From Nigeria to Brazil to Canada: Access to Justice Tech on the International Stage
The array of access to justice solutions presented at the Global Legal Hackathon's final round highlighted how such tech is taking hold around the world.
April 24, 2018 at 06:30 AM
4 minute read
|
The Global Legal Hackathon—a legal tech development competition that boasted participants from across five continents and, in the first round, over 40 cities—held its third and final round in New York on April 21. Of the 14 remaining participants, two team were chosen as winners for the public sector tech category.
But while only two access to justice solutions took the top spots, many more competed in the monthslong event. The scope and diversity of these solutions underscored how such tech is shaping up across the world in response to both local and global problems.
A Florianópolis, Brazil-based team, for instance, developed a solution named Apresente-se that allows local citizens to remotely be present before justice officials when needed. Alexandre Golin Krammes, product adviser at Softplan and a part of the Apresente-se team, noted that being present before a court can oftentimes be an arduous and time consuming endeavor because of his country's overburdened judicial system.
“Nowadays in Brazil going to the court, they have long lines and the court has to have available employees to check them and say everything is OK,” he said.
The solution uses an array of technologies, including voice recognition, to authenticate a person's location. “A judge could sentence a person to be at this house at 8 p.m., and they can assess his voice, his photo, and his location,” through the solution to be able to prove it is him, Krammes said.
Apresente-se, however, didn't need win the Global legal Hackathon to get its solution off the ground. “Before the final, we got a client so we have a greater challenge to do,” Krammes added.
A Lagos, Nigeria-based team also found success for its solution, named Lemon Aid, before the end of the hackathon competition. Acting as a type of pro bono management app, the solution uses algorithms to analyze existing magistrate cases and match them with pro bono lawyers, who have profiles on the app.
Lemon Aid “suggests lawyers for four or five cases based on their profile,” said Deborah Patrick-Akhaba, associate at Goldsmiths Solicitors and member of the Lemon Aid team. She added that the solution will look to connect with pro bono lawyers at law firms as well as freelance lawyers and senior advocates who “need to do a level of pro bono work” by law in Nigeria.
Lemon Aid, which specifically aims to solve prison overcrowding and lack of legal representation in Nigeria, has already caught the attention of some in the country's government. Patrick-Akhaba noted that the Federal Ministry of Justice of Nigeria has agreed to partner with the young company. What's more, the team is looking at a “partnership with legal aid organizations, and we are looking to also expand to the broader African market,” she said.
Meanwhile, an Ottawa, Canada-based team sought to tackle access to justice in a different way through its 2Sign app. The solution works to automatically draft contracts for consumers in a variety of situations, offering agreements such as leasing or buy and sell contracts. Users can input voice answers to promoted questions, and the app will automatically draft a pre-selected contract.
Ahmed Asif, chief technology officer at 2Sign, explained that there will also be accountability and security features built in to verify the parties who entered into the contract.
“It will look at the location of the buyer and seller, so if they are within 20 meters of each other” when the contract was automatically drafted and signed, they can be verified, Asif said. He added that his team also plans to add other authentication features in the near future, such as requiring users and parties to register with the app before they draft a contract.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllRussia-Linked Deepfakes Are Hitting the US Election. Will It Spur Congress to Act?
Legaltech Rundown: Uptime Legal Systems Acquires LexCloud, Spellbook Integrates With Practical Law, and More
3 minute readPre/Dicta Expands Litigation Analytics Platform to California, Its First Venture Into State Courts
3 minute readTrending Stories
- 1Infant Formula Judge Sanctions Kirkland's Jim Hurst: 'Overtly Crossed the Lines'
- 2Abbott, Mead Johnson Win Defense Verdict Over Preemie Infant Formula
- 3Guarantees Are Back, Whether Law Firms Want to Talk About Them or Not
- 4Trump Files $10B Suit Against CBS in Amarillo Federal Court
- 5Preparing Your Law Firm for 2025: Smart Ways to Embrace AI & Other Technologies
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250