Epiq Subsidiary AACER Brings Automation To Bankruptcy Law
The new product released by Epiq subsidiary AACER automates cashiering processes for default credits.
March 28, 2018 at 12:05 PM
3 minute read
Practice areas outside of the technology and business-facing sectors have historically had a harder time attracting legal software developers, meaning that law practitioners in these areas often have to adapt technology from other areas to their specific work. Increasingly, however, technology is moving in to serve some of these needs in more proactive ways.
Epiq subsidiary AACER this week launched AACER Cashiering, an automation tool for cashiering processes for default credits. “Historically, providers have worked to address symptoms in this space reactively, and without consumer product orientation,” Noah Ornstein, managing director of the AACER business arm, told LTN.
Here's a look at the new tool:
Who it serves: AACER Cashiering is intended to help any organization dealing with payment receipts from bankruptcy trustees, notably organizations that handle a ton of them. “This typically means a bank, non-bank servicer, loan servicing law firm, corporation or investor,” Ornstein said.
What it does: AACER's new tool essentially tracks trustee payments to specific bankruptcy files and loans monitored within the broader AACER platform and automatically logs and sends payments accordingly. For organizations already using software to track payments, AACER Cashiering can also be integrated into broader technology platforms through its API.
Why it's ripe for automation: Bankruptcy cashiering currently requires a ton of manual management. Especially because trustees tend to send payments in a whole variety of forms, creditors typically rely on people to take payments and log them manually, which does introduce some risk of human error. “The process requires headcount cost and time delay between actual trustee payment and posting of payments,” Ornstein said.
Ornstein plugged the product as a means to have technology manage and reduce some of these concerns. “Epiq identified an opportunity to introduce automation technology to both increase accuracy and reduce cost, processing time, and lost income resulting from current processes,” he said.
Why isn't there more technology for bankruptcy? As Ornstein pointed out, products created to serve the bankruptcy vertical tend to be fairly reactionary, and often fail to look at broader questions about how business processes are handled. Ornstein is hoping that this product, in conjunction with AACER's other bankruptcy-facing offerings, can help change that. “We're working to change the way companies do business to increase their valuation. The future of legal-based processes will be automation based, and eventually integrate various types of artificial intelligence,” Ornstein said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1As 'Red Hot' 2024 for Legal Industry Comes to Close, Leaders Reflect and Share Expectations for Next Year
- 2Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 3Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 4Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 5Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250