ABA President Challenges Legal Technologists: 'Be Bold, Be Adventurous, Be Courageous'
At the Stanford CodeX FutureLaw conference, Hilarie Bass noted that the ABA has several initiatives underway to spur technology innovation.
April 12, 2018 at 08:00 AM
4 minute read
|
Hilarie Bass, the president of the American Bar Association (ABA), ventured into the heart of Silicon Valley on April 5, 2018, and challenged the Stanford CodeX FutureLaw conference attendees to “be bold, be adventurous and be courageous” in helping break down the barriers that impede collaboration among lawyers, technologists, and other professionals in shaping the future of legal services.
Bass observed that there is an inherent conflict between the disruptive impact of technological change and the practice of law. Technology, by its nature, is “forward-looking,” while legal training and professional responsibility rules create a legal service environment that is “backward looking” and risk-averse. Bass is concerned that the legal profession may be left behind if it does not innovate.
She pointed to the recommendations of the ABA Commission on the Future of Legal Services and its Recommendation 7 that the “legal profession should partner with other disciplines and the public for insights about innovating the delivery of legal services” to stimulate creative thinking about legal service in the future.
In the face of the factors that obstruct legal technology innovation and adoption there are at least three catalysts that may help break down the silos: clients, law schools, and the ABA.
Bass reported that a growing number of her clients are requiring fixed-fees or other alternative fee agreements. Her firm is not alone. These client demands may create the impetus for law firms to adopt legal technology to make them more efficient in delivering their services, said Bass.
Bass told the conference that the ABA is in the process of updating the Uniform Task-Based Management System (UTBMS) billing codes to work better with electronic billing technologies. The new codes will also be designed to support fixed-fee and alternative fee engagements. The 10 new code sets are scheduled to be announced at the August 2018 ABA annual meeting.
Bass is also hopeful that the ABA Commission on the Future of Legal Education, which was launched on August 17, 2017, will help drive future legal service innovation. During the ABA's mid-year meeting the Commission held an open hearing to address the following questions: How can law schools prepare students for the law jobs of the 21st century? What are the new skillsets not traditionally included in law school curriculum?
Bass mentioned that developments such as an innovation index for law schools may be a resource which prospective law students may use to inform their decision-making and encourage law schools to develop innovation-related courses.
The ABA has several initiatives underway to spur technology innovation. For example, the ABA launched the Center for Innovation in 2016 in response to a recommendation by the Commission on the Future of Legal Services. The goal of the Center is to improve legal services through innovation, education and collaboration. Bass said that the Center selected eight “Innovation Fellows” last year who are currently engaged in various projects to develop technologies designed to improve legal services. In addition, the ABA's revision to comment 8 of Model Rule of Professional Responsibility 1.1 (requiring lawyers to keep abreast of the “benefits and risks” associated with technology) which has been adopted by some states, and the ABA annual Legal Tech show are two other ABA activities intended to help the legal community understand the benefits of technology in delivering legal services.
Bass closed her remarks by imploring the attorneys, technologists, educators, and other professionals at the FutureLaw conference to join the fight to break down the silos impeding the development of innovative legal service delivery.
Mark Michels is a Deloitte Risk and Financial Advisory managing director, Deloitte Transactions and Business Analytics LLP.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250