Maybe AI Can't Do Everything, but Corporate Legal's Still Trying to Adopt
Legal operations directors from Walmart and Nationwide gave their artificial intelligence adoption strategies at the 2018 CLOC Conference.
April 24, 2018 at 04:55 PM
5 minute read
When looking at instituting artificial intelligence in the legal department, there's one objection that's perhaps more common than any other: “We don't need that much complexity.” But there's one issue with that, said Tariq Abdullah, senior director of legal operations at Walmart Inc.
“Every company's a technology company, whether they realize it or not,” he explained. “And if you don't realize it, that's a problem.”
The entire economy, and furthermore the world, runs online and with technologies that seemed inconceivable 50 years ago. And every corporate legal department needs to be forward-looking to keep up with the change, which today means understanding AI and other automation technologies.
Operations directors from Walmart and Nationwide gave their strategies for getting ahead of the curve at the “It's Here & It's Real: Next Generation AI Litigation Solutions Essential for Legal Department Saving” panel at the 2018 CLOC Conference. And they all agreed that it's important to recognize what AI actually is and what it's not.
Moderator James M. Lee, co-founder and CEO at AI software company LegalMation, noted that widespread AI marketing like IBM's Watson on “Jeopardy!” may have actually done a disservice, as it “sent the wrong message to the public, because people think that this black box can do anything, and that's not true.”
Lee said AI is “nothing more than a pattern recognition machine. That's it.” He added, “When you drive into work, your mind's wondering half the time. It's because you've been driving so long that it's second nature to you. So it makes sense that driverless cars are one of the first applications of AI.”
Still, disinformation remains, even among those well-versed in other types of technologies. Indeed, Tom Paider, associate vice president, BSA Leader, OCLO & HR IT, Nationwide, noted that his first task when instituting a new tool is spending “an inordinate amount of time in the technology shop explaining what it is and what it isn't, and what it's actually going to replace.”
To make this case, Nationwide has developed a spectrum of implementable technologies, ranging from common applications like Word and Excel to full AI. He explained that it's often best to start somewhere in the middle when driving change, to get internal clients used to new technologies before moving on to full AI.
“I know business process management and robotic process automation aren't AI,” Paider explained. But “sometimes those things give us entry points with our customers.”
Alan Bryan, senior associate general counsel, Walmart, added that at his company, encouraging adoption is a matter of demonstrating value. “I'd rather the attorney spend four more hours preparing for the critical deposition and adding value that way,” Bryan explained.
This value is easier to demonstrate if it's connected to other parts of the business, Paider noted. He explained that he took a cue from both Nationwide's internal IT and R&D departments to foster a culture of exploration and discovery within legal as well.
“My advice would be, especially for those of you in big corporations, save some of your R&D dollars for pure play,” he added. “Some of the things, you just have to explore. AI's not going away, it's just going to get more and more advanced. So the more your company can get ahead of that curve, the better.”
This type of intellectual curiosity is paramount, Abdullah agreed, saying, “It all starts with that curiosity mindset, of what if?” Without having the curiosity to want to change, new technologies like AI will never be able to get a foothold.
“There's almost a renaissance that's happening now, and it's happening whether people want to admit it or not,” Abdullah said. “They need to embrace it and part of the leadership in that change, or they will be run over by it.”
And of course, this change is most effective if it comes from the top—Abdullah joked, “You've heard this a million times, but it's really true.” Paider added an analogy, saying that legal works similar to medicine in this way: “If you're in a hospital, the easiest way to make a change is to get a leading doctor on board. … Same thing in a legal department.”
So, are you ready to implement AI? Perhaps not. Ultimately, though, AI may be necessary rather than an option, especially as companies like Walmart are seeing 60 to 80 percent time savings on routine tasks, according to Bryan.
And the change may not be hard if you draw an analogy to something already known—human attorneys. Paider said Nationwide views some of its more robust AI systems as “digital workers,” requiring the same thought and care as human attorneys.
“You have to manage those just like your human workers,” Paider said. “If they were to not 'show up to the office' one day, it would be a big issue.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2025 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
Who Got The Work
J. Brugh Lower of Gibbons has entered an appearance for industrial equipment supplier Devco Corporation in a pending trademark infringement lawsuit. The suit, accusing the defendant of selling knock-off Graco products, was filed Dec. 18 in New Jersey District Court by Rivkin Radler on behalf of Graco Inc. and Graco Minnesota. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Zahid N. Quraishi, is 3:24-cv-11294, Graco Inc. et al v. Devco Corporation.
Who Got The Work
Rebecca Maller-Stein and Kent A. Yalowitz of Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer have entered their appearances for Hanaco Venture Capital and its executives, Lior Prosor and David Frankel, in a pending securities lawsuit. The action, filed on Dec. 24 in New York Southern District Court by Zell, Aron & Co. on behalf of Goldeneye Advisors, accuses the defendants of negligently and fraudulently managing the plaintiff's $1 million investment. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Vernon S. Broderick, is 1:24-cv-09918, Goldeneye Advisors, LLC v. Hanaco Venture Capital, Ltd. et al.
Who Got The Work
Attorneys from A&O Shearman has stepped in as defense counsel for Toronto-Dominion Bank and other defendants in a pending securities class action. The suit, filed Dec. 11 in New York Southern District Court by Bleichmar Fonti & Auld, accuses the defendants of concealing the bank's 'pervasive' deficiencies in regards to its compliance with the Bank Secrecy Act and the quality of its anti-money laundering controls. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, is 1:24-cv-09445, Gonzalez v. The Toronto-Dominion Bank et al.
Who Got The Work
Crown Castle International, a Pennsylvania company providing shared communications infrastructure, has turned to Luke D. Wolf of Gordon Rees Scully Mansukhani to fend off a pending breach-of-contract lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 25 in Michigan Eastern District Court by Hooper Hathaway PC on behalf of The Town Residences LLC, accuses Crown Castle of failing to transfer approximately $30,000 in utility payments from T-Mobile in breach of a roof-top lease and assignment agreement. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Susan K. Declercq, is 2:24-cv-13131, The Town Residences LLC v. T-Mobile US, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Wilfred P. Coronato and Daniel M. Schwartz of McCarter & English have stepped in as defense counsel to Electrolux Home Products Inc. in a pending product liability lawsuit. The court action, filed Nov. 26 in New York Eastern District Court by Poulos Lopiccolo PC and Nagel Rice LLP on behalf of David Stern, alleges that the defendant's refrigerators’ drawers and shelving repeatedly break and fall apart within months after purchase. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Joan M. Azrack, is 2:24-cv-08204, Stern v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250