNexis suite's long-standing implementation as an on-premise software offering as a reason for the purchase in a release announcing the move. He explained, “The ability to offer a hybrid of both on-premise and off-premise software coupled with our automated software allows us to support customer needs regardless of their e-discovery task, security, and cost requirements. As a user of many of the purchased product line offerings for more than a decade, we understand their utility and potential. CloudNine plans to invest heavily in improving the support and development for these offerings and we look forward to integrating them into our product portfolio.”
In an FAQ on CloudNine's website, the company added that it plans to allow access to all of the tools in its portfolio to pre-existing users of the LexisNexis and the CloudNine software. For current LexisNexis e-discovery customers, it explained that it will not be looking to fold these products into the cloud—on the contrary, the company noted in the release that it “plans to invest significant resources in the support, development, enhancement, and availability of LAW Pre-Discovery, Concordance, and EDA offerings by offering them as solutions available as part of the CloudNine portfolio of offerings. These offerings will provide the on-premise solutions that will extend the data and legal discovery capability of CloudNine beyond the cloud.”
The company did say that over time, it plans enhance its “combined portfolio of on-premise and off-premise offerings” through “the technical integration and automation of emerging technologies including artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies such as predictive coding in support of Technology Assisted Review (TAR).”
CloudNine added that current pricing schedules and contractual agreements will remain in effect, though over time, the company “plans to offer favorable terms including access to off-premise offerings for current on-premise customers.”
The company's release also did not explicitly state plans for current LexisNexis e-discovery employees, but the FAQ does note that company contacts will remain the same for now. “Current procedures for all business and support requests will remain in effect until customers are notified by their account managers of changes in procedures or contact,” CloudNine said. “Initial plans are for the on-premise team to operate just as they have during their tenure with the LexisNexis e-discovery organization. Over time customers can expect a controlled migration of systems and contacts into a consolidated business and support organization. However, all changes will be proactively communicated to customers to ensure business and executional continuity.”
Legaltech News has reached out to CloudNine for comment and will update as more is known.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250