With 'SoLI' Conference, Vanderbilt Law Set Sights on Legal Innovation Barriers
The one-day Summit on Law and Innovation at Vanderbilt Law will aim to to foster collaboration between legal practitioners, legal educators and technologists.
April 05, 2018 at 11:44 AM
3 minute read
In the midst of supporting “legal hackers” meetings and offering courses on blockchain technology, Vanderbilt University Law School is again moving to define the future of the legal industry.
The law school recently announced the launch of The Summit on Law and Innovation (SoLI) a one-day conference on April 30 at Vanderbilt's Nashville, Tennessee, campus. The event aims to foster collaboration between legal practitioners, legal educators and technologists.
SoLI, however, strives to more than just a conference on legal technology. Caitlin Moon, adjunct professor at Vanderbilt Law, noted that “while legal technology is definitely an element to the conversation at SoLI, we do not consider this a legal tech conference. Our focus is on bringing together different voices from different parts of the legal profession for a conversations on collaboration and innovation in the legal profession.”
For Moon, the conference is an attempt to solve one of the biggest roadblocks holding back the legal industry. Working in silos is a “fundamental challenge we face across the legal profession,” she said. “We don't work together, we don't talk to each other, and therefore legal practice isn't truly informing how legal technology is developed, and legal practice is not informing how legal education is developed.”
When asked how the conference will differ from the various other legal and legal tech events throughout the year, Larry Bridgesmith, adjunct professor at Vanderbilt Law School, said that SoLI will not be “a talking heads day.”
Bridgesmith, who called the conference “Ted Talks squared,” explained that the goal of each of the conference's sessions will be to facilitate interaction between audience members. “You will listen to these sort of succinct bursts of information and conversations, and then we will facilitate conversations among the participants.”
Those attending the conference will include professionals from all corners of the legal sector, including law firms, law schools, the legal technology space and the government sector.
But while legal tech vendors are invited to the conference, including “some sponsors who will be present and engaging in the conversation,” SoLI will not host a traditional vendor hall, Moon said.
Though the conference only takes place over one day, the organizers hope to set the stage for future legal innovation projects. “I would consider it a launch date,” Bridgesmith said of the April 30 date. “What we hope to launch are products, forums and consortiums.”
He added that the people who attend SoLI will be committed to “exploring how to help legal change its way to better serve the people….and it's not over when the day ends.”
SoLI however, isn't the only conference looking to offer something novel to legal tech professionals. The launch of the first SoLI conference comes months after the newly formed Association of Legal Technologists (ALT) launched its first inaugural conference. Created by previous members of the International Legal Technology Association's (ILTA) executive team following the association's contentious reorganization, ALT aims to provide a new think tank and networking space to compete with the more traditional legal technology conference.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250