Running After Regulations: Nasdaq BWise Announces Rule Management Tool
BWise Regulatory Change Management will offer "augmented regulatory content" that helps explain how a rule change will affect a financial company.
April 10, 2018 at 10:00 AM
4 minute read
Those at the cutting edge of the technology industry face a daunting task in complying with new and changing regulations, but such a challenge is far from new. In the heavily regulated financial industry, for instance, enterprises have always had to keep pace with quickly evolving rules that define how they operate.
Nasdaq BWise, however, is looking to make the task of complying with new regulations more automated through launching its BWise Regulatory Change Management tool. Though not the first ever such regulation management tool, BWise claims its solution is far more robust than anything offered to date.
What it is: BWise Regulatory Change Management is a regulation research and management tool for banks and financial institutions. The solution pulls data from over 330 global regulators to provide regulatory explanations and rule updates in real-time. It also allows users to track rules issued by certain regulators, or in certain jurisdictions, and set alerts about upcoming changes.
How it works: BWise Regulatory Change Management offers “augmented regulatory content,” which it defines as content that has been explained in simple terms by expert human reviewers.
“There are people that are reading these rules, and with their jurisdictional knowledge they will add human interpretation, explaining what it actually means and what a bank needs to comply with,” said Anton Lissone, chief technology officer at Nasdaq BWise.
This interpretation will include impact assessments, which looks at what internal policies the regulatory change will affect and what controls may be needed in-house for compliance. Once alerted to a regulatory change, a company's compliance team, such as its legal department, can send out notifications via the solution to different departments or offices that need to be aware of the change.
These departments and offices can then “look at their own policies and see if the existing policies and controls already cover the regulator obligation,” Lissone said. “If not, they can figure out what needs to happen and document their regulatory actions.”
BWise Regulatory Change Management allows one to track the progress of complying with rule changes through creating reports that document the rule change deadline and any actions taken by specific departments or offices. A company's compliance team can use the reports to inform “the C-suite about the status of regulatory compliance,” Lissone said.
AI future? For now, all content within the solution is interpreted and explained by human reviewers. But Nasdaq BWise is hoping to change that in the future, as the company is looking at using artificial intelligence (AI) technology to automatically provide information on a certain regulatory changes.
The AI would work by statistically analyzing large data sets documenting how companies are responding to a regulatory change and how regulators are enforcing the change. From there, it would determine the best controls a company should have in place to comply with the change, and to what extent regulators are actively enforcing the rule.
“If you can capture how often regulators give sanctions for fines about a particular rule, that says something about the activity of the regulator, and which people are actually following that rule,” Lissone said.
Competition: Two of BWise's biggest competitors in the regulatory management space are Thomson Reuters and LexisNexis, which offer similar solutions that help companies track and comply with regulatory changes.
But Lissone believes that the BWise solution stands out for a number of reasons. For one, “there a lot of the stuff that the regulators publish that is less relevant—they are just notices and things that don't require you to take action. We filter out all the things that are not important,” he said.
What's more, he believes BWise also stands out because it tracks changes in non-U.S. regulations as well and translates them into English for its users.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Connecticut Movers: Year-End Promotions, Hires and an Office Opening
- 2Luigi Mangione Defense Attorney Says NYC Mayor’s Comments on Case Raise Fair Trial Concerns
- 3Revisiting the Boundaries Between Proper and Improper Argument: 10 Years Later
- 4Hochul Vetoes 'Grieving Families' Bill, Faulting a Lack of Changes to Suit Her Concerns
- 5Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Customers: Developments on ‘Conquesting’ from the Ninth Circuit
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250