What Does the UK's Top Fraud Investigator Want in E-discovery Tech?
The UK's Serious Fraud Office has brought in several AI-powered e-discovery platforms to help with its document-intensive cases. But this agency is far from a normal e-discovery buyer.
April 19, 2018 at 08:00 AM
5 minute read
Though e-discovery market in the U.K. isn't as mature as it is in the U.S., the country is making strides bringing e-discovery into the mainstream. The U.K.'s Serious Fraud Office (SFO), for instance, recently announced that it has brought in OpenText's AI-powered Axcelerate document review system to help with its investigative efforts.
To be sure, the agency is far from the only government entity leveraging e-discovery technology in its operations. But the SFO is not your average e-discovery buyer. “We are not a law firm, we are not an in-house team, we have requirements that are specific to us because we are an investigator and prosecutor,” said Ben Denison, chief technology officer at the SFO.
Even among U.K. regulators, the SFO is unique. Whereas most regulators will handle a high volume of cases, the fraud agency focuses only on a select number. “We take on seven to 10 new cases each year, and each case can take five to seven years,” Denison said.
What's more, the cases can include enormous amounts of documents. A fraud case against Rolls-Royce PLC that was settled in 2017, for instance, had around 30 million documents, one of the largest cases the agency ever handled, Denison said.
Given the SFO's requirements, its demand for artificial intelligence (AI)-powered e-discovery technology is unique. The agency needs an e-discovery tool that can be responsive to documents that include privileged content. Denison noted that in any case the SFO takes on, “companies will turn over emails, servers and laptops, which will include privileged material that we can't use as part of our investigation.” Streamlining the process to identify privileged material, therefore, is a key criteria for the agency.
Another requirement is that any tool be able to adapt to the SFO's specific evidence handling workflow and integrate with all the systems already in use. After seizing materials from a company, “that material is all then put into evidence back and tracked into our evidence systems… and that approach is different form a regulatory and a law firm,” Denison said.
Any e-discovery system the SFO uses has to be capable of tracking a large amount of documents, so the agency looks for platforms with advanced analytics tools, “which really help you cut through large amounts of data,” including email threading and graphical representations around communications between different parties, Denison said.
The SFO has used other AI-powered e-discovery technology besides OpenText's Axcelerate. The agency for example, had an ongoing relationship with RAVN Systems when it was handling the Rolls-Royce case. RAVN was able to adapt their AI-powered Applied Cognitive Engine (ACE) to help SFO review the Rolls-Royce investigation documents.
The platform was a great help for the SFO because it could “go through and say with certainty what documents were not privileged,” Denison said. He added that, with the technology, the agency was able to review documents faster and for about 80 percent cheaper when compared to manual human review.
The SFO was also able to quickly train RAVN to identify content that was not privileged “because we were doing the manual review for some time, and we had a fairly large seed set we could work with,” Denison explained. But training AI e-discovery platforms to find privileged content in other data sets, he added, required them to create entirely new seed sets.
“What we have seen with the privilege example is that it varies form case to case, so you would effectively have to come up with a seed set for each case and retrain it,” Denison said.
Beyond RAVN, the SFO looked to bring more AI e-discovery capabilities in-house when it decided to update its old e-discovery platform, which it had used since 2009. It reached out to a range of vendors with its requirements and eventually whittled the choice down to three e-discovery platforms. Recommind was chosen by the agency—though the SFO soon realized they would be working with OpenText. The day the bid was accepted “was the day OpenText announced they were acquiring Recommind,” Denison recalled.
Denison noted that the new OpenText platform met all the agency's requirements and that the SFO is deploying it for a case that has overtaken the Rolls-Royce investigation in terms of sheer number of documents to be reviewed. The new case “has just passed 50 million and continues to grow.”
The SFO has also been impressed by how much help AI has been and believes it will be a game-changer for the agency in the months and years to come. While predictive coding in the U.K. has only thus far been used in civil cases, the agency believes it's only a matter of time before it makes its way across the country's judicial system.
“Predictive coding isn't used in criminal case in any jurisdictions … but somebody is going to be the first to do that, and it may be us,” Denison said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1AI: An Enhancement, Not a Replacement for Attorneys
- 2Fowler White Burnett Opens Jacksonville Office Focused on Transportation Practice
- 3Auditor Finds 'Significant Deficiency' in FTC Accounting to Tune of $7M
- 4'A Mockery' of Deposition Rules: Walgreens Wins Sanctions Dispute Over Corporate Witness Allegedly Unfamiliar With Company
- 5Call for Nominations: TLI's Pennsylvania Legal Awards 2025
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250