Decisions, Decisions, Decisions: You Can't Master What You Don't Measure
Attorneys are finding that a quality data stream and audience-specific data models are essential to coping with the realities of the modern legal marketplace.
April 18, 2018 at 08:00 AM
5 minute read
Law firms and corporate legal departments are not immune from the rush to attach metrics to performance. In a legal business environment, where there is high pressure to drive performance while consistently reducing costs, the ability to accurately measure and tell the story of success is becoming as important as achieving it.
Relatively recently, general counsel and C-level executives might have left technology decisions to the “IT guys.” However, legal practitioners are realizing that they need to participate in making informed decisions about legal operations, from e-billing—and especially complying with global e-billing regulations—to enterprise legal management systems.
Data was once something for “processers” or something to be “input” by staff. However, attorneys are finding that a quality data stream and audience-specific data models are essential to coping with the realities of the modern legal marketplace. They also require appropriate business intelligence visualizations—or dashboards—to provide meaningful, actionable intelligence, stripped of tech jargon.
|Democratizing Data for Outcomes
In a recent survey, Hyperion Global Partners found that the ability to both analyze data and assess its impact is becoming essential to a growing diversity of business stakeholders. It is not just the general counsel and senior attorneys consuming analytics, which were the traditional reporting lines. More than half of legal operations managers are now analyzing data for impact, as well as C-level executives, outside counsel and finance management/procurement.
What began as buzz is now exploding into a near-universal demand. At the heart of the surge in the use of analytics are key performance indicators (KPIs), which are how staff, attorneys, management and executives gain real time insight into current activities, guide course correction, suggest areas for process improvement and offer internal indices to manage strategy.
Performance analysis, insight, stakeholder visibility and operational efficiency are the fundamental components that drive excellence. Performance management analytics comprise the tools, capture methods, data models and visualization technologies that help legal organizations focus on the operational performance metrics they need, to help them understand both the business effect of their activities—causality, impacting processes and behavior—and the corrective steps, nee actionable intelligence, they need to optimize performance and outcomes.
In legal, six categories of KPIs comprise the cornerstones for an operational decision support program; they measure:
- Legal Spend;
- Caseload;
- Outcomes;
- Value;
- Efficiency; and
- Quality.
The process of planning for the use of metrics and KPIs as operational tools can be arduous. Many performance management programs fail to launch over the hurdle of defining what you want to measure, why you want to measure it, and how best to create the models to measure what you seek.
The obstacles to reporting strike right at the heart of operational excellence—you can't master what you don't know how to measure.
We have seen an increasing number of organizations begin to roll out KPI programs, with two in five legal organizations having defined and measuring at least few KPIs. Though spend analytics are, arguably, a very mature and sophisticated discipline in legal analytics, bolstered by over 20 years of e-billing data (the original “big data”), we have also observed a deliberate shift of focus from traditional spend metrics to more operational categories: 44 percent of legal organizations rate internal process metrics as the most important metric they track.
However, as a profession we are still a long way from analytics-based practice management. Though more than half of legal ops executives express confidence in their ability to manage the entire matter lifecycle, fewer than a third feel they have the tools to effectively use data for improved outcomes. We have found in our research that this is a common cognitive dissonance—“confidence” it seems, is less grounded in actualized operational capabilities than generalized sentiments about the company's overall abilities to succeed and its confidence in the strength of its people and resources. Confidence is an esoteric benchmark. Generally speaking, operational performance management is far less mature in legal than in many other business disciplines.
|Dashboarding for Operational Excellence
Dashboarding is a growing area of focus for legal technologists, precisely because of the strength of dashboards for reach and actionability. In fact, 35 percent of legal operations managers identify data democratization (15%) and increased efficiency (20%) as their leading value drivers for dashboarding, emphasizing the simplicity and velocity of data analysis that it delivers.
Careful planning of an inviting dashboard allows stakeholders to analyze data quickly with better focus and with more confidence. By delivering easily accessible and easy-to-digest visualizations (of complex and voluminous raw data), more actors—management, administrators, general counsel, business managers, billing analysts and others—can easily be looped into common information paradigms and collaborative operational coordination.
Dashboards deliver transparency and analytical richness. With dashboarding, the background complexities of data ownership can be rolled up effectively into an at-a-glance index. Further, while departmental financial data itself can be compelling, metrics that cut across departments and databases—12-month client revenue vs. annualized billable hours, or outside legal spend vs internal headcount, for instance—make dashboards a potentially powerful operational analysis tool. This is the key differentiator between reviewing “reporting” and using dynamic data for informed decision-making.
As President and CEO of Hyperion Global Partners, Eyal Iffergan leads the premier global consultancy for legal business strategy and operations. With over 20 years of leadership in advising the legal and intellectual property business communities, Iffergan brings broad-based legal process and technology experience to managing influential global practices and companies, including founding and building several market-revolutionizing enterprises.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250