Tales From the Legal Tech Startup Community: Fundraising While Pregnant
Basha Rubin and Mirra Levitt, the co-founders of Priori Legal, managed to land a major tech incubator investment, but dealing with fundraising and pregnancy at the same time wasn't easy.
April 17, 2018 at 01:27 PM
5 minute read
When Basha Rubin and Mirra Levitt first decided they'd start actively fundraising from venture capitalists for Priori Legal, they weren't anticipating an easy road ahead. They both knew that legal technology companies don't usually fare well with the Bay Area tech venture capitalism community and that women-led businesses especially struggle with gender discrimination in fundraising.
They also didn't anticipate that they would both get pregnant right in the middle of their fundraising round. Somehow though, they made it work.
Rubin and Levitt originally met at Yale Law School, where they saw a lot of obvious legal business issues through the jobs and clinics they worked in: lack of staffing transparency, inability to compare quality of attorneys, inefficiency in using attorney time. They decided to make a run at a legal tech startup.
Rubin and Levitt started Priori as a platform meant to connect smaller businesses to legal counsel, but found that while their customers were usually happy and excited about their work, they couldn't find sustainable ways to scale the platform out.
Rubin was a little hesitant about bringing in investors early on. While venture capital can bring in cash to support business development, it also gives venture capitalists looking to bolster their potential return on investment a great deal of power in shaping the direction and scale of the companies they invest in.
“I was reticent to bring venture capital into the room before we had a clear path to scale, which enabled us to experiment with the business.” Rubin said. The company took a few years to work through its market and value proposition before bringing outside capital into the room and ultimately decided to shift away from its original target market, small and mid-sized businesses, and instead tailor the product towards corporate counsel.
“Moving into the corporate counsel space has been a fantastic decision,” she said. Corporate counsel plan their outside counsel budgets proactively, typically have more money to spend, and need to make more hiring decisions. They're seen in the legal market as drivers of innovation. The pivot allowed Rubin and Levitt to keep working towards the same structural issues they saw in the legal industry while employing a profitable business model.
Once they settled on a corporate counsel-focused product, Rubin and Levitt thought they had a product that deserved venture capital-level scaling, and decided to pursue the venture route. Shortly thereafter, they realized that they'd both inadvertently decided to start families at almost exactly the same time.
Rubin and Levitt both spent the last few months of their respective pregnancies in and out of meetings with venture capital associates. Rubin even took a meeting to pitch the platform from the hospital while she was in labor, because it had taken so long to schedule the meeting in the first place.
The period was not one that Rubin remembers particularly fondly. At this point, she can't say for sure what factors about their companies were toughest for investors to swallow. “Of course, it's hard not to wonder when you have not one, but two co-founders who are nine months pregnant why investors turn you down, as if legal technology is easy to raise money for in the first place! For the most part, I chose not give that logic too much credence,” she said.
“At a certain point, you never know. It was certainly unpleasant and uncomfortable, but both pregnancy and fundraising are unpleasant and uncomfortable in lots of ways, and I've never fundraised not pregnant, so I can't say with confidence that pregnancy exacerbated it,” she added.
Though the fundraising process was tough, Rubin and Levitt were well-backed by support staff. Despite the uncertainty of the process, none of their team jumped ship, allowing Rubin and Levitt to really focus on getting connected to potential funders.
“One of the advantages of not having had investors and planning a slower growth plan early on is that we experimented a lot with who fit and who did not fit in the team and how we can build a culture that was supportive and transparent,” Rubin said.
Rubin and Levitt eventually connected with Eve Burton, senior vice president of the Hearst Corp. and co-founder of technology incubator HearstLab, which works exclusively with women-led startups. Priori landed a partnership with the incubator, giving the company a new funding stream, office space within Hearst's legal services operation and a direct line to Burton herself, who also heads up global legal services for Hearst.
“HearstLab and Eve have already driven unquantifiable value beyond the money they invested in us: to be hosted by a general counsel's office, in terms of product testing, in terms of feature development, in terms of 'which of the following taglines resonate with you the most,' having them be very active Priori users and say, 'I got tripped up on this' or those sorts of things,” Rubin said.
Ultimately, Rubin thinks the decision to pursue venture money when they did worked well for the company. “Waiting paid off,” she said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Pa. Defense Firm Sued by Client Over Ex-Eagles Player's $43.5M Med Mal Win
- 2Losses Mount at Morris Manning, but Departing Ex-Chair Stays Bullish About His Old Firm's Future
- 3Zoom Faces Intellectual Property Suit Over AI-Based Augmented Video Conferencing
- 4Judge Grants TRO Blocking Federal Funding Freeze
- 5Bar Groups Say IOLA Settlement Protects Civil Litigants' Fund From Future 'Raids'
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250