5 Steps for Beginners to Implement a Knowledge Management System
Knowledge management experts from Baker McKenzie and Cisco ran KM newcomers through their tips for starting a system at the 2018 CLOC Conference.
April 24, 2018 at 01:19 PM
6 minute read
Hey, you there! Heard about knowledge management (KM) but don't know where to start? Don't worry, there's a whole number of people just like you. At least 60 of them were at the “Practical Advice on Building a Knowledge Management Roadmap” session at the 2018 CLOC Conference. I'm right with you, too, which is why I sat in on the beginners-portion of the session, led by Emily Colantino, director of knowledge management at Baker McKenzie's energy, mining and infrastructure industry group, and Steve Harmon, vice president and deputy general counsel at Cisco.
In their half of the panel, Colantino and Harmon led newcomers through a few ways to start their own KM systems. Here's how they said to get started:
|Lesson 1: Come Up With a Strategy
In a pre-CLOC survey that Colantino shared, 40 percent of the roughly 160 respondents had no KM plan in place. But even if it's not a perfectly formed strategy from day one, Colantino posited, “We would offer to you that even starting a KM plan would be a good way to get your program off and running.”
Harmon noted that finding a basis for a knowledge management strategy reminded him of Simon Sinek's book “Start With Why.” “You need to figure out what the purpose is of having a KM program in the first place. Why do we have it?”
For Cisco, the answer to that question stemmed from what he said was GC Mark Chandler's overall vision for the legal department: “to enable the business to design, build and sell its products in a legal and efficient way.” Or, as Harmon put it, “The only reason I get paid is there are a bunch of talented engineers building products to sell.”
From there, the knowledge management strategy can begin to form in alignment with the organization's overall goals. Oftentimes, Harmon added, that means standardized, repeatable processes that help common problem areas: “The reality in most legal organizations is that we don't need to produce art; we need to produce prints.”
|Lesson 2: Finding Resources Through Incentives
What good is a knowledge management system if nobody wants to contribute to it? That's what a lot of first-time KM implementations face, so actually getting the system up and running may take some incentives.
Harmon likened it to an economics issue, saying, “Everyone wants to feed from the fishery, but nobody wants to supply the fish. There's a lot of demand for people to pull things from the system, but not as much demand to supply things to the system.”
At Cisco, he said, one way to encourage contributions to the KM system was to focus on career goals. “In the context of our knowledge management efforts, if you're one of the largest contributors to our knowledge management open source systems, and assuming that what you contribute is worthwhile, it's one of the best ways to set yourself apart from your peers.”
For Baker McKenzie, meanwhile, Colantino added that it's important to get creative, and to cast a wide net when finding people to possibly contribute. “I've always been surprised that when I ask a question to a large number of people, those who raise their hands are ones I might not have thought of in the first place,” she explained.
|Lesson 3: Create a Culture
So you have a plan, and you have some initial buy-in. How do you make sure it's sustainable? Colantino said what's necessary is “establishing a culture that encourages and rewards knowledge sharing.”
She added, “The tone needs to come from the top. The key stakeholders need to be consulted on your strategy and buy in.” At Baker McKenzie, this means designated “knowledge champions”—people from the executive team or, in the case of law firms, partners that are appraised of and have a stake in the KM system's success.
Harmon also called “this the hardest piece of KM.” In one example he recounted, an internal process organization implemented a rule: Anyone that assigns a high threshold of complexity to a certain project can't close the case unless they confirm that whatever made it complex is noted in the knowledge management tool. This set up a quandary for those who didn't want to contribute: They needed throughput to be high with complex work, so they couldn't put off the cases, even if they didn't want to contribute.
|Lesson 4: Starting Simple With Document Collection
Even if you don't have a formal knowledge management system, you probably have documents that attorneys use to help one another. Colantino said these documents are a great place to start collecting for your new system, explaining, “Start with what you have, because you probably have more than you think you have.”
The two important aspects for all documents in the system, she explained, are that they need to be useful and easy to get to. Concerning the latter, she added, “It doesn't matter what documents you have if you can't get to them. … You need to choose a level of complexity that mirrors your company.”
This also means routine maintenance of articles that are out of date. She recounted that upon starting a KM system a few years ago, Baker McKenzie noticed that some of the most-read documents were introductory topics that hadn't been updated since the early 2000s. “Stale content immediately discredits the system,” she explained.
Harmon agreed, adding that it's “kind of surgery with an ax” in deciding an updating and deletion process for old KM system content. “I tend to take the view that curation is a high-margin exercise, but it's high cost as well,” he explained.
|Lesson 5: Standardize and Streamline Your Forms
Finally, they noted that many documents can be standardized for use throughout an organization, especially those documents that are often developed in multiple practice areas throughout the practice. Similar to regular document analysis, Colantino explained that these standard forms need to be useful, accessible, and up-to-date. Furthermore, they need to be prioritized for the highest volume of legal work.
“I find that standard-form documents lend themselves to a quantitative analysis,” she said. “If we have two documents that take two hours a piece for 52 weeks—take two by two by 52, and that's over 200 hours saved.”
She said that these standard forms can come from a number of places, including internal documents, industry organization documents like the American Bar Association or state bars like the New York State Bar Association, companies that sell these documents like Practical Law Co., and even publicly filed boilerplate documents.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Call for Nominations: Elite Trial Lawyers 2025
- 2Senate Judiciary Dems Release Report on Supreme Court Ethics
- 3Senate Confirms Last 2 of Biden's California Judicial Nominees
- 4Morrison & Foerster Doles Out Year-End and Special Bonuses, Raises Base Compensation for Associates
- 5Tom Girardi to Surrender to Federal Authorities on Jan. 7
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250