New Epiq Data Products Group Marks Data Science Push
The legal services and technology company will launch its data products group to move alongside its other innovation teams.
April 13, 2018 at 12:00 PM
4 minute read
Data science and analytics, and its relatively small presence within the legal industry, is the business trend most commonly touted as evidence of the legal industry's Luddite status within the modern economy. But with new investments in data analytics, legal industry operations may be seeing more data-driven work in the future.
Legal services and technology group Epiq has announced the formation of a data products group, a branch of the company's innovation arm. The 30-person team will focus exclusively on potential applications of business analytics and data science in the legal industry, and will work with other innovation teams to weave data insight into its other products and services.
“Improved business and operational analytics related to legal services is something that the industry is hungry for,” Cliff Dutton, chief innovation officer at Epiq, told LTN.
While analytics has been a staple of modern e-discovery and project management practices for at least a few years, Dutton said that innovation in the development and use of analytics have opened up some pathways for other uses of data in legal services.
Epiq's announcement follows a slew of investments in analytics practices in legal technology over the last few years. Data and analytics products like Lex Machina and Ravel Law have expanded to include data covering multiple practice areas. Legal research software company FastCase acquired startup DocketAlarm earlier this year as well, flagging the startup's analytics engine as the core reason for acquisition.
Indeed, a recent study from market research group TechSci estimates that the legal analytics market will grow at a compound annual growth rate of over 32 percent, in value terms, between 2017 and 2022.
Dutton is hoping that Epiq's reach as one of the biggest legal services companies can set the new data products group apart from competitors. “Our scale gives us a unique perspective. Having an internal data science and data products team gives us the ability to leverage that perspective worldwide,” he said.
The growth of analytics, and especially machine learning and predictive analytics, are trends that Dutton saw “growing across the tech industry, not just the legal industry.” Although the legal industry may just now be finding its footing in how it can most effectively apply analytics to shape legal work, trying to leverage technology that the broader business market is using can help organizations at least keep pace. “Having this group will allow us to maintain alignment with our products and services with the broader application of AI and machine learning,” he said.
With today's news cycle dominated by headlines around Facebook head Mark Zuckerberg's congressional testimony and use of the social media site's data by political consulting group Cambridge Analytica, questions about data ownership and data privacy now increasingly go hand-in-hand with new data projects.
Dutton said the data products group will not use any aggregated data, and is “client-oriented and client permissioned,” exclusively. The group does, however, hope to use public data sets around legal performance and outcomes to inform the insights available in client data, essentially “to marry those two data sets,” Dutton noted.
Looking ahead, Dutton said the data products groups aims to tackle larger legal data projects, such as “improved legal risk metrics and compliance solutions that can be developed from data we have access to.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250