Trying to Tame Outside Counsel Spend? Look Inside the Data
The new Exigent product thinks that predictive technology can give in-house teams the tools they need to control outside counsel spend.
April 25, 2018 at 02:42 PM
3 minute read
The move toward a more business-like, analytics-driven in-house department has been well underway for years now, but seems to be picking up new traction. As predictive analysis models have gotten more powerful, businesses increasingly expect corporate counsel to use these technologies to keep track of their costs.
With its newly released tool, legal software company Exigent Group wants to bring predictive analytics into budgeting and outside counsel spend management for corporate counsel. The tool, Exigent Inform, uses a combination of automation and predictive analytics to help corporate counsel identify potential savings within existing budgets and track outside counsel performance.
Exigent CEO David Holme explained that the the tool was originally designed and customized to fit the needs of one of the company's clients, a large multinational organization. The success of the tool in implementation led the company to develop Exigent Inform for a broader market.
“It's been really built for how people really want to use it, rather than how we think people should use it,” Holme told Legaltech News.
Exigent's software has previously focused on the contract management life cycle in both law firms and in-house departments. The company previously partnered with Morgan, Lewis & Bockius to provide its contract management platform Chameleon to the firm's clients.
This tool specifically is aimed at helping in-house counsel track the return on investment from their outside counsel partners. “Smart GCs see law firms for what they are: strategic suppliers, nothing more and nothing less. Faced with a vast array of choice and little differentiation, GCs should apply the same procurement rigor applied to any other important supplier,” Holme said in a statement.
Holme thinks the focus on spend can also help the product differentiate from other Big Data players in legal. “This is far more about performance and financial performance,” Holme said.
Exigent Inform is offered on a subscription as a service (SaaS) basis, another thing Holme hopes will help the tool stand apart from the pack. “A lot of these tools are not well maintained. The technology is developed, but they're not updated,” he said.
Given increasing demands on in-house teams to get a hold on outside counsel spend, AI and machine learning-based technology is now rushing to fill the void. General counsels at Yahoo and Uber spoke to CLOC members last year about the legal spend analytics tools they use to assess outside counsel relationships and reduce spend.
Despite the great potential of these tools, the promised gains of Big Data tools are just now taking meaningful form. Predictive modeling requires a great deal of data to train algorithms, meaning that the actionable insight they advertise may be a little ways down the line.
Holme hopes that Exigent Inform can nonetheless be on the forefront of this technology. The company already has plenty of data to train its models, but Holme sees plenty of room to grow and refine as organizations create and track more data. “As your data grows, the value grows,” he said.
This content has been archived. It is available through our partners, LexisNexis® and Bloomberg Law.
To view this content, please continue to their sites.
Not a Lexis Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
Not a Bloomberg Law Subscriber?
Subscribe Now
NOT FOR REPRINT
© 2024 ALM Global, LLC, All Rights Reserved. Request academic re-use from www.copyright.com. All other uses, submit a request to [email protected]. For more information visit Asset & Logo Licensing.
You Might Like
View AllTrending Stories
- 1Elon Musk Names Microsoft, Calif. AG to Amended OpenAI Suit
- 2Trump’s Plan to Purge Democracy
- 3Baltimore City Govt., After Winning Opioid Jury Trial, Preparing to Demand an Additional $11B for Abatement Costs
- 4X Joins Legal Attack on California's New Deepfakes Law
- 5Monsanto Wins Latest Philadelphia Roundup Trial
Who Got The Work
Michael G. Bongiorno, Andrew Scott Dulberg and Elizabeth E. Driscoll from Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr have stepped in to represent Symbotic Inc., an A.I.-enabled technology platform that focuses on increasing supply chain efficiency, and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The case, filed Oct. 2 in Massachusetts District Court by the Brown Law Firm on behalf of Stephen Austen, accuses certain officers and directors of misleading investors in regard to Symbotic's potential for margin growth by failing to disclose that the company was not equipped to timely deploy its systems or manage expenses through project delays. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton, is 1:24-cv-12522, Austen v. Cohen et al.
Who Got The Work
Edmund Polubinski and Marie Killmond of Davis Polk & Wardwell have entered appearances for data platform software development company MongoDB and other defendants in a pending shareholder derivative lawsuit. The action, filed Oct. 7 in New York Southern District Court by the Brown Law Firm, accuses the company's directors and/or officers of falsely expressing confidence in the company’s restructuring of its sales incentive plan and downplaying the severity of decreases in its upfront commitments. The case is 1:24-cv-07594, Roy v. Ittycheria et al.
Who Got The Work
Amy O. Bruchs and Kurt F. Ellison of Michael Best & Friedrich have entered appearances for Epic Systems Corp. in a pending employment discrimination lawsuit. The suit was filed Sept. 7 in Wisconsin Western District Court by Levine Eisberner LLC and Siri & Glimstad on behalf of a project manager who claims that he was wrongfully terminated after applying for a religious exemption to the defendant's COVID-19 vaccine mandate. The case, assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Anita Marie Boor, is 3:24-cv-00630, Secker, Nathan v. Epic Systems Corporation.
Who Got The Work
David X. Sullivan, Thomas J. Finn and Gregory A. Hall from McCarter & English have entered appearances for Sunrun Installation Services in a pending civil rights lawsuit. The complaint was filed Sept. 4 in Connecticut District Court by attorney Robert M. Berke on behalf of former employee George Edward Steins, who was arrested and charged with employing an unregistered home improvement salesperson. The complaint alleges that had Sunrun informed the Connecticut Department of Consumer Protection that the plaintiff's employment had ended in 2017 and that he no longer held Sunrun's home improvement contractor license, he would not have been hit with charges, which were dismissed in May 2024. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer, is 3:24-cv-01423, Steins v. Sunrun, Inc. et al.
Who Got The Work
Greenberg Traurig shareholder Joshua L. Raskin has entered an appearance for boohoo.com UK Ltd. in a pending patent infringement lawsuit. The suit, filed Sept. 3 in Texas Eastern District Court by Rozier Hardt McDonough on behalf of Alto Dynamics, asserts five patents related to an online shopping platform. The case, assigned to U.S. District Judge Rodney Gilstrap, is 2:24-cv-00719, Alto Dynamics, LLC v. boohoo.com UK Limited.
Featured Firms
Law Offices of Gary Martin Hays & Associates, P.C.
(470) 294-1674
Law Offices of Mark E. Salomone
(857) 444-6468
Smith & Hassler
(713) 739-1250