Catalyst Acquires TotalDiscovery, Expanding Legal Hold, Collection Capabilities
The deal will primarily be used to expand Catalyst's core offering to offer an integrated program, Insight Discovery, that spans the EDRM.
April 10, 2018 at 10:08 AM
4 minute read
The race to gobble up midmarket e-discovery companies continues, and this time around, a company that has largely watched M&A activity from the sidelines is getting involved.
On April 10, Catalyst announced it had purchased a majority interest in TotalDiscovery, an e-discovery software provider that specializes in legal hold and data collection software. The deal will primarily be used to expand Catalyst's core offering to provide an integrated program, Insight Discovery, that spans the EDRM from legal hold and identification through collection, processing, search, analytics, review and production.
Financial details for the transaction have not been announced. As reported last week, Catalyst is funded by FTV Global, while TotalDiscovery was previously privately owned.
That expansion to the full EDRM was the major impetus behind the deal, Catalyst CEO John Barr told Legaltech News in a conversation shortly after the deal was announced. He noted that now, Catalyst will be able to offer collection, processing and analytics in a real-time, simultaneous manner.
“Our clients have typically come [to] us for review and analytics technology and services, and many of those organizations would prefer a single vendor and platform to cover as much of the EDRM as possible to lower costs, lower data security risks, lower those inefficient processes that are associated with using disparate products and systems,” he explained. “So by adding legal hold and collection technology, we now offer a full EDRM with a single platform.”
Barr added that this sort of one-stop-shop solution is something that clients, particularly on the corporate side, have been asking for.
“From our perspective, a vendor that can provide a holistic solution to a corporate client or their law firms is really what our clients want—the ability to provide not only the technology but the suite of services on top of that they really need. … When we have been most successful with larger corporations, that's what we've provided them,” Barr said.
According to a press release from Catalyst, current TotalDiscovery customers and channel partners shouldn't expect many immediate changes. TotalDiscovery will “continue to service its clients directly and through its reseller network,” the release said, as well as “offer its full set of features and API” to those it currently works with.
To that end, TotalDiscovery is continuing with its separate branding, Barr confirmed. The company's website already features a logo with the phrase: “TotalDiscovery: A Catalyst Company.”
Catalyst and TotalDiscovery are certainly familiar with one another. The two companies teamed up last fall to release Legal Hold and Collection, an add-on to Catalyst's Insight Enterprise platform. At the time, Catalyst chief technology officer Larry Barela told Legaltech News that the company had chosen TotalDiscovery for the partnership because “[t]hey were the best at what we were looking for. They are a cloud-based technology, they have an API we can write to, it's a small footprint from the installation side, and it's a very powerful application, but it's simple.”
Barr added to LTN, “It helps when you know the guys on the other end of the table and they know you. Everybody knew this was a good idea. … It felt more like two teams getting together than an acquisition.”
Major e-discovery consolidation has been rampant as we move into Q2 2018. The past few weeks have seen two major e-discovery M&A deals, with Consilio and Advanced Discovery joining forces, CloudNine taking over LexisNexis' e-discovery portfolio, and Lighthouse acquiring Swiss chat discovery group Forexus.
While Barr did not say that Catalyst will be making more deals in the future, he did note that M&A is one area of growth his team considers when expanding its product offering. In this case, he said, “It was really about filling in the gaps and knowing this was a great solution for that, and accelerating that time to market. We don't have to build everything, but we also don't have to acquire everything—it was the right mix of ingredients.”
And with the e-discovery market moving quickly, there will be more potential for growth. At the end of his conversation with Legaltech News, Barr added, “There's a real opportunity in front of us, and we're really excited about it. We're pursuing it with all of our vigor and all of our energy right now.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Uber Files RICO Suit Against Plaintiff-Side Firms Alleging Fraudulent Injury Claims
- 2The Law Firm Disrupted: Scrutinizing the Elephant More Than the Mouse
- 3Inherent Diminished Value Damages Unavailable to 3rd-Party Claimants, Court Says
- 4Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 5Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250