Clearview Social Looks to Automate Attorney Blogging With PostHaste Tool
The blog automation and management platform strives to help attorneys engage more with conversations online.
April 20, 2018 at 01:25 PM
4 minute read
Photo: lechatnoir/iStock |
While many legal technology developers have focused their efforts on areas like e-discovery and contract management, some are starting to offer solutions for more business-focused needs.
Clearview Social, for example, launched its eponymous social media management tool in 2014 to help law firms better execute social media marketing. Now, the company is looking to further innovate legal marketing with the launch of PostHaste, a blog automation and management platform that aims to help attorneys engage more with conversations online.
Adrian Dayton, founder and CEO of Clearview Social, described PostHaste as a tool for attorneys “to quickly assemble reactions to certain issues” and “give their unique insight.”
PostHaste is installed as an extension on web browsers. When attorneys are reading content that interests them online, they can highlight a quote or passage they want to respond to and click the PostHaste extension, which will bring up a template for a blog post.
The template will automatically contain the highlighted passage as a block quote and make sure to give proper attribution to its original author. Based on the passage, PostHaste will also use artificial intelligence software to recommend an accompanying picture from Shutterstock, which has a partnership with Clearview that gives the platform's users rights to stock images.
PostHaste will also recommend a title for the blog post and show the user a selection of tweets that have responded to the content from which the original passage was pulled.
An attorney then writes the blog content, which PostHaste will automatically either publish to the attorney's WordPress blog or any proprietary website the attorney's law firm may have. PostHaste can also first send the blog to a law firm's marketing team for approval, or have the marketing team assign attorneys specific blog topics through an editorial calendar.
Dayton noted that the idea for PostHaste came out of the fact that while attorneys and their law firms appreciated Clearview Social, they did not have much content to promote. “I found that almost half of the firms just weren't creating enough content to get really any benefit from social media,” he said.
He added that “we wanted to give them an easy way to become part of a bigger conversation” around topics they were interested in or had expertise through their practice areas.
The ultimate goal of Clearview Social and PostHaste is to allow law firms to increase their social media presence and engagement in order to attract more clients and business. But social media doesn't always come easy for attorneys.
Much like their clients and judges, attorneys can face legal risks by being too active on social media or blogging websites. Dayton, however, believes that law firms have realized the business advantages of having an online presence. “In terms of firms wanting their lawyers to stay off of social media, I heard that a lot eight years ago, but now what I'm hearing from firms is the exact opposite.”
Still, some argue that the legal marketing space is being inundated with too much content, with an emphasis on quantity over quality. But Dayton believes that this is a problem of having too many marketers write content and enough attorneys engaging online.
“I've heard this discussion about there is so much content already, do we really need more content that isn't high quality?” he said. “To be honest, the people that are creating the most content out there—and let's just call it what it is, it's just garbage—are people hiring marketing or public relations professionals to write for them.”
“When you think about it, the people we really want to hear from really want insights from our the experts,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Court System Seeks Public Comment on E-Filing for Annual Report
- 2Foreign-Company Lobbyists Would Need to Register Under Proposed DOJ Regulation
- 3'Fancy Dress': ERISA Claim Accuses Plan Administrator and Cigna Affiliates of Co-Pay Maximizer Scheme
- 4The American Lawyer's Top Stories of 2024
- 5Semiconductor Component Maker Accused of Deceiving Investors About Market Downturn, Export Curbs
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250