Decisions, Decisions, Decisions: You Can't Master What You Don't Measure
Attorneys are finding that a quality data stream and audience-specific data models are essential to coping with the realities of the modern legal marketplace.
April 18, 2018 at 08:00 AM
5 minute read
Law firms and corporate legal departments are not immune from the rush to attach metrics to performance. In a legal business environment, where there is high pressure to drive performance while consistently reducing costs, the ability to accurately measure and tell the story of success is becoming as important as achieving it.
Relatively recently, general counsel and C-level executives might have left technology decisions to the “IT guys.” However, legal practitioners are realizing that they need to participate in making informed decisions about legal operations, from e-billing—and especially complying with global e-billing regulations—to enterprise legal management systems.
Data was once something for “processers” or something to be “input” by staff. However, attorneys are finding that a quality data stream and audience-specific data models are essential to coping with the realities of the modern legal marketplace. They also require appropriate business intelligence visualizations—or dashboards—to provide meaningful, actionable intelligence, stripped of tech jargon.
Democratizing Data for Outcomes
In a recent survey, Hyperion Global Partners found that the ability to both analyze data and assess its impact is becoming essential to a growing diversity of business stakeholders. It is not just the general counsel and senior attorneys consuming analytics, which were the traditional reporting lines. More than half of legal operations managers are now analyzing data for impact, as well as C-level executives, outside counsel and finance management/procurement.
What began as buzz is now exploding into a near-universal demand. At the heart of the surge in the use of analytics are key performance indicators (KPIs), which are how staff, attorneys, management and executives gain real time insight into current activities, guide course correction, suggest areas for process improvement and offer internal indices to manage strategy.
Performance analysis, insight, stakeholder visibility and operational efficiency are the fundamental components that drive excellence. Performance management analytics comprise the tools, capture methods, data models and visualization technologies that help legal organizations focus on the operational performance metrics they need, to help them understand both the business effect of their activities—causality, impacting processes and behavior—and the corrective steps, nee actionable intelligence, they need to optimize performance and outcomes.
In legal, six categories of KPIs comprise the cornerstones for an operational decision support program; they measure:
- Legal Spend;
- Caseload;
- Outcomes;
- Value;
- Efficiency; and
- Quality.
The process of planning for the use of metrics and KPIs as operational tools can be arduous. Many performance management programs fail to launch over the hurdle of defining what you want to measure, why you want to measure it, and how best to create the models to measure what you seek.
The obstacles to reporting strike right at the heart of operational excellence—you can't master what you don't know how to measure.
We have seen an increasing number of organizations begin to roll out KPI programs, with two in five legal organizations having defined and measuring at least few KPIs. Though spend analytics are, arguably, a very mature and sophisticated discipline in legal analytics, bolstered by over 20 years of e-billing data (the original “big data”), we have also observed a deliberate shift of focus from traditional spend metrics to more operational categories: 44 percent of legal organizations rate internal process metrics as the most important metric they track.
However, as a profession we are still a long way from analytics-based practice management. Though more than half of legal ops executives express confidence in their ability to manage the entire matter lifecycle, fewer than a third feel they have the tools to effectively use data for improved outcomes. We have found in our research that this is a common cognitive dissonance—“confidence” it seems, is less grounded in actualized operational capabilities than generalized sentiments about the company's overall abilities to succeed and its confidence in the strength of its people and resources. Confidence is an esoteric benchmark. Generally speaking, operational performance management is far less mature in legal than in many other business disciplines.
Dashboarding for Operational Excellence
Dashboarding is a growing area of focus for legal technologists, precisely because of the strength of dashboards for reach and actionability. In fact, 35 percent of legal operations managers identify data democratization (15%) and increased efficiency (20%) as their leading value drivers for dashboarding, emphasizing the simplicity and velocity of data analysis that it delivers.
Careful planning of an inviting dashboard allows stakeholders to analyze data quickly with better focus and with more confidence. By delivering easily accessible and easy-to-digest visualizations (of complex and voluminous raw data), more actors—management, administrators, general counsel, business managers, billing analysts and others—can easily be looped into common information paradigms and collaborative operational coordination.
Dashboards deliver transparency and analytical richness. With dashboarding, the background complexities of data ownership can be rolled up effectively into an at-a-glance index. Further, while departmental financial data itself can be compelling, metrics that cut across departments and databases—12-month client revenue vs. annualized billable hours, or outside legal spend vs internal headcount, for instance—make dashboards a potentially powerful operational analysis tool. This is the key differentiator between reviewing “reporting” and using dynamic data for informed decision-making.
As President and CEO of Hyperion Global Partners, Eyal Iffergan leads the premier global consultancy for legal business strategy and operations. With over 20 years of leadership in advising the legal and intellectual property business communities, Iffergan brings broad-based legal process and technology experience to managing influential global practices and companies, including founding and building several market-revolutionizing enterprises.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 15th Circuit Considers Challenge to Louisiana's Ten Commandments Law
- 2Crocs Accused of Padding Revenue With Channel-Stuffing HEYDUDE Shoes
- 3E-discovery Practitioners Are Racing to Adapt to Social Media’s Evolving Landscape
- 4The Law Firm Disrupted: For Office Policies, Big Law Has Its Ear to the Market, Not to Trump
- 5FTC Finalizes Child Online Privacy Rule Updates, But Ferguson Eyes Further Changes
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250