Reed Smith Enters the Legal Technology Market With GravityStack Subsidiary
The firm's new U.S. subsidiary will incubate and license legal technology, as well as offer tech counseling and managed services to law firm and legal department clients.
April 24, 2018 at 01:11 PM
5 minute read
Photo Credit: Diego M. Radzinschi/ALM
Joining a growing number of law firms entering the tech business, Reed Smith announced the launch of GravityStack, a spin-off subsidiary technology group that will create and license the firms' technology products and provide managed services to law firm and legal department clients.
Bryon Bratcher, head of practice support at Reed Smith and now the managing director of GravityStack, described the new U.S.-based subsidiary as a “data-driven technology group trying to tackle some of the challenges that come up both in litigation transactions and compliance areas of law.”
The new subsidiary, which is wholly owned by Reed Smith, will act as an internal development incubator for new legal technology that it will design, test and license out to legal clients. GravityStack, though, will operate in a few others areas as well. “One is legal technology and systems counseling,” Bratcher said, noting that the group will help clients analyze their data and recommended, implement and optimize legal technology systems.
GravityStack will also offer deployments of teams of data scientists and developers to help clients manage their structured and unstructured data, to enable them to “gain insights that they may not have already known about in their business, or giving them a more defensible positioning,” Bratcher added.
What's more, the group will have a managed legal services operation that will focus on a wide range of services, including “litigation e-discovery, managed transactional contract support, virtual deal rooms, and due diligence risk analysis,” Bratcher said.
As a part of the GravityStack's launch, Reed Smith also announced it will be licensing its e-discovery analytics and business intelligence tool Periscope through the new subsidiary. Periscope, which was created by the firm in 2014, has been internally used at Reed Smith to help clients manage e-discovery spend and efficiency.
Bratcher described Periscope as “basically a data warehouse” that sits on top of the Relativity e-discovery platform to track “the speed and accuracy of document reviewers at the individual level.” In addition, Periscope can also connect with a firm's financial system to track e-discovery project spend, and connect with data processing software to measure and track the size of cases.
By aggregating and analyzing all the data the platform collects, “we can now identify any reviewer that has ever touched our systems over the past few years, the various bureaus, the various firms, the various outside providers, and we can match the best ones to the specific type of cases,” Bratcher said.
The impetus to launch GravityStack came in large part because Reed Smith's clients expressed a desire for a “one-stop-shop” legal services company. Clients told the firm that while there are legal technology companies, legal consulting groups and law firms they rely on, “there is nothing that really harnesses all three of those together,” Bratcher said.
“So GravityStack is really formed as tying to be a polarizing force that brings all those things together—the technology, the business process, and also the legal expertise from Reed Smith as a partner—to deliver a collective intelligence of law,” he added.
To be sure, Reed Smith is far from the only law firm entering the legal technology business. Global law firms Dentons' Nextlaw subsidiaries, for instance, allows it to invest in new legal technology startups and solutions. There are also firms like U.K.-based firms TLT and Slaughter and May that have invested directly in legal technology companies, and in TLT's case, acted at their licensor as well.
Meanwhile, firms like Robins Kaplan and Perkins Coie, have developed internal legal tech solutions around certain practices area like intellectual property and patents that they offer exclusively to their clients.
Reed Smith has been active in promoting and developing legal technology before it created GravityStack. The law firm has recently launched a tech program for summer associates, a data breach notification assessment app, and took a stake in artificial intelligence contract review platform Heretik, which it has a hand in developing.
The launch of GravityStack was a recognition by the firm that “the legal market is certainly changing and has been changing and there is much more demand for operational efficiency,” Bratcher said. “Reed Smith knows that legal expertise is king for our clients, they need that, but now there's sort of this whole redefinition of value, the need [to] be operational efficient in the delivery of [legal services].”
He added that the shift in the market poses an existential pitfall for legal companies not willing or able to adapt. “If law firms aren't at least thinking in this way, to be at operationally efficient, they could be in trouble down the road, because our clients are certainly demanding that.”
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Trump's SEC Likely to Halt 'Off-Channel' Texting Probe That's Led to Billions in Fines
- 2Special Section: Products Liability, Mass Torts & Class Action/Personal Injury
- 3The Elliott Management vs. Southwest Airlines Faceoff: Who Won and What Determined the Outcome?
- 4November Court of Appeals Roundup
- 5Trellis Launches Trellis AI, a New Suite of Automated Litigation Tools
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250