With 'SoLI' Conference, Vanderbilt Law Set Sights on Legal Innovation Barriers
The one-day Summit on Law and Innovation at Vanderbilt Law will aim to to foster collaboration between legal practitioners, legal educators and technologists.
April 05, 2018 at 11:44 AM
3 minute read
Vanderbilt University Law School. |
In the midst of supporting “legal hackers” meetings and offering courses on blockchain technology, Vanderbilt University Law School is again moving to define the future of the legal industry.
The law school recently announced the launch of The Summit on Law and Innovation (SoLI) a one-day conference on April 30 at Vanderbilt's Nashville, Tennessee, campus. The event aims to foster collaboration between legal practitioners, legal educators and technologists.
SoLI, however, strives to more than just a conference on legal technology. Caitlin Moon, adjunct professor at Vanderbilt Law, noted that “while legal technology is definitely an element to the conversation at SoLI, we do not consider this a legal tech conference. Our focus is on bringing together different voices from different parts of the legal profession for a conversations on collaboration and innovation in the legal profession.”
For Moon, the conference is an attempt to solve one of the biggest roadblocks holding back the legal industry. Working in silos is a “fundamental challenge we face across the legal profession,” she said. “We don't work together, we don't talk to each other, and therefore legal practice isn't truly informing how legal technology is developed, and legal practice is not informing how legal education is developed.”
When asked how the conference will differ from the various other legal and legal tech events throughout the year, Larry Bridgesmith, adjunct professor at Vanderbilt Law School, said that SoLI will not be “a talking heads day.”
Bridgesmith, who called the conference “Ted Talks squared,” explained that the goal of each of the conference's sessions will be to facilitate interaction between audience members. “You will listen to these sort of succinct bursts of information and conversations, and then we will facilitate conversations among the participants.”
Those attending the conference will include professionals from all corners of the legal sector, including law firms, law schools, the legal technology space and the government sector.
But while legal tech vendors are invited to the conference, including “some sponsors who will be present and engaging in the conversation,” SoLI will not host a traditional vendor hall, Moon said.
Though the conference only takes place over one day, the organizers hope to set the stage for future legal innovation projects. “I would consider it a launch date,” Bridgesmith said of the April 30 date. “What we hope to launch are products, forums and consortiums.”
He added that the people who attend SoLI will be committed to “exploring how to help legal change its way to better serve the people….and it's not over when the day ends.”
SoLI however, isn't the only conference looking to offer something novel to legal tech professionals. The launch of the first SoLI conference comes months after the newly formed Association of Legal Technologists (ALT) launched its first inaugural conference. Created by previous members of the International Legal Technology Association's (ILTA) executive team following the association's contentious reorganization, ALT aims to provide a new think tank and networking space to compete with the more traditional legal technology conference.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250