Magic Circle Firms Double Down on Legal Smart Contracts
Allen & Overy, Freshfields and Slaughter and May are the latest three firms to link up with the Accord Project to develop industrywide standards for legal smart contracts.
April 03, 2018 at 01:25 PM
3 minute read
The Accord Project, a group launched last year to push for industry standards around legal smart contracts, now has some buy-in from major U.K. law firms.
The three Magic Circle firms joining the project are Allen & Overy, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer and Slaughter and May. They join the ranks of U.S. Big Law firms Dentons, K&L Gates, DLA Piper and others in participating in working groups to jointly create standards for legal smart contracts specific to various practice areas.
Peter Hunn and Houman Shadab, co-founders of the Accord Project, said that they've seen large multinational firms express particular interest in their effort to produce industrywide legal smart contract standards.
“We have had enormous interest from global firms. We see this as indicative of the potential for smart legal contracts to change large-scale, cross-border commerce, and the immediate need for common standards if these efficiencies are to be realized,” Hunn said.
Each of the three joining Magic Circle firms issued statements noting that the Accord Project aligns with the firms' various interest in supporting legal innovation.
“We recognise that smart contracts and blockchain infrastructure have the potential to revolutionize the markets in which we work, so it's vital that we establish robust standards for their use and ensure consistency,” Shruti Ajitsaria, head of Allen & Overy's tech innovation space Fuse, said in a statement
Although blockchain and distributed ledger technology has quickly become synonymous with smart contracts, thanks in part to the rise in interest around cryptocurrency, the Accord Project is intent upon creating “blockchain-agnostic” infrastructure to legally enforceable smart contracts. The group is looking to develop standards around both “on-chain” and “off-chain” contracts.
“When we consider smart legal contracts, it becomes apparent that one doesn't necessarily need all of the characteristics that a blockchain can provide. In fact, to mandate this may be detrimental,” Hunn and Shadab said in a written statement to Legaltech News. “To maximise the benefits distributed ledgers can bring the counterparties to a contract, there is a need for a hybrid implementation that merges the benefits of on-chain execution where applicable with the benefits of off-chain execution.”
Given that the standards are set to be industrywide, the interest and broad participation from Big Law firms seems like it could potentially skew standards to favor large multinational corporations, but the Accord Project founders are hoping that their broad partnership model can help ensure that consumer-facing law practices are given an appropriate voice in the development process.
“We have a number of consumer-focused law firms involved, as well as partnership with Clio that supports this. It is certainly one of the reasons that we open sourced the technology in the first place,” the founders said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1We the People?
- 2New York-Based Skadden Team Joins White & Case Group in Mexico City for Citigroup Demerger
- 3No Two Wildfires Alike: Lawyers Take Different Legal Strategies in California
- 4Poop-Themed Dog Toy OK as Parody, but Still Tarnished Jack Daniel’s Brand, Court Says
- 5Meet the New President of NY's Association of Trial Court Jurists
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250