CloudNine Acquires LexisNexis E-Discovery Suite, Including Concordance
The acquisition, aimed at bolstering CloudNine's on-premise portfolio, includes the LAW PreDiscovery, Early Discovery Analyzer (EDA) and Concordance products.
March 26, 2018 at 03:56 PM
3 minute read
Recent trends have seen e-discovery companies expanding to the cloud, particularly through M&A activity. But this time, there a twist: a cloud-based e-discovery expanded its capabilities on-premise through acquiring one of the longest-running e-discovery tools on the market.
On March 26, cloud-based e-discovery automation company CloudNine announced it was acquiring the LexisNexis eDiscovery product suite. This includes the LAW PreDiscovery, Early Discovery Analyzer (EDA) and Concordance products. That final one is particularly notable—23.5 percent of respondents to the 2017 LTN Law Firm Tech Survey indicated using the tool for e-discovery.
In addition, CloudNine announced an investment from an affiliate of Peak Rock Capital, through whom it likely received the ability to make the deal. No monetary details to the acquisition have been announced at the time of this writing.
Brad Jenkins, CEO of CloudNine, specifically pointed to the LexisNexis suite's long-standing implementation as an on-premise software offering as a reason for the purchase in a release announcing the move. He explained, “The ability to offer a hybrid of both on-premise and off-premise software coupled with our automated software allows us to support customer needs regardless of their e-discovery task, security, and cost requirements. As a user of many of the purchased product line offerings for more than a decade, we understand their utility and potential. CloudNine plans to invest heavily in improving the support and development for these offerings and we look forward to integrating them into our product portfolio.”
In an FAQ on CloudNine's website, the company added that it plans to allow access to all of the tools in its portfolio to pre-existing users of the LexisNexis and the CloudNine software. For current LexisNexis e-discovery customers, it explained that it will not be looking to fold these products into the cloud—on the contrary, the company noted in the release that it “plans to invest significant resources in the support, development, enhancement, and availability of LAW Pre-Discovery, Concordance, and EDA offerings by offering them as solutions available as part of the CloudNine portfolio of offerings. These offerings will provide the on-premise solutions that will extend the data and legal discovery capability of CloudNine beyond the cloud.”
The company did say that over time, it plans enhance its “combined portfolio of on-premise and off-premise offerings” through “the technical integration and automation of emerging technologies including artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning technologies such as predictive coding in support of Technology Assisted Review (TAR).”
CloudNine added that current pricing schedules and contractual agreements will remain in effect, though over time, the company “plans to offer favorable terms including access to off-premise offerings for current on-premise customers.”
The company's release also did not explicitly state plans for current LexisNexis e-discovery employees, but the FAQ does note that company contacts will remain the same for now. “Current procedures for all business and support requests will remain in effect until customers are notified by their account managers of changes in procedures or contact,” CloudNine said. “Initial plans are for the on-premise team to operate just as they have during their tenure with the LexisNexis e-discovery organization. Over time customers can expect a controlled migration of systems and contacts into a consolidated business and support organization. However, all changes will be proactively communicated to customers to ensure business and executional continuity.”
Legaltech News has reached out to CloudNine for comment and will update as more is known.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250